jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Excel Sheet Download 28040 | F15 Fmea Checklist


 299x       Filetype XLSX       File size 0.09 MB       Source: www.zf.com


File: Excel Sheet Download 28040 | F15 Fmea Checklist
sheet 1 qd83 form f215 check list for fmea evaluation supplier company address date zf part no revision level part description content 0 general requirements 1 organization 2 structure analysis ...

icon picture XLSX Filetype Excel XLSX | Posted on 03 Aug 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial file snippet.
Sheet 1: QD83 Form F2.15

Check list for FMEA evaluation
Supplier
Company

Address

Date

ZF Part No. / Revision Level



Part description




Content
0. General requirements
1. Organization
2. Structure analysis
3. Function and failure analysis
4. Analysis of evaluation
5. Action analysis
6. Failure simulation
7. Optimization
0 General requirements Evaluation (green/yellow/red)
0.1 Have all process steps in the FMEA been taken into account and evaluated from the process flowchart / work plan?


0.2 Have all internal complaints been analyzed and taken into account for the last 6 months?


0.3 Have all customer complaints (8D) of the last 12 months been analyzed and taken into account?


0.4 Have all replacement and avoidance processes been taken into account and evaluated in the FMEA?


0.5 Has the process been analyzed for the segregation of not ok parts and are this failure modes evaluated in the FMEA?


1 Organization
1.1 Has the need for action to conduct an FMEA been identified by a systematic procedure?


1.2 Have the objectives and inspection scope been determined for the FMEA?


1.3 Was the FMEA started at the right time and carried out in coordination with the project plan?


1.4 Have the FMEA responsibilities for the inspected scopes been appointed?


1.5 Has the preperation of the FMEA been firmly integrated in the development/production/project plan and have resources been appointed?


1.6 Have team members been appointed by name with functions, and have the tasks, such as moderation, action tracing, documentation, updating and escalation, been assigned?


1.7 Does the state of the FMEA reflect the current product / process status?


1.8 Has the interface coordination and the distribution and archiving of, and the access to the documentation been regulated?


1.9 Have the sub-suppliers been universally integrated in terms of the FMEA preperation?


1.10 Has the type of documentation and the media been determined?


1.11 Have the symbols for the special characteristics of the organization been determined?


2 Structure analysis
2.1 Is a tracebale process description available, and are the requierements completely recorded/known?


2.2 Have the boundaries of the inspection been clearly determined within the structure?


2.3 Have interfaces been defined and coordinated?


2.4 Has the inspection scope in terms of depth of inspection been represented in a clearly comprehensible way?


3 Function and failure analysis
3.1 Have the functions been completely specified according to the objectives?


3.2 Have the functions been described in a way that can be verified and validated?


3.3 Have the failures been completely derived from the functions in accordance with the objectives?


3.4 Have the failures been significantly and comprehensively described?


4 Analysis of evaluation
4.1 Was the ZF ranking catalog used for the assessment of severity / occurance / detection according to DCF 17-02 "Special Characteristics"?


4.2 Is the effect of failures known or questioned in case of unclear assessment at ZF?


5 Action analysis
5.1 Have preventive and detection actions been specified for all failure causes, failures and/or their failure modes?


5.2 Have the actions been phrased comprehensively and clearly?


5.3 Is the status of all actions specified and current?


5.4 Have responsibilities and deadlines been specified for all actions?


5.5 Are actions executed that they can be implemented with regards to product development, process or service planning at the latest until the initial sampling?


5.6 Are there ranking standards for S, O and D available?


5.7 Are there distinctions between product- and process-specific assessment criteria?


5.8 Are the ranking standards agreed with ZF?


5.9 Are the ranking standards applied continiously in the FMEA?


5.10 Have O and D rankings been updated after impelementation of actions for all failure causes?


5.11 Have all actions been implemented and has the effectiveness been checked and documented?


6 Failure simulation
6.1 Has a failure simulation been carried out in the line to demonstrate the effectiveness of the actions?


6.2 Did an analysis of possible malfunctions, which are not yet contained in the FMEA, take place during the failure simulation?


7
7.1 Were new actions decided in the case of unacceptable results?


7.2 Have the new actions been implemented and has their effectiveness been checked and documented?


7.3 Was the risk evaluation updated after implementation of new actions?


7.4 Have the FMEA results been communicated?


7.5 Has the FMEA documentation been archived?


7.6 Is the FMEA regularly updated in review?


7.7 Is the FMEA updated in case of complaints (required in the 8D report)?



Failed, containment actions and action plans necessary: (min. 15 X yellow, or 1 X red)



Actions necessary: (max. 14 X yellow, and 0 X red)



FMEA - self assessment / audit passed: (max. 7 X yellow, and 0 X red)


Evaluation The columns must be filled with "1". 0 0 0
Result Audit passed






Date Supplier, Dept. Supplier Signature




The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Sheet qd form f check list for fmea evaluation supplier company address date zf part no revision level description content general requirements organization structure analysis function and failure of action simulation optimization greenyellowred have all process steps in the been taken into account evaluated from flowchart work plan internal complaints analyzed last months customer d replacement avoidance processes has segregation not ok parts are this modes need to conduct an identified by a systematic procedure objectives inspection scope determined was started at right time carried out coordination with project responsibilities inspected scopes appointed preperation firmly integrated developmentproductionproject resources team members name functions tasks such as moderation tracing documentation updating escalation assigned does state reflect current product status interface distribution archiving access regulated subsuppliers universally terms type media symbols special characteris...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.