Filetype Excel XLSX | Posted on 15 Aug 2022 | 3 years ago
Authentication
digital resources
176x Filetype XLSX File size 0.20 MB Source: dec.alaska.gov
Sheet 1: key
| Question # | Prompt |
| 1 | ? 3. The ADEC Response Exercise Program helps improve my organization's ability to respond to an oil spill. (4) ? How does the current ADEC Response Exercise program help your organization improve its ability to respond do an oil spill? |
| 2 | ? 3. The ADEC Response Exercise Program helps improve my organization's ability to respond to an oil spill. (4) ? What do we keep? |
| 3 | ? 3. The ADEC Response Exercise Program helps improve my organization's ability to respond to an oil spill. (4) ? What do we change? |
| 4 | ? 3. The ADEC Response Exercise Program helps improve my organization's ability to respond to an oil spill. (4) ? What do we eliminate? |
| 5 | ? 5. ADEC should develop a guidance document to assist operators in understanding the purpose, expectations, and requirements of the ADEC Response Exercise Program. (3) ? What elements should be included in a guidance document to the ADEC Response Exercise Program and why? |
| 6 | ? 5. ADEC should develop a guidance document to assist operators in understanding the purpose, expectations, and requirements of the ADEC Response Exercise Program. (3) ? Is NPREP sufficient for the State of Alaska to determine if a state approved Oil Discharge Prevention and Contingency plan is adequate in content and execution? Why or Why not? |
| 7 | ? 5. ADEC should develop a guidance document to assist operators in understanding the purpose, expectations, and requirements of the ADEC Response Exercise Program. (3) ? Can some state and federal exercise requirements be more efficiently combined? |
| 8 | ? 17. Please rate your familiarity with Homeland Security Exercise Evaluation Program (HSEEP). (1) ? After seeing the HSEEP presentation, which components of HSEEP would be useful for ADEC to adopt? |
| 9 | ? 1. The role of ADEC staff during exercises is clear and is helpful to our exercise experience. (2) ? How can ADEC staff make their role during exercises more clear? |
| 10 | ? 1. The role of ADEC staff during exercises is clear and is helpful to our exercise experience. (2) ? How can ADEC staff be more helpful during exercises? |
| 11 | ? 2. Participation in response exercises represents a good value (in terms of time and money) for my organization. (2) ? What does “value” in a response exercise mean to you? |
| 12 | ? 2. Participation in response exercises represents a good value (in terms of time and money) for my organization. (2) ? What can be done to improve the value of exercises? |
| 13 | ? 9. Many of the drills and exercises that I have attended are too scripted and practiced to be useful for assessing preparedness. (2) ? What can be done to make exercises less scripted? |
| 14 | ? 9. Many of the drills and exercises that I have attended are too scripted and practiced to be useful for assessing preparedness. (2) ? How do we make exercises more realistic? |
| 15 | ? 10. Unannounced exercises are useful for testing response readiness and should be utilized more often. (1) ? If you disagree with this statement, why? |
| 16 | ? 13. A multi-year exercise scheduling tool should be used to plan exercises. (1) ? If you disagree with this statement, why? |
| 17 | ? 16. A program should be developed to exercise Primary Response Action Contractors (PRACs), separately from Regulated Operators, for implementing response tactics. This would reduce the redundancy inherent in the current system. (2) ? How can PRAC’s be exercised to the benefit of multiple plan holders? |
| 18 | ? 16. A program should be developed to exercise Primary Response Action Contractors (PRACs), separately from Regulated Operators, for implementing response tactics. This would reduce the redundancy inherent in the current system. (2) ? What would be the disadvantages of such a program? |
| 19 | ? 11. In my experience, some exercise objectives are over exercised and some are not exercised enough. (2) ? Which exercise objectives are overused? Why? |
| 20 | ? 11. In my experience, some exercise objectives are over exercised and some are not exercised enough. (2) ? Which exercise objectives are underused? Why? |
| 21 | ? 12. A risk-based approach should be used to determine exercise requirements. (2) ? If you disagree with this statement, why? |
| 22 | ? 12. A risk-based approach should be used to determine exercise requirements. (2) ? What risk factors should be used to determine exercise requirements? |
| 23 | ? 15. An easily accessible statewide anonymous database of exercise lessons learned would be a useful tool. (2) ? If I had access to the lessons learned in other organizations exercises, I would use that information to _________. |
| 24 | ? 15. An easily accessible statewide anonymous database of exercise lessons learned would be a useful tool. (2) ? A lessons learned database would not be useful because ______. |
| 25 | ? ADEC has been asked to provide Operators with credits for conducting exercises. (2) ? How would a credit mechanism be beneficial to you? |
| 26 | ? ADEC has been asked to provide Operators with credits for conducting exercises. (2) ? What would a program like this look like? (Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 27 | ? Please list any additional topics (not covered in this session) that you feel are important for ADEC to consider as they make modifications to the Response Exercise Program |
| order | Group | Theme | 3. The ADEC Response Exercise Program helps improve my organization's ability to respond to an oil spill. (4) How does the current ADEC Response Exercise program help your organization improve its ability to respond do an oil spill? |
| 3 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Improve Relationships/Trust | · Develop relationships with agencies, PRACS, etc. (#27 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 4 | State and Federal Agencies | Practice/Training | - It helps us practice our roles in reviewing permits and providing oversight. (#94 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 5 | State and Federal Agencies | Practice/Training | · provide training for repsonse team (#28 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 6 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Improve Relationships/Trust | · Nelps build trust among various participants, (#29 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 7 | State and Federal Agencies | · having a regulators viewpoint is helpful (#30 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 8 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Improve Relationships/Trust | · good to meet ADEC folks in a non emergency situation (#31 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 9 | Crude Oil Facilities | Practice/Training | · Requires regular practice. (#32 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 10 | Refined Product Facilities | Areas to Improve | · identifying improvement opportunities (#33 | Refined Product Facilities) |
| 11 | Refined Product Facilities | Improve Relationships/Trust | · We would like to have regulatory personnel visit our sites and review regulations and give ideas to industry (#34 | Refined Product Facilities) |
| 12 | State and Federal Agencies | Practice/Training | · Helps industry understand the requirements of the State that would come out in a real response (#35 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 13 | Crude Oil Facilities | - It should but this tends to change from drill to drill. (#80 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 14 | State and Federal Agencies | Practice/Training | · It provides more training opportunities, especially for junior, less experienced personnel (#36 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 15 | Primary Response Action Contractors | Improve Relationships/Trust | · The drill & exercise program brings people from different organizations, municipalities and agencies. This team building is invaluable when we have to respond to a spill. (#37 | Primary Response Action Contractors) |
| 16 | State and Federal Agencies | Practice/Training | · Drills and exercises provide practice and continued learning for a spill response (#38 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 17 | State and Federal Agencies | Improve Relationships/Trust | · Facilitates relationship building, helps me better understand my role and expectations. (#39 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 18 | Primary Response Action Contractors | Does not understand Program | · The current program works well enough. Less than perfect but good enough. (#40 | Primary Response Action Contractors) |
| 19 | Crude Oil Facilities | Does not understand Program | - The current process is very confusing. (#97 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 20 | State and Federal Agencies | Does not understand Program | · There does not appear to be a program (#41 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 21 | State and Federal Agencies | Does not understand Program | - agreed. there is not a highly structured program. There is a long history of exercises required by DEC and that include their particiation and evaluation though. (#84 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 22 | Crude Oil Facilities | Improve Relationships/Trust | · establish relationships with agencies (#42 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 23 | Crude Oil Facilities | · requires operations and facilities to step outside normal operations and think about what could happen and response (#43 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 24 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | · Without having any guidance, this is a huge risk to meaning exprressed and unexpressed risk (#44 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 25 | Crude Oil Facilities | · Outside participants provide feedback. (#45 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 26 | Refined Product Facilities | Improve Relationships/Trust | · come to the facility and see whar's parctical and what's not (#46 | Refined Product Facilities) |
| 27 | Refined Product Facilities | Practice/Training | · helps personnel to understand their responsibilities and limits (#47 | Refined Product Facilities) |
| 28 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Improve Relationships/Trust | · If nothing else it allows all of the players to get to know each other and work together. (#48 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 29 | State and Federal Agencies | Testing/Evaluating | · Test capabilities (#49 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 30 | State and Federal Agencies | Does not understand Program | · We are a support and coordination agency, and we are not familiar with the program. (#50 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 31 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Practice/Training | · Practicing of roles (#51 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 32 | State and Federal Agencies | · Helps identify stakeholder concerns (#52 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 33 | Refined Product Facilities | · the realities of the business world versus planning standards (#53 | Refined Product Facilities) | |
| 34 | State and Federal Agencies | · provides clarity for regulated community on regulating agency's expectations. (#54 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 35 | State and Federal Agencies | · It provides a different perspective and highlights other areas of emphasis other than what my organization generally focuses on (#55 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 36 | State and Federal Agencies | Practice/Training | - Also affords mentoring opportunities, 'reality checks' and 'teaching moments' between response agencies (#99 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 37 | Crude Oil Facilities | Practice/Training | · Exposes newer response members to agency personnel - helps reduce perceived apprehension; provides a learning environment. (#56 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 38 | Crude Oil Facilities | Improve Relationships/Trust | · relationship building (#57 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 39 | Crude Oil Facilities | · Agencies assist during drill so that we may improve (#58 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 40 | Crude Oil Facilities | Improve Relationships/Trust | · We train as we fight to use an old military addage. It helps to bring teams together to work through the problem. (#59 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 41 | Refined Product Facilities | Improve Relationships/Trust | · familiarity with each other and responders (#60 | Refined Product Facilities) |
| 42 | State and Federal Agencies | Practice/Training | · Provides training for industry and develops further understanding of agencies roles/responsibilities during a response (#61 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 43 | State and Federal Agencies | Practice/Training | · forces responders to train and practice before an exercise (#62 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 44 | Refined Product Facilities | Practice/Training | - Our facilities train without agencies, but we look for better collaboration (#96 | Refined Product Facilities) |
| 45 | State and Federal Agencies | Improve Relationships/Trust | · develop partnerships and relationships ahead of a potential spill event. (#63 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 46 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Improve Relationships/Trust | · It's necessary for industry, agencies and stakeholders to train and exercise together in preparation for a real event. (#64 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 47 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Improve Relationships/Trust | · Allows face-to-face communication between industry and regulators about spill scenarios and potential responses (#65 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 48 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | · Having ADEC particiapate in a planned fashion with each person having a deliverable to help the IMT would be very helpful (#66 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 49 | State and Federal Agencies | · Allow agencies to discover what type of support the opperators and facilities need. (#67 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 50 | Crude Oil Facilities | Improve Relationships/Trust | · improved understanding of stakeholder expectations (#68 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 51 | Refined Product Facilities | Practice/Training | · helps identify training needs after an exercise - not practice unnecessary things (#69 | Refined Product Facilities) |
| 52 | State and Federal Agencies | Testing/Evaluating | · Identifies defecencies in contingency plans (#70 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 53 | Crude Oil Facilities | Testing/Evaluating | · helps to gain strengths and weaknesses in current response knowledge (#71 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 54 | State and Federal Agencies | Testing/Evaluating | · allows agencies to determine compliance (#72 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 55 | Crude Oil Facilities | · Findings are generally used as improvement opportunity and not punitive. (#73 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 56 | State and Federal Agencies | Testing/Evaluating | · test the repsonse organization and its consistency with the approved contingency plan, (#74 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 57 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | · Allows varying approaches and concerns to be brought forward and to be considered during a non spill event. (#75 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 58 | Crude Oil Facilities | Improve Relationships/Trust | · Team building (#76 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 59 | Crude Oil Facilities | Practice/Training | · improved understanding of response plan implementation (#77 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 60 | Crude Oil Facilities | NPREP | · National Preparedness for Response Exercise Program (PREP) is a volunteer program. Is ADEC Proposing a mandatory regulated program? (#78 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 61 | Crude Oil Facilities | NPREP | - It should align with NPREP (#103 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 62 | State and Federal Agencies | Improve Relationships/Trust | · Clarity is needed for required exercises as well as for mandated schedules. Opportunities for coordination between the agencies and regulated entities should be team building opportunities throughout industry and agencies (#79 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 63 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | · Presently ADEC has no publically available guidance for exercise design, other than 18 AAC 75.485 (Discharge Exercises). Rather, it would appear ADEC relies upon the federal oversight to invite ADEC to exercise design. When an ADEC representative integrates into the Exercise Design Team, they do not provide clear direction regarding the testing of the States Master Plan nor who will be participating in what role to assist with development any of the ADEC required plans [mentioned above]. However, they do bring evaluators to evaluate the effectiveness of the IMT to develop response plan with no baseline expectation. (#81 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 64 | Primary Response Action Contractors | NPREP | · Don't feel that it does. We follow PREP. (#82 | Primary Response Action Contractors) |
| 65 | State and Federal Agencies | Improve Relationships/Trust | · It provides additional experience interfacing with stakeholders and brings more clarity on how the process works. There more you do something the better you get at it and it becomes less stressful. (#83 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 66 | Crude Oil Facilities | · improved understanding of limitations and constraints (#85 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 67 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Improve Relationships/Trust | · Get to know expectations, personalities, etc in a non emergency (#86 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 68 | State and Federal Agencies | Improve Relationships/Trust | · gives stakeholders a level of trust that the state/fed/plan holders partnership is effective. (#87 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 69 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Testing/Evaluating | · Tests our ability to process information within our organization (#88 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 70 | Primary Response Action Contractors | Does not understand Program | · I'm not sure I understood the question. There is no state program that I'm aware of... PREP is what we generally use, but it's federal. (#89 | Primary Response Action Contractors) |
| 71 | Crude Oil Facilities | · Drill planning with agencies minimizes possible disruptions to operations. (#90 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 72 | State and Federal Agencies | Improve Relationships/Trust | · Help build relationships and know eachother's capabilities so that the when the real incident occurs, state and industry can work together more efficiently. (#91 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 73 | State and Federal Agencies | Testing/Evaluating | · Not the role of ADEC to improve an organizations ability to response rather to evaluate the adequacy of the response and provide feedback that the company can use (#92 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 74 | Crude Oil Facilities | · Contingecy Plans cover regulated requirements and we state the program we use. (#93 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 75 | Crude Oil Facilities | · Helps to understand the bigger picture of risks and collaboration state-wide. (#95 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 76 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Testing/Evaluating | · The focuse needs to remain on evaluating the plans. (#98 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 77 | State and Federal Agencies | · helps us meet out mandate to represent the public interests. (#100 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 78 | Crude Oil Facilities | · ADEC's role in drills is more than oberserve and evaluate. (#101 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 79 | Crude Oil Facilities | Improve Relationships/Trust | · understand view poiont of other stakehlolders (#102 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 80 | State and Federal Agencies | Testing/Evaluating | · Provides an additional oppertunity to test comms and tracking (#104 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| order | Group | Theme | 3. The ADEC Response Exercise Program helps improve my organization's ability to respond to an oil spill. (4) What do we keep? |
| 82 | Crude Oil Facilities | · schedule (#105 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 83 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · Joint planning of exercises (#106 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 84 | State and Federal Agencies | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · opportunties to build partnerships (#107 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 85 | State and Federal Agencies | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · Inclusion of ADEC in planning (#108 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 86 | State and Federal Agencies | - Agreed (#131 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 87 | State and Federal Agencies | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · Emphasis on inter-agency, inter-governmental cooperation (#109 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 88 | Primary Response Action Contractors | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · participation of other agencies (#110 | Primary Response Action Contractors) |
| 89 | Refined Product Facilities | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · relationship with plan reviewers (#111 | Refined Product Facilities) |
| 90 | Primary Response Action Contractors | · N/A (#112 | Primary Response Action Contractors) | |
| 91 | State and Federal Agencies | Does not understand Program | · N/A...since we have no idea what is in the cuurent program (#113 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 92 | Crude Oil Facilities | - Agreed. (#121 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 93 | Primary Response Action Contractors | - Agreed. (#128 | Primary Response Action Contractors) | |
| 94 | Refined Product Facilities | - agreed (#141 | Refined Product Facilities) | |
| 95 | Primary Response Action Contractors | Does not understand Program | - I think we need some clarification here on WHAT program were supposed to be commenting on! (#154 | Primary Response Action Contractors) |
| 96 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | - Agreed (#166 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 97 | Primary Response Action Contractors | · In-person participation at drills and exercises (#114 | Primary Response Action Contractors) | |
| 98 | State and Federal Agencies | - Agree (#135 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 99 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | - Agreed (#143 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 100 | State and Federal Agencies | - agreed. (#144 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 101 | Crude Oil Facilities | · Schedule flexibility (#115 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 102 | State and Federal Agencies | Does not understand Program | · Hard to say since there is not a program in place (#116 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 103 | Crude Oil Facilities | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · NGO participation (#117 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 104 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Evaluation criteria | · pass/fail methodology (#118 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 105 | Crude Oil Facilities | Evaluation criteria | - Not the pass/fail methodology (#138 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 106 | Refined Product Facilities | Evaluation criteria | - pass fail? keep lessons learned and collaborate on finding solutions. (#149 | Refined Product Facilities) |
| 107 | Refined Product Facilities | - Keep the lessons learned and improvements (#155 | Refined Product Facilities) | |
| 108 | Primary Response Action Contractors | - Not sure about this one. We don't favor pass/ fail methodology (#158 | Primary Response Action Contractors) | |
| 109 | Refined Product Facilities | Evaluation criteria | - strongly disagree - it's not pass/fail it's an exercise to learn (#185 | Refined Product Facilities) |
| 110 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Credits | · ability to use real response as 'credit' for a drill. (#119 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 111 | Crude Oil Facilities | - This is not a fleshed out process but should be. I have never had the department give me definitive "credit" for a response. (#146 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 112 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Credits | - Agree, seems ambiguous (#153 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 113 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · Joint planning (#120 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 114 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Does not understand Program | · What is the to keep....never can find documentation from either the AAC or from internal policy that no one can have access to. But on a postiive note, having participation from ADEC is critical (#122 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 115 | State and Federal Agencies | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · joint planning, in-person participation (#123 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 116 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | · know state budget crunch is tough, but important that ADEC folsk get the travel $$ etc to attend and participate. (#124 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 117 | Crude Oil Facilities | Staff training | · Maintain ADEC-led training programs for ADEC staff (#125 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 118 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Evaluation criteria | · focus on evaluating the plans and determining resposne readiness. (#126 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 119 | State and Federal Agencies | · Senior, experienced state personnel (#127 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 120 | Refined Product Facilities | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · collaborating with involved parties (#129 | Refined Product Facilities) |
| 121 | Crude Oil Facilities | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · participation of key stakeholders in planning process (#130 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 122 | State and Federal Agencies | - who are the key stakeholdes/ (#187 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 123 | Crude Oil Facilities | · timing (#132 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 124 | State and Federal Agencies | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · Participation of all available agencies during larger exercises (#133 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 125 | Crude Oil Facilities | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · Collaboration between agencies and regulated entities (#134 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 126 | Primary Response Action Contractors | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · Working together to plan execises (#136 | Primary Response Action Contractors) |
| 127 | State and Federal Agencies | · coordinated scheduling. (#137 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 128 | State and Federal Agencies | · collaboration and teamwork (#139 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 129 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Evaluation criteria | · I would like to see evaluation criteria in order to help plan an exerice - this help build a quality exercise (#140 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 130 | Crude Oil Facilities | - Agreed! (#162 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 131 | State and Federal Agencies | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · joint planning (#142 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 132 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | - Need some structure and expections...sent the right person to speak for the organziation is critical (#197 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 133 | State and Federal Agencies | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · Coordination for development of objectives and inputs. (#145 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 134 | State and Federal Agencies | · I would like to keep and develop a minimum deliverables list for table tops. (#147 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 135 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | · using X and drills to check reality against paper plans and try to make sure they match to a point (#148 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 136 | State and Federal Agencies | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · working wtih operators to reduce impact (#150 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 137 | Crude Oil Facilities | Embedding ADEC | · Ability of regulators to blend into the sections of an IMT, and be part of the team to solve the problem, not just observe and evaluate. It is a team event to solve a problem, and identification of who is to be part of section versus who is just there to observe and evaluate needs to be better defined. (#151 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 138 | State and Federal Agencies | Embedding ADEC | - agreed, agencies should be there to offer support to solve the problem. (#165 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 139 | Crude Oil Facilities | - AGree (#167 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 140 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | - I agree strongly. Having conversations/debates between regulators and industry about the pros and cons of various response options is critical to making a drill useful. (#176 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 141 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Unannounced Drills | · no notices drills need to remain a part of the exercise program. (#152 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 142 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | - agree (#157 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 143 | State and Federal Agencies | - Agree. (#161 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 144 | Crude Oil Facilities | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | - If it is to continue..greater proficiency in planning and delivering the exerise is needed (#195 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 145 | State and Federal Agencies | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · Joint exercise design principles (which allow multiple stakeholders to meet requirements/goals) (#156 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 146 | Crude Oil Facilities | - Agreed. A big event will bring out many entities. why not train that way as well? (#183 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 147 | Crude Oil Facilities | Field Deployments | · Opportunities to test equipment (#159 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 148 | Crude Oil Facilities | Communications | · communication between facility & agencies during drill (#160 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 149 | State and Federal Agencies | Joint Planning/Cooperation/Partnerships | · Local stakeholder involvement (#163 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 150 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Program Guidance/Definitions | · The current DEC program is only defined in the regulations and limited at best. The USCG NPREP program has been used traditionally in the past to assist in providing structure to drills and exercises, as well as obtaining exercise credits. DEC needs to clearly define their program to allow for predictability of drill (#164 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 151 | State and Federal Agencies | Program Guidance/Definitions | - Agree ADEC needs a tangible document, however NPREP should not be used a sole focus of an exercise when requested ODPCP credit (#178 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 152 | Crude Oil Facilities | - Agreed (#179 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 153 | Crude Oil Facilities | - Agreed. NPREP is not the end all, do all. (#193 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 154 | State and Federal Agencies | Program Guidance/Definitions | · Agree, important to have clear goals and scheduling that works for key participants. (#168 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 155 | Crude Oil Facilities | NPREP/HSEEP | · Adopt PREP and HSEEP (#169 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 156 | Crude Oil Facilities | - agree (#173 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 157 | Crude Oil Facilities | - Agreed (#177 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 158 | Refined Product Facilities | - Agree (#181 | Refined Product Facilities) | |
| 159 | Crude Oil Facilities | - Agreed (#182 | Crude Oil Facilities) | |
| 160 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | NPREP/HSEEP | - HSEEP is not the only or best method to plan exericse. PREP is great for tracking, but HSEEP has a long ways to go (#189 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 161 | Crude Oil Facilities | NPREP/HSEEP | - ADEC should adopt NPREP (#196 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 162 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | - Agree (#199 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 163 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Unannounced Drills | · No notice drills give a good snapshot and are maybe easier to "plan" in many ways b/c they don;t ivolve the?months of prep from the multitude of folks involved. IE; more potential bang for buck (#170 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 164 | State and Federal Agencies | Minimum requirements | · A minimum requirement of exercise for regulated facilities. (#171 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 165 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Evaluation criteria | · Atmosphere of learning vs pass fail. Although at some point a pass fail should be considered to establish how effecticve the plan holder's drill program is (#172 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 166 | State and Federal Agencies | NPREP/HSEEP | · NPREP doent neet DEC needs completey. (#174 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 167 | Primary Response Action Contractors | - How so? (#186 | Primary Response Action Contractors) | |
| 168 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | · Longer duration exercises should be part of the program to insure that all of the logistics arrangements necessary for a resposne are evaluated (#175 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 169 | State and Federal Agencies | - agreed. (#184 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 170 | State and Federal Agencies | - Yes, agreed. And it would be nice to start out a larger exercise remotely. (#201 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 171 | State and Federal Agencies | Realism | · Keep drills more realistic, with real time events and injections (#180 | State and Federal Agencies) |
| 172 | Crude Oil Facilities | Unannounced Drills | · accept actual spills as unannounced drills (#188 | Crude Oil Facilities) |
| 173 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | - agree (#191 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 174 | Primary Response Action Contractors | - agree (#200 | Primary Response Action Contractors) | |
| 175 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Multi-year schedule | · Multi year drill development (#190 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 176 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | · fields deployments are as important as tabletop exercises (#192 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 177 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | - agree (#198 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) | |
| 178 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | Unannounced Drills | · Unannounced drill- truly unannounced! (#194 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
| 179 | State and Federal Agencies | · focused goals and objectives (#202 | State and Federal Agencies) | |
| 180 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders | · Flexibility in allowing multiple entities to drill operators (#203 | Other Drill and Exercise Stakeholders) |
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.
