271x Filetype PPT File size 2.01 MB Source: hr.wharton.upenn.edu
Wharton Committee
Dan Alig
Shanna Hocking
Colleen O’Neill
Jonathan Katzenbach
Peter Winicov
Kim Ridley
Amy Collins
Tammy Rawls
Emma Grigore
Jill Gran
Anna Loh
2
Wharton Human Resources
Participants in the pilot program
Wharton
ULAR
Business Services
Exec Dir BSD Finance
SAS
Linguistic Data Consortium (LDC)
SAS Facilities
SAS computing
SAS Human Resources
ELP
LPS
Department of Africana Studies
Center for Africana Studies
Chemistry
SAS Finance and Administration
Professional and Liberal Education
3
Wharton Human Resources
Objectives
Introduce an easier way to facilitate
feedback
Encourage more frequent and timely
conversations
Create a collaborative process
Focus on the feedback and not the
process
4
Wharton Human Resources
Wharton Human Resources
Differences
Annual Review Feedback Sessions
Outdated Updated
Occurs at the end of the fiscal Occurs at the end of the quarter
year
Focus on the past and tasks Focus on the future
Supervisor driven Equal partners
Focuses on process Focuses on feedback
Establishes development opportunities Develops development opportunities
once a year four times a year
Time consuming Easier
Supervisor “rates” the employee No ratings
5
Wharton Human Resources
Process
End of each quarter employee and supervisor will receive an email
directing them to answer questions in an automated system.*
Employee or supervisor will schedule a feedback meeting.
Discuss answers.
In Q4, supervisor will set goals for upcoming fiscal year.
HR will be able to see who is participating.
*until the process is automated, we will use a paper form sent
via email.
6
Wharton Human Resources
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.