143x Filetype PDF File size 1.04 MB Source: www.wildlifetourism.org.au
NEGA NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF WILDLIFE TOURISM ON WILDLIFE BRISBANE Tourism Engineering, Design and Technology Research TIVE Dr David Lockington Ph: 07 3365 4054 DARWIN CAIRNS d.lockington@uq.edu.au EFFECTS Northern Territory Node Cairns Node IT & Informatics Research Coordinator Coordinator Dr Pramod Sharma Ms Alicia Boyle Prof Philip Pearce Ph: 07 3365 6513 Ph: 08 8946 6084 Ph: 07 4781 4762 p.sharma@uq.edu.au OF alicia.boyle@ntu.edu.au philip.pearce@jcu.edu.au Sustainable Tourism Services Mr Stewart Moore WILDLIFE Managing Director Ph: 07 3211 4726 sts@crctourism.com.au Education Program Coordinator Dr John Fien TOURISM Ph: 07 3875 7105 j.fien@mailbox.gu.edu.au GOLDCOAST ON Chief Executive Prof Terry De Lacy WILDLIFE Ph: 07 5552 8172 t.delacy@mailbox.gu.edu.au Conservation and Environmental Management Research Prof Ralf Buckley Ph: 07 5552 8675 r.buckley@mailbox.gu.edu.au By PERTH ADELAIDE Ronda Western Australia South Australia Node Node Coordinator Coordinator Prof Jack Carlsen Prof Graham Brown LISMORE Green Ph: 08 9266 1132 Ph: 08 8302 0313 Centre for Regional CarlsenJ@cbs.curtin.edu.au graham.brown@unisa.edu.au Tourism Research Prof Peter Baverstock and CANBERRA Ph: 02 6620 3809 Industry Extension Coordinator MELBOURNE pbaverst@scu.edu.au Karen Mr Peter O’Clery SYDNEY Ph: 02 6230 2931 Director of Research poclery@iprimus.com.au Prof Leo Jago New South Wales Higginbottom Australian Capital Territory Ph: 03 9688 5055 Node Coordinator Node Coordinator Leo.jago@vu.edu.au Mr Tony Griffin Prof Trevor Mules Ph: 02 9514 5103 Ph: 02 6201 5016 tony.griffin@uts.edu.au tjm@comedu.canberra.edu.au LAUNCESTON International Program Tasmania Node Coordinator Co-ordinator Prof Trevor Sofield Dr Johannes Bauer By Ronda Green and Karen Higginbottom Ph: 03 6324 3578 Ph: 02 6338 4284 trevor.sofield@utas.edu.au jbauer@csu.edu.au WILDLIFE TOURISM RESEARCH REPORT SERIES: NO. 5 Status Assessment of Wildlife Tourism in Australia Series RESEARCH REPORT SERIES The Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism was established under the Australian The primary aim of CRC Tourism’s research report series is technology transfer. Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program to underpin the development of a The reports are targeted toward both industry and government users and tourism dynamic, internationally competitive, and sustainable tourism industry. researchers. The content of this technical report series primarily focuses on Our mission: Developing and managing intellectual property (IP) to deliver innovation to applications, but may also advance research methodology and tourism theory. business, community and government to enhance the environmental, economic and social The report series titles relate to CRC Tourism’s research program areas. All research sustainability of tourism. reports are peer reviewed by at least two external reviewers. For further information DEVELOPING OUR IP 5. Post graduate education on the report series, access the CRC website, [www.crctourism.com.au]. Director of Research - Prof Bill Faulkner Coordinator – Dr John Fien 1.Tourism environmental (j.fien@mailbox.gu.edu.au) Wildlife Tourism Report Series, Editor: Dr Karen Higginbottom management research 6. Centre for Tourism and Risk This series presents research findings from projects within the Wildlife Tourism Co-ordinator – Prof Ralf Buckley Management Subprogram of the CRC. The Subprogram aims to provide strategic knowledge to (r.buckley@mailbox.gu.edu.au ) Director – Prof Jeffrey Wilks facilitate the sustainable development of wildlife tourism in Australia. • Wildlife Tourism (j.wilks@mailbox.uq.edu.au ) • Mountain Tourism 7.Centre for Regional Tourism Status Assessment of Australian Wildlife Tourism, Editorial Team: • Nature Tourism Research Dr Karen Higginbottom, Ms Kelley Rann, A/Prof Derrin Davis • Adventure Tourism Director – Prof Dick Braithwaite 2.Tourism engineering design and (dbraithw@scu.edu.au) This report is one in a series comprising a status assessment of wildlife tourism in eco-technology research MANAGING OUR IP Australia. It comprises the initial stages of research undertaken by the Wildlife Coordinator – Dr David Lockington General Manager – Ian Pritchard Tourism Subprogram of the CRC. Reports in this series cover various disciplinary (d.lockington@mailbox.uq.edu.au) (ian@crctourism.com.au) perspectives (visitors, economics, hosts, wildlife management) as well as various • Coastal and marine infrastructure and 1.IP register subsectors (such as zoos, bird watching and hunting). Together, the reports systems 2.Technology transfer identify the current status and key issues facing Australian wildlife tourism, and • Coastal tourism ecology 3.Commercialisation make recommendations to enhance its sustainability. • Waste management 4.Destination management products • Physical infrastructure, design and 5.Executive training National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data construction 6.Delivering international services 3.Tourism policy, products and 7.Spin-off companies Green, Ronda business research • Sustainable Tourism Holdings Coordinator – A/Prof Leo Jago CEO – Peter O’Clery The negative effects of wildlife tourism on wildlife (Leo.jago@vu.edu.au) (poclery@interact.net.au) • Consumers and marketing • National Centre for Tourism Bibliography. • Events and sports tourism Managing Director – Stewart Moore ISBN 1 876685 31 X. • Tourism economics and policy (nct@uq.net.au) • Strategic management • Green Globe Asia Pacific 1. Ecotourism - Environmental aspects - Australia. 2. Wildlife conservation - Australia. • Regional tourism CEO – Graeme Worboys 3. Wildlife-related recreation - Australia. I. Higginbottom, Karen. II. Cooperative • Indigenous tourism (graeme.worboys@ggasiapacific.com.au ) Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism. III. Title. (Series : Wildlife tourism research 4.E-travel and tourism research report (Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism) ; no. 5). Coordinator – Dr Pramod Sharma For more information contact: (p.sharma @mailbox.uq.edu.au ) Communications Manager – Brad Cox 338.479194 • Electronic product & destination CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd marketing and selling Griffith University, PMB 50 © 2001 Copyright CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd • IT for travel and tourism online GOLD COASTMC, Qld 9726 All rights reserved. No parts of this report may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval development Ph: +61 7 5552 8116, Fax: +61 7 5552 8171 system or transmitted in any form or by means of electronic, mechanical, photocopying, • Rural and regional tourism online Visit: www.crctourism.com.au or email: ctourism.com.au recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Any enquiries development Brad@cr should be directed to CRC for Sustainable Tourism [info@crctourism.com.au]. • E-business innovation in sustainable travel and tourism EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Aims This report reviews the mechanisms by which wildlife tourism can have negative effects on wildlife and the management practices that can be used to mitigate these effects, with a focus on practices relevant to Australia. It identifies areas of research most urgently needed to determine the effects that may result from wildlife tourism and related activities. It then recommends some basic guidelines for management techniques and processes to minimise negative effects while continuing to cater to visitor satisfaction and other needs of the tourism industry. Key Issues Wildlife tourism is often considered environmentally friendly because it is expected that those who want to see wildlife will also be concerned with conservation and animal welfare. Further, there are many ways in which wildlife tourism can actually make positive contributions to conservation. However, it also has the potential to have various negative effects on animal populations, behaviour and/or welfare. These need to be understood if they are to be effectively minimised. A search of local and international literature, coupled with interviews with personnel from Australian government conservation agencies, identified many potential and actual problems. The negative effects of wildlife tourism and related human activities on wildlife can be grouped into three main categories: (1) disruption of activity, (2) direct killing or injury, and (3) habitat alteration (including provision of food). The extent of negative impacts on wildlife can vary enormously depending on species, life-cycle stages, habitats and other variables. Examples of disruption of activity include spotlighting, noisy activities, and the approach of tourists towards animals that are foraging or caring for their young. When a human disrupts the activities of wildlife, the response will be either avoidance behaviour where the wildlife will flee or hide, habituation where there is a learned lack of i response to humans to the point of seeming to ignore their presence, or attraction – usually in expectation of food. The extent to which an animal is likely to be affected by human activities will be influenced by a number of factors. These include the amount and type of previous contact with humans, the means of transport used by visitors, the predictability of the human activity, the openness of habitat, the nature of the animal’s activity and whether it has dependent offspring. Far too little is currently known about the effects of hand- feeding and spotlighting, and the effects of tourism activity generally on shy cryptic species. Death or injury can occur as the result of unintentional events such as road accidents, or from intentional acts of hunting, fishing and collecting. Hunting, fishing and collecting (whether by tourists or souvenir sellers) require careful regulation formulated under advice from wildlife ecologists familiar with the practices and the animals in question. The unintentional trampling of wildlife (e.g. eggs of ground- nesting birds), deliberate killing for safety reasons, (e.g. snakes), the use of insecticides for tourist comfort, and the burning of forest understorey for firebreaks (especially during breeding season) can also directly cause wildlife mortality. The most obvious occurrence of habitat alteration happens when land is cleared or modified to make room for the infrastructure needed for tourism activities. Changes to habitat also occur from off-road vehicle damage and humans trampling on vegetation. Intentional and accidental provision of food can also be seen as a form of habitat alteration. These changes can result in significant increases or decreases in population numbers, reduction of protection from predators and the weather, or reduction of prey species. If one species increases markedly in numbers, this may have negative impacts on other species within the ecosystem. Some hand-fed animals may become aggressive and a danger to tourists. Determining the magnitude of impacts and deciding whether they are positive, negative or neutral can be a difficult task. For example, what is positive for one species may be negative or neutral for another or the ecosystem in general. What is positive in an ecological sense may be negative in terms of effects on species’ behaviour. The assessment of impacts will also vary according to the goals of the human activity ii
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.