298x Filetype PDF File size 0.21 MB Source: www.store.ectap.ro
Theoretical and Applied Economics
Volume XVIII (2011), No. 10(563), pp. 127-144
Technological Innovation:
Concept, Process, Typology
and Implications in the Economy
Mihaela DIACONU
“Petre Andrei” University of Iaşi
mhl_dcn@yahoo.fr
Abstract. Growing interest worldwide to boost innovation in
business sector activities, especially the technology, is intended to
maintain or increase national economic competitiveness, inclusively as
an effect of awareness concerning the effects resulting from economic
activity on consumption of resources and environment, which requires
design of new patterns of production and consumption. In this paper we
review the most important contributions in the literature in terms of the
implications of technological innovation in the economy, at the micro-
and macroeconomic level, viewing the organization's ability to generate
new ideas in support of increasing production, employment and
environmental protection, starting from the concepts of innovation,
innovation process and, respectively, from the innovation typology
analysis.
Keywords: technological innovation; innovation process; eco-
innovation; research and development; economic development.
JEL Code: O33.
REL Code: 18D.
128 Mihaela Diaconu
1. Introduction
Which are the implications of innovation in economic and social life? The
answer to this question, as one can argue, is based on the meaning of the term
innovation. A widespread perception on innovation is one that refers to advanced
technology solutions offered by using the latest knowledge. Such innovations are
mainly considered to be the result of highly skilled workforce and businesses
activity with significant research and development intensity, having close
linkages to the most important centers of excellence in the scientific world. The
significance of innovation is, however, broader and includes innovations that are
not achieved within high-tech industry mentioned above. From this last
perspective, innovations do not include only new products or processes, but also
cover the improved ones resulted from the so-called low-tech sectors, which may
have cumulative economic and social effects as important.
Growing interest worldwide to boost innovative activity of enterprises,
especially technological innovation, is intended to maintain or enhance the
competitiveness of national economies, but also is a result of awareness of the
effects on consumption of resources and environment impact resulted from
economic activity, which requires design of new patterns of production and
consumption. In this paper, we discuss the ways in which technological
innovation contributes to economic development. In the context of this analysis,
we look to sustainable development of organizations as a result of their ability
to generate new ideas in support of increasing production, employment and
environmental protection. Therefore, section 2 is allocated to the concept of
technological innovation and innovation process, taking into account attributes
recently incorporated into the symbolic reflecting the impact of different types
of innovations obtainable on the economic and social life. Since the implica-
tions of different types of technological innovation in the economy still
comprise a controversial topic in the literature, especially in the empirical one,
we consider first to analyze the types of innovations in section 3, from
different points of view. In section 4 we outline the theoretical and empirical
existing framework regarding the incidence of technological innovation in the
economy by reviewing the most important contributions to literature and
section 5 concludes.
2. Technological innovation concept and innovation process
The Schumpeterian point of view approaches economic development as a
qualitative changes process, as consequences of innovation. Thus, J. Schumpeter
addresses innovation as a function of entrepreneurial activity, in which “new
Technological Innovation: Concept, Process, Typology and Implications in the Economy 129
combinations” of existing resources occur. The definition offered by
Schumpeter in the Theory of Economic Development (1934) is continuing to be
referential in associating “new combinations” of production factors of new
products and services, introducing new production processes, marketing and
business organization.
In principle, the literature operates with distinguishing invention from
innovation. For example, F. Malerba (1997) defines invention as a new idea, a
new scientific discovery or a technological newness (which has not been
implemented and diffused), while innovation refers to a tradable application of
an invention, as a result of invention integration into economic and social
practice. Innovation is regarded, therefore, being a result of a process that starts
with an idea genesis and continues with its materialization. In the same
Schumpeterian context, Oslo Manual (2005) defines innovation to be an
activity that produces new or significantly improved goods (products or
services), processes, marketing methods or business organization. In this
framework, according to Frascati Manual (OECD, 2002), technological
innovations comprise new or significantly modified technological products and
processes, where technological novelty emerges, unlike improvements, from
their performance characteristics.
Consequent to afferent processes interrelations, dissociating invention
from innovation is not always possible, especially for technological innovation.
Nevertheless, the fact that there may be differences even of some decades
between the occurrence of innovation and of invention, which reflects different
demands of coming over upon an idea and its implementation into practice is
known, including due to fact that certain conditions are not fulfilled for
diffusing (still insufficient demand, production impossible consequent to lack of
input or production complementary factors that are not available yet). In
addition, an invention implementation might need, in its turn, supplementary
inventions and innovations for the innovation process success.
As K. Pavin (1987, p. 9) notes, “most technologies are complex and are
cumulative. They are specific for companies at whose level technologic activity
predominantly occurs”. While inventions may result from different economic
and social environments, innovations are mainly a result of the firm’s activity.
To be capable to utilize an invention and turn it into innovation, the firm should
efficiently combine information, human, financial and material resources and
existence of a functional distribution system is needed. From such perspective,
the inventor’s role differs from that of innovator’s (person or organization unit
responsible for required factors combination, in Schumpeterian vision named
“entrepreneur”).
130 Mihaela Diaconu
Difficulty to differentiate between invention and innovation also comes
from the innovation process continuity, as S.L. Kline and N. Rosenberg (1986,
p. 283) were to note: “it is a serious mistake to treat an innovation as if it were a
well-defined, homogenous thing that could be identified as entering the
economy at a precise date – or becoming available at a precise point of time.
The fact is that most important innovations go through drastic changes in their
lifetimes – changes that may and often do, totally transform their economic
significance. The subsequent improvements in an invention after its first
introduction may be vastly more important, economically, than the initial
availability of the invention in its original form”. Hence, invention can be often
an outcome of a long process in which numerous interrelated innovation
processes are involved.
Innovation processes do not show the same characteristics regarding
financial resources engaged and obtainable outcomes, but present
differentiations at the enterprise level according to the innovation type, firm’s
size or its strategy and experience in innovation area. Diversity of innovative
processes generates difficulties in analyzing costs and results of innovation
activities by using micro-aggregated data. Therefore, the study of innovative
activity of companies is focused on the innovation facilitators and their effects
in terms of business competitive advantages obtainable by sector or economy as
a whole. Nevertheless, we depict some common features of innovation
processes:
they imply exploring opportunities for achieving new/improved goods
(products and services) based upon technical knowledge as well as the
market demand change or a combination of the two. Investment efforts
of technological innovation predominantly correspond to
“development and production engineering, in which knowledge is
accumulated by experience in production, learning by using and
learning by doing (Pavitt, 1987, p. 9);
it is impossible an accurate prevision of costs and performances
involved in the innovation process mainly based on research and
development and the users’ reaction to the new artifacts.
Difficulties in analyzing of innovation business activity are due, in our
opinion, to the fact that innovation is not a linear process consisting of
sequential, time and conceptual-distinctive stages that define unidirectional
causalities. Innovation is based on the use of previously acquired knowledge, on
the results of new technologies, on the technological development or on the new
combinations of existing technology. However, the “linear model” (Figure 1) –
while it does not depict all possible connections between the stages of
innovation process and, respectively, by reconsidering the earliest ones by the
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.