jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Sample Of Research Proposal Pdf 52644 | Ra Omj D 16 00073 (06j)


 188x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.48 MB       Source: omjournal.org


Sample Of Research Proposal Pdf 52644 | Ra Omj D 16 00073 (06j)
 no  3 180 188 writing a research proposal to the research council of oman 1 2 ahmed al shukaili   and abdullah al maniri 1 director of health  ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 20 Aug 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              ahmed al-Shukaili, et al.                                                                 181
                         review article                                                           Oman medical Journal [2017], vol. 32, no. 3:180-188   
                       Writing a Research Proposal to The Research 
                       Council of Oman
                                                  1                                    2
                       Ahmed Al-Shukaili * and Abdullah Al-Maniri
                       1
                        Director of Health and Social Services Sector, The Research Council of Oman, Muscat, Oman
                       2
                        Research Department, Oman Medical Specialty Board, Muscat, Oman
                       ARTICLE INFO                     ABSTRACT
                       Article history:                 Writing a research proposal can be a challenging task for young researchers. This article 
                       Received: 24 April 2016          explains how to write a strong research proposal to apply for funding, specifically, a 
                       Accepted: 23 October 2016        proposal for The Research Council (TRC) of Oman. Three different research proposal 
                       Online:                          application forms are currently used in TRC, including Open Research Grant (ORG), 
                       DOI 10.5001/omj.2017.35          Graduate Research Support Program (GRSP), and Faculty-mentored Undergraduate 
                       Keywords:                        Research award Program (FURaP). The application forms are filled and submitted 
                       Writing; Research; Research      electronically on TRC website. each of the proposals submitted to TRC is selected 
                       Design; Research Support.        through a rigorous reviewing and screening process. novelty and originality of the 
                                                        research idea is the most crucial element in writing a research proposal. Performing an 
                                                        in-depth review of the literature will assist you to compose a good researchable question 
                                                        and generate a strong hypothesis. The development of a good hypothesis will offer insight 
                                                        into the specific objectives of a study. Research objectives should be focused, measurable, 
                                                        and achievable by a specific time using the most appropriate methodology. moreover, it 
                                                        is essential to select a proper study design in-line with the purpose of the study and the 
                                                        hypothesis. Furthermore, social/economic impact and reasonable budget of proposed 
                                                        research are important criteria in research proposal evaluation by TRC. Finally, ethical 
                                                        principles should be observed before writing a research proposal involving human or 
                                                        animal subjects.
                                             riting a research proposal can be             ■  Faculty-mentored Undergraduate Research 
                                             a challenging task, especially for               award Program (FURaP), a small grant for 
                                                                                                                           4
                                             inexperienced researchers. This                  undergraduate students.
                       Warticle explains how to write a                                        The differences in the contents and length of 
                       research proposal to apply for funding, specifically, a             these applications are attributed to the nature and 
                       proposal for The Research Council (TRC) of Oman.                    requirements needed for each grant. The application 
                           a research proposal is a concise and coherent                   forms are completed and submitted electronically 
                       description of a planned research project.1 It should               on TRC website. The contents of these applications 
                       contain all of the information the evaluators will                  forms are summarized in Table 1. after submission, 
                       need, such as the background information about                      the proposal passes through several stages [Figure 1].
                       the topic, the project’s significance and objectives, 
                       and the methods you will employ to achieve the                      Before you start
                       objectives and budgetary details.                                   Good research starts with a good idea. To identify a 
                           The components of research proposals are similar                good research idea, you should ask yourself several 
                       worldwide, with small differences that depends on                   questions:
                       the funder’s requirements. In TRC, three research                   1. What do you find intriguing in your field?
                       proposal application forms are used for three                       2. What do you want to add to your field?
                       different research grants awarded to individual                     3. Is this project a novel contribution? does it differ 
                       researchers:                                                           from existing research?
                       ■  Open Research Grant (ORG), awarded to 
                                                                                     2
                          researchers holding a Ph.d. degree (or equivalent).              4. If your answer to question 3 is “no,” but you believe 
                       ■  Graduate Research Support Program (GRSP)                            that your approach to the problem is different 
                          a small grant intended to support predoctoral                       from existing methods, why do you believe that 
                                        3                                                                                                        5
                          researchers.                                                        your approach will have a better outcome?
                       *Corresponding author: ashukaily@hotmail.com                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               Oman med J, vOl 32, nO 3, may 2017
                                                                                                                  ahmed al-Shukaili, et al.                                                                                                            181
                                        Table 1: Content of different research proposal applications forms at The Research Council.
                                          Grant name                                        Research Proposal contents                                          Principal investigator                   Maximum fund in 
                                                                                                                                                                       qualifications                         Omani Rials
                                          Open Research                  ■ Title                                                                                      Ph.d. holder or                             no cap
                                          Grant (ORG)                    ■ Executive summary                                                                              equivalent
                                                                         ■ Introduction and statement of the problem or project
                                                                         ■ Literature review and analysis of related work  
                                                                           (with references)
                                                                         ■ Description of the benefits to Oman
                                                                         ■ Outline of proposed activities and research methodology
                                                                         ■ Academic, scientific, and/or innovative significance
                                                                         ■ Expected economic impacts
                                                                         ■ Expected social, cultural, educational, and welfare 
                                                                           benefits
                                                                         ■ Cost analysis
                                                                         ■ Duration of the project
                                          Graduate                       ■ Executive summary                                                                    master/Bachelor degree                              5 000
                                          Research Support               ■ Background                                                                                       holders
                                          Program (GRSP)                 ■ Specific aims                                                                         Postgraduate students
                                                                         ■ Significance and career goals
                                                                         ■ Research design and methods
                                                                         ■ Execution plan
                                                                         ■ References
                                                                         ■ Budget
                                          Faculty-mentored               ■ Project description (summary)                                                        Undergraduate students                              2 400
                                          Undergraduate                  ■ Project significant
                                          Research                       ■ Methodology
                                          award Program                  ■ Timeline
                                          (FURaP)
                                                                         ■ Budget
                                                  Principal investigator (PI) fills and submits proposal via TRC                                   after you answer the questions, you can begin 
                                            1     submission system                                                                         formulating a research question. However, not 
                                            2     Research team notifications/approval                                                       having all of the answers to those questions indicates 
                                                  Institutional focal point (IFP)approval                                                   that you are not ready and that you will need to 
                                                                                                                                   P
                                            3                                                                                      re
                                                                                                                                   -
                                                                                                                                   a        perform an in-depth review of the literature on 
                                                                                                                                   w
                                                  Reviewers / grant committee evaluate the proposal                                a
                                            4                                                                                      rd       your topic to compose researchable questions. 
                                            5     Budget committee approves/rejects the funding                                             Composing an important question that you can 
                                                  IFP/PI notification                                                                        answer is a challenging task, because it is difficult 
                                            6                                                                                               to find a research question that can be transformed 
                                                  Signing agreement with TRC (if the proposal has been approved                             into a feasible and valid study plan.6 Formulating a 
                                            7     for funding).
                                                  Project commencement                                                                      research question is discussed in more detail on a 
                                            8                                                                                                                            6,7
                                                                                                                                            separate section.
                                            9     Annual progress report submission by PI through IFP                              P
                                                  Annual progress report approval by TRC                                           ost-a    Title of the proposal
                                           10                                                                                      w
                                                                                                                                   ar
                                           11     Final report submission by PI through IFP                                        d        The title of the research proposal is important 
                                                                                                                                            to evaluators. It piques the reader’s interest and, 
                                           12     Final report approval by TRC                                                              therefore, should be selected carefully. The title should 
                                                  Closedown of the project                                                                  not be too long but should be concise, descriptive, 
                                           13                                                                                               and informative. Try to avoid unnecessary words, 
                                        Figure 1: General overview of the pre- and post-                                                    such as “investigation into…”, “study of…”, and do 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          7–9
                                        award process of a research proposal submitted to                                                   not overstate expected outcomes in the title.                                       Some 
                                        The Research Council (TRC).                                                                         examples of good and bad titles are listed in Box 1.
*Corresponding author: ashukaily@hotmail.com                                                                                                                                                   Oman med J, vOl 32, nO 3, may 2017
         182                                                                    ahmed al-Shukaili, et al.                                                                                                                                                                             ahmed al-Shukaili, et al.                                                                          183
                         Box 1: Examples of good and bad research titles.                          Box 2: Examples of research questions.
                                          “Anxiety, depression and diabetes”                              “Does smoking contribute to heart diseases in diabetic 
                                             (too brief, not informative).                                                       patients?”
                           “Study of the role of anxiety and depression in onset of diabetes          (This research question has a weak scientific value because 
                           in interior regions of Sultanate of Oman: A Prospective study”             smoking is well known to be a risk factor for heart diseases 
                                    (not concise, contains unnecessary words).                        in normal individuals, so it does not add anything novel to 
                             “A prospective study of the role of anxiety and depression in                                      the topic).
                                               onset of diabetes type II”                            “Do the diabetic patients with major depression are more likely 
                                      (informative, concise and not too long).                                 to have higher cardiovascular risk factors?”
                                                                                                      (This question is relevant, it has a value to the health care, 
                                                                                                                           feasible, and clear).
                         Formulating research questions                                            ■  Feasible: The feasibility of a research question is 
                         Research questions differ from hypotheses and                                crucial when applying for a grant from a funder. 
                         objectives. The research question is the question                            The question must be within your ability to handle 
                         that the project sets out to answer; it guides and                           in terms of resources needed and project duration. 
                         centers your proposed research, whereas a hypothesis                         It is good practice to put a contingency plan in 
                                                                                                                                                        6,10
                         postulates a relationship between two or more                                place to anticipate possible problems.                 
                         variables. In other words, it translates the research                          Some examples of research questions are 
                         question into a theory of expected outcomes.                              illustrated in Box 2.
                         Objectives are detailed descriptions of the project’s 
                                                                          10,11
                         purpose and expected achievements.                                        Hypothesis
                              To develop a strong research question, you should                    The hypothesis is a fundamental component of 
                         ask yourself the questions listed above. Choose a                         quantitative research; it predicts a relationship 
                         topic of interest and conduct preliminary research.                       between two or more variables. like the research 
                         Focus on recent publications to find out what                             question, a strong hypothesis should have several 
                         research has already been performed on this topic.                        important features. It should be novel and original, 
                              Good research questions have several features,                       measurable by the proposed methodology, fit the 
                         including the following:                                                  research interests of the principal investigators, have 
                         ■  Novel and original: do not copy a research                             reasonable predictions of the relationship between 
                            question that already has an answer.                                   the variables, and relevant to the context of the 
                                                                                                                            6,11 
                         ■  Significant merit: Research questions must                             research [Box 3].            you can include more than 
                            have scientific value and should add significant                       one hypothesis in your research proposal, but pay 
                                                                                                                                                              8
                            information to the literature on that particular                       attention to the adequacy of the sample size.  
                            topic.                                                                      The development of a good hypothesis will 
                         ■  Relevant to the context: in which the research is                      offer insight into the specific objectives of a study. 
                            conducted. Strong research questions should offer                      Remember that if the research proposal is based on 
                            a solution to a problem in the community.                              a weak hypothesis or unfeasible, it may be rejected.
                         ■  Ethical: Before you start writing a research 
                            proposal, ask yourself: What are the potential                         Executive summary
                            harms and benefits to the participants? Harm                           The executive summary is a brief overview of the 
                            could be physical (such as that caused by medical                      research proposal. It should provide the reader 
                            interventions) or mental (such as breaches                             with the main points and the conclusion of your 
                            of confidentiality). all of these issues will be 
                            assessed by an ethics committee (see “ethical                          Box 3: Research hypothesis examples.
                            Considerations” section).
                         ■  Clear and reasonably short: Posing questions                               “Elevated level of inflammatory mediators is associated with 
                            that are unclear or too long gives the reader the                                     major depression in diabetic patients”
                            impression that you lack knowledge of the topic.                            (This is a good hypothesis, based on several evidences. 
                                                                                                              elevated circulating inflammatory markers: 
                            If you have too long a question, you can break it                               (a) predict the development of type 2 diabetes, 
                                                                                                     and (b) may have a role in the biology of major depression).
                            down into multiple questions to make it simple                                any hypothesis not based on scientific evidences is 
                            and understandable.                                                                      considered a weak hypothesis.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Oman med J, vOl 32, nO 3, may 2017
182ahmed al-Shukaili, et al.                                          ahmed al-Shukaili, et al.                                                          183
                         proposal. The required length varies; it may be              contributions, outline contradictions, and identify 
                         between 200 and 400 words or be as long as one               any lacunas or unresolved questions.
                         a4 page, depending on funder requirements. It is                 Researchers should invest significant effort in the 
                         best to keep the summary short and clear. It should          literature review because it exhibits your knowledge 
                         include an introduction that provides the reader             of the topic and allows you to develop new insights 
                         with background information (such as the problem             into your research. Stated simply, you should convince 
                         and its significance, the research question, and             the proposal’s evaluators that your project will make 
                         the rationale for the study), objectives, the target         a significant original contribution to the subject area.
                         population and study sample, a brief description                 The literature review should be well organized. 
                         of your methodology (your approach to finding a              To accomplish this, imagine that you are writing a 
                         solution), and the study’s expected impact. It should        story. The events of the story should take place in the 
                         not contain references, abbreviations, citations,            correct order; therefore, use subheadings to bring a 
                                           7–9, 12
                         tables or figures.                                           clear sequence and coherence to your narrative. Start 
                                                                                      with the main theme and break it down into smaller 
                         Introduction and statement of the problem/                   parts, avoid the repetition of words or sentences, 
                         project                                                      cite any influential papers, read current papers to 
                         The principal purpose of the introduction and                keep up with recent developments on the research 
                         statement of the problem are to explain the meaning          topic, critically evaluate those papers and formulate 
                         of your research, present the problem, and provide           a framework showing the relationship between them. 
                         a strong argument for why the study is necessary. It         ensure that these papers are of sufficient value to merit 
                         should be presented in a focused manner rather than          citing; avoid irrelevant, trivial references or secondary 
                         in a general context. Try to “enlarge” your research         sources. Finally, include in your review all of the 
                                                                                                                                            6–11
                         question and pose it in a realistic way as a “hot”           factors stated in the section on specific objectives.
                         topic. Frame the problem by giving recent numbers                medical references can be obtained from many 
                         or percentages of individuals affected globally and          search engines, which offer a comprehensive resource 
                         locally, and well as the incidence (rate of occurrence)      to researchers and healthcare providers, such as the 
                         and prevalence. Clearly describe the effects of a            national library of medicine, OmnimedicalSearch, 
                         health problem, for example, on individuals or               Pubmed, and many others.
                         society (e.g., poor quality of life, health care or society 
                         costs). Finally, it is advisable to select a problem that    Aims and objectives
                         national or international organizations consider a           The aim section is a broad statement describing the 
                         research priority.                                           goals of the project or the overall purpose of the 
                             The introduction and statement of the problem            research project, followed by specific objectives.
                         includes the following elements:                                 Specific objectives are statements that define the 
                         ■  a brief introduction to the topic.                        measurable outcomes and detail the main aim or 
                         ■  a discussion of the problem’s significance.               purpose of the project.9,10
                         ■  novelty of the research (at least in a local context).        Both the aims and objectives should be related 
                         ■  Reasons for conducting the study.                         to the study’s hypothesis. It should be measurable, 
                         ■  expected outcomes and benefits of the study.              achievable, realistic, and time-constrained. It is 
                                                                                      crucial that the aims and objectives have these 
                         Literature review                                            features because objectives provide reviewers with a 
                         authors should realize that the literature review            clear picture of what you want to accomplish, form 
                         differs from the introduction to the problem and that        the foundation for the rest of the proposal, and are 
                         they should be separated from each other. essentially,       used to assess the adequacy and appropriateness 
                         a literature review is an extensive survey of the research   of the proposed methods. moreover, a strong aim 
                         that has already been conducted on the chosen topic.         and objective statements should contain active 
                         It is an essential component of a research proposal. It      verbs, such as “examine”, “construct”, “classify”, and 
                                                                                                 7,9–11
                         allows you to discover what has been written about           “develop”.       If you have more than one objective, 
                         the topic, state what each source contributes to the         it is advisable to order them numerically. an example 
                         topic, examine the relationship between various              of an aim and specific objectives is given in Box 4.
                                                                                                                       Oman med J, vOl 32, nO 3, may 2017
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Ahmed al shukaili et review article oman medical journal vol no writing a research proposal to the council of and abdullah maniri director health social services sector muscat department specialty board info abstract history can be challenging task for young researchers this received april explains how write strong apply funding specifically accepted october trc three different online application forms are currently used in including open grant org doi omj graduate support program grsp faculty mentored undergraduate keywords award furap filled submitted electronically on website each proposals is selected design through rigorous reviewing screening process novelty originality idea most crucial element performing an depth literature will assist you compose good researchable question generate hypothesis development offer insight into specific objectives study should focused measurable achievable by time using appropriate methodology moreover it essential select proper line with purpose f...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.