Authentication
290x Tipe PPTX Ukuran file 0.07 MB Source: www.ut.ac.id
THE PROJECT
1) overview of standards, guidelines and benchmarks for quality
open, distance, flexible, and online education, including e-learning
2) analysis of and recommendation for which standards and
guidelines that are most relevant for the ICDE membership,
3) analysis of opportunities for ICDE to align its work with that of key
national and international stakeholders, included quality agencies.
4) recommendations for ICDE’s future work on quality guidelines,
benchmarks, standards and quality.
5) presentation of a series of proposals, which ICDE may realistically
pursue including an analysis of resources required
WHAT HAS BEEN DONE
● An overview of existing international quality standards
models, including online post HE, OER and MOOCs
● Analysis and clustering of selected most in use quality
standards models
● Stakeholder analysis
● First set of recommendations
● First set of proposals
International research advisory group led by Prof M Brown
FINDINGS SO FAR
Lots of different guidelines /models, this is problematic on
one side on the other hand quality is contextualized
Different approaches; frame of reference/
benchmarking/certification
by whom/purpose
Multiplyed global/local/national
eL quality should be mainstreamed and integrated in
ordinary QATools and to scaffolding
Generic vs cultural
SET OF PRINCIPLES ON QUALITY
Dynamic
Process conversation incl reflective practice
Stakeholders interested incl students
Approaches: Enhancement vs assurance
Contextbound contextualises generic /vs content
Contestable/ debatable
Maturity
Open culture/practice core of culture
Personalisation
First set of recommendations
QA systems must
● be flexible enough to deal with rapid change in the field: several have lost
their relevance due to inability to change fast enough
● be better contextualised to the needs (culture, language, socio-economic
priorities) of local regions (but not at the expense of internationalisation)·
ICDE should:
● create a link between the conclusions of this study and the review teams
● provide more examples of local models through its’ members
● Communicate the principles
● Curate a Quality Hub cf OER HUB, which is continually kept updated
● Continue its research and mapping activities
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.