297x Filetype PDF File size 1.11 MB Source: core.ac.uk
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk
Provided by Lincoln University Research Archive
Voluntary Environmental Reporting:
The Why, What and How
A thesis
submitted in partial fulfilment
of the requirements for the Degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
at
Lincoln University
by
T-A. De Silva
Lincoln University
2008
This thesis is dedicated
to everyone who
encouraged me to complete.
ii
Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the Degree of Ph.D.
Voluntary Environmental Reporting:
The Why, What and How
by
T-A. De Silva
Society is increasingly calling for organisations to demonstrate corporate social
responsibility (CSR). To fulfil this demand, organisations need to be accountable,
democratic and transparent to their stakeholders. This can be achieved using a number of
tools including communication about the environmental, social and economic impacts of
an organisation’s actions and activities. Yet despite the importance of communicating
environmental information, and society’s heightened environmental awareness,
organisations are still demonstrating an insufficient commitment to environmental
reporting, continuing their reluctance to be open and accountable about their
environmental impacts. This suggests organisations currently have little understanding of
why they should report, what they should report and/or how they should report.
For environmental reporting progress to be achieved it is important that we have
knowledge of how various factors influence voluntary environmental reporting
engagement. This research, in contributing to and extending the body of environmental
reporting knowledge, aims to provide an understanding of the Why, What and How of
voluntary environmental reporting by specifically examining: why organisations should,
and why organisations do, voluntarily report environmental information; what
environmental information organisations should, and what environmental information
organisations do, voluntarily report; and how organisations should, and how organisations
do, voluntarily report environmental information.
In using a combination of research methodologies this research extends prior CSR
reporting studies – closing the gap between voluntary environmental reporting practice and
theory, providing better insights into the underlying reasons and motivations for voluntary
iii
environmental reporting, and providing improved knowledge of the considerations made
by companies as part of the voluntary environmental reporting process. In doing so, this
research presents a more recent examination of voluntary environmental reporting in the
annual reports of New Zealand and Australian publicly listed companies. Aspects of
voluntary environmental reporting that have not been extensively examined before,
particularly in Australasia, are examined. These include a focus on content-quality (as
opposed to reporting quantity), an investigation of the effect of public pressure (using a
combination of three proxy measures), and, through the use of qualitative research, an
expansion of the insights obtained from quantitative data.
This research finds that New Zealand and Australian publicly listed companies continue to
have an insufficient and incorrect understanding of why they should report, what they
should report and/or how they should voluntarily report environmental information. This
deficient understanding results in voluntary environmental reporting in their annual reports
which is inadequate – the reporting lacks meaning and purpose (i.e. has form but little or
no substance), and reflects managers’ incorrect perceptions about the environmental
impact of their company’s actions and activities. As a result voluntary environmental
reporting in the annual reports of New Zealand and Australian publicly listed companies
fails to “… give an understanding, which is not misleading, …” of the environmental
consequences of an organisation’s actions and activities (adapted from Alexander &
Jermakowicz, 2006, p. 132), providing little accountability to stakeholders, and serving
neither external stakeholders nor those reporting well. As the demand for organisations to
demonstrate accountability to stakeholders continues to increase over time it is important
to develop informed environmental reporting guidance and undertake further examinations
of the Why, What and How of environmental reporting.
Keywords:
Environmental Reporting, Public Pressure, Content-Quality, Reporting Quality, Social
Contract, Legitimacy Theory, Reputation, Social licence to Operate, Corporations Act
2001 (Cth) s299(1)(f)
iv
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.