146x Filetype PDF File size 0.29 MB Source: multisite.itb.ac.id
Available online at: http://journal.unila.ac.id/index.php/tropicalsoil DOI: 10.5400/jts.2012.17.2.173 J Trop Soils, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2012 : 173-180 173 Ecological Diversity of Soil Fauna as Ecosystem Engineers in Small-Holder Cocoa Plantation in South Konawe 1* 2 3 Laode Muhammad Harjoni Kilowasid , Tati Suryati Syamsudin , Franciscus Xaverius Susilo 2 and Endah Sulistyawati 1Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Haluoleo University, Kendari 93232, Indonesia, 2 School of Life Science and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia, 3 Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Lampung University, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia * Corresponding author. lohardjoni2@yahoo.co.id Telp./Fax.: 0401-391692 Received 31 March 2012 / accepted 9 May 2012 ABSTRACT Taxa diversity within soil fauna functional groups can affected ecosystem functioning such as ecosystem engineers, which influence decomposition and nutrient cycling. The objective of this study is to describe ecological diversity variation within soil fauna as ecosystem engineers in soil ecosystem of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) plantation. Sampling was conducted during one year period from five different ages of plantation. Soil fauna removed from soil core using hand sorting methods. A total of 39 genera of soil fauna as ecosystem engineers were found during these studies. Thirty five genera belong to the group of Formicidae (ants), three genera of Isoptera (termites), and one genera of Oligochaeta (earthworms). Ecological diversity variation within ecosystem engineers was detected with Simpson indices for dominance and evenness. The highest diversity of ecosystem engineers was in the young age of plantation. This study reinforces the importance biotic interaction which contributed to the distribution and abundance within soil fauna community as ecosystem engineers in small-holder cocoa plantation. Keywords: Cocoa, diversity, ecosystem engineers, small-holder, soil fauna INTRODUCTION categorized as ecosystem engineers by its connection with their role to modify soil properties, In terrestrial ecosystem, explanation impact of and provide an available substrate for microbial human activity on biodiversity mostly dominated (Jones et al. 1994). Some studies used soil fauna as by the studies from aboveground communities ecosystem engineers for ecosystem restoration (Butt (Hooper et al. 2005). Currently, the new approach et al. 1995; Butt 1999; Byers et al. 2006). Earlier proposed by Parker (2010) that biodiversity should researchers in tropical environment were reported not considered only on the number of species but that earthworm, termites, or ant species had different also functional groups of the species in the effect on soil properties (structure and aggregate) community. In fact, belowground ecosystem and e.g. Blanchart et al. (1997); Decaëns et al. (2002); functional group of species was neglected, because and Hedde et al. (2005). Further, Barois and Lavele of the absence of direct economical values (Decaens (1986) found a mutualistic relationship between 2006) and ‘charismatic’ species of soil fauna (Susilo micro flora and earthworms (Pontoscolex et al. 2004). corethrurus) of exploitation organic complex in the The soil fauna has an indirect effect on tropical soil. Straube et al. (2009) reported that the economical values through their functional groups presence of Dendrobaena octaedra and Octolasion activity such as ecosystem engineers (Decaens et tyrtaeum had different impact on density and al. 2006). Some experimental studies showed that diversity of soil micro arthropod, and Dauber et al. soil fauna diversity strongly related to decomposition (2008) reported that the presence of ant stimulated and nutrient cycling through their functional groups increasing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) activities as detritivorous, omnivorous, predator, or density in grasses roots around. The change within ecosystem engineers (Swift et al. 2004). The soil soil fauna community (as ecosystem engineers) fauna including ants, earthworms, and termites are could be influenced on soil structure, and activity of soil microbe and micro-arthropod, which will regulate on nutrient cycling in the soil (Osler and J Trop Soils, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2012: 173-180 Sommerkorn 2007). Consequently it will affect plant productivity including fruit, grain, flower, fiber, ISSN 0852-257X LMH Kilowasid et al.: Ecological Diversity of Soil Fauna in Cocoa Plantation 174 medicinal plant, oil, etc (Benckiser and Schnell 2007). districts in South Konawe District, South East Sulawesi, 0 0 These facts indicate the importance of soil fauna which were located at 040 7’04.9’’ - 040 8’50.5’’ South diversity as ecosystem engineers in regulation and latitude and 122015’02.8’’ - 122031’40.5’’ East maintenance of stability of soil biota community, longitude. The rainfall average of the area study was -1 0 including as an indicator of soil quality and soil 175.58 mm month , and air temperature was 26.74 C, biological classification. this data was obtained from weather station of Wolter In Indonesia, cocoa plantations cover about 1.75 Monginsidi Port Kendari. The topography of the area millions ha, and 1.64 millions ha are belong to small- was with slope of 0 – 3%. Soil type in the area studies holder farm (Directorate General of Estate, were included in Dystrudepts Typical sub-group (Soil Agricultural Ministry, Republic of Indonesia 2011) Survey Staff 2010). and most of the studies on belowground soil fauna Samples Collection and Experimental Designs in cocoa plantation (cocoa agroforestry) focus on its importance on conserving biodiversity (Delabie Determination of study site was conducted on et al. 2007; Moco et al. 2009; Shahabuddin 2010). April 2009 by surveying different age of small holder The study on the important of the behavior of soil cocoa plantation and it was decided to work on five fauna as functional group in different age of cocoa different ages of plantation, that were 4, 5, 7, 10, plantation is neglected. The objective of this study and 16 age-years (Figure 1). In each site (different was to describe ecological diversity variation within age of plantation), samples were taken from the area soil fauna as ecosystem engineers in the small holder of 0.25 ha (50 m x 50 m). In each area it were cocoa plantation. Pricesely, (i) to find out soil fauna taken four soil corers with distance between one diversity as ecosystem engineers in different age of soil core and others were away of 10 m following cocoa plantation; (ii) to find out the ecological the experimental design at Figure 2. Soil fauna was diversity measurements for different habitat (age collected by soil cores by cylindrical stainless steel of cocoa plantation); and (ii) to find out the diversity core with 20 cm in diametre and 15 cm in soil depth. status of ecosystem engineers in different habitat. Samples were collected at five times during one year period at 15 August 2009, 21 November 2009, MATERIALS AND METHODS 26 January 2010, 22 April 2010, and 13 June 2010. The soil fauna was removed from soil core using Study Site hand sorting methods and preserved in 70% alcohol. This study was conducted in smallholder farmer Identification was conducted following identification cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) plantation which was guide from Hashimoto (2010) for ants, James (2000) extensively managed at Konda and Mowila sub- for earthworms, and Tho (1992) for termites. Due to the limitation of key to species level, identification 122015’0”E 122020’0”E 122025’0”E 122030’0”E S POASIA S LOCATION OF THE STUDY ” ” 0 0 ’ ’ N 0 00 04 PONDIDAHA 4 W E SAMPARA S MANDONGA 2,500 1,250 0 2,500 Meters SCALE 1:110,000 LOCATION INDEX SOUTH EAST SULAWESI S SOUTH EAST SULAWESI RANOMETO S ” PROVINCE ” 0 0 ’ ’ 05 5 4 04 LANDONO LEGEND AGE OF SMALL-HOLDER COCOA PLANTATION 0 0 KONDA 4 year : (long : 122 31’01.7”E, Lat : 04 08’33.2”S) 0 0 5 year : (long : 122 30’41.04”E, Lat : 04 08’50.5”S) SOUTH KONAWE 0 0 DISTRICT 7 year : (long : 122 30’47.7”E, Lat : 04 08’44.4”S) 0 0 10 year : (long : 122 31’40.5”E, Lat : 04 08’34.4”S) 0 0 16 year : (long : 122 15’02.8”E, Lat : 04 07’’04.9”S) S S ” ” 0 0 ’ ’ 0 0 01 LAMBUYA 01 4 4 PALANGGA TINANGGEA LAINEA 122015’0”E 122020’0”E 122025’0”E 122030’0”E Figure 1. Sampling site of the research. J Trop Soils, Vol. 17, No. 2, 2012 : 173-180 175 10 m 10 Nov.21, Aug.15, m 2009 2009 m 0 Jun.13, 5 2010 Jan.26, Apr.22, 2010 2010 50 m Figure 2. Experimental designs for soil fauna sampling. Notes: sampling point. was done up to genera and it was also used for as ecosystem engineers was collected from the analysis of richness, dominance, and evenness. The different age of cocoa plantation. Three groups of data of each genera was transformed into number soil fauna which were categorized as ecosystem per square metre. engineers were ants, termites, and earthworms. Measures of Ecological Diversity and From the total of genera of soil fauna were 35 of Statistical Analysis genera belong to Formicidae (ants), three genera of Isoptera (termites), and one genera of Oligochaeta To measure ecological diversity were used (earthworms). The highest richness was 22 genera genera richness, and the indices from Shannon, found in plantation aged 4 years and the lowest Simpson, and Camargo for dominance, evenness, was 12 genera found in plantation aged 5 years (Table diversity, and uniformity. Every of indices were 1). In Table 2 it shows ants from the genera of calculated using the formula of Camargo (2008). Solenopsis, Harpegnathos, Platythyrea, and Univariate analysis of variance was used to detect Proceratium, and earthworm from the genera of variations in the value of the indices of ecological Pontoscolex found at all age of plantation. Ants from diversity among different age of cocoa plantation. genera of Neivamyrmex, Euprenolepis, Comparison of each value of measures of ecological Crematogaster, Olygomyrmex, Brachyponera, diversity among different age of the cacao plantation Cryptopone, and Mesoponera were found at the was conducted with the Duncan test at the p < 0.05 younger age of plantation (between 4-5years age). level. Leptothorax, Oecophylla, Atta, and Ponera were RESULTS AND DISCUSSION found at the midle age of plantation (7 years), and Amblypone, Camponatus, Ephebomyrmex, Genera Richness of Soil Fauna as Ecosystem Liometoprum, Pseudolasius and Veromesor were Engineers found at the old plantation (10-16 years old). For termites, genera of Coptotermes and During one year period of the research, a total Pericapritermes were found in the plantation aged of 828 individual consisting of 39 genera of soil fauna of 4, 10, and 16 years, while the Hypotermes was Table 1. Number of genera of the soil fauna as ecosystem engineers from different age of small-holder cocoa plantation. Taxa 4 year 5 year 7 year 10 year 16 year Ants 19 11 13 16 13 Termites 2 - 1 2 3 Earthworms 1 1 1 1 1 Total 22 12 15 19 17 Age class: 4 and 5 year = young plantation, 7 year = middle plantation, and 10 and 16 year = old plantation. LMH Kilowasid et al.: Ecological Diversity of Soil Fauna in Cocoa Plantation 176 only found in the oldest of the plantation (16 year). These phenomena are very commonly observed in For earthworms, only Pontoscolex was found in all the plantation areas in tropical regions (Moco et al. age of the plantations. 2009; Turner and Foster 2009). The dominance of The results showed that the richness of the ant ants in the soil macro-fauna community were caused genera was higher than termites and earthworms. by a number of functional properties of them, Table 2. Ants, termites, and earthworms collected from different age of small-holder cocoa plantation. Genera Age of cocoa plantation (years) 4 5 7 10 16 Ants Liometoprum - - - 1 - Tapinoma 1 1 - 1 - Neivamyrmex 1 - - - - Camponatus - - - 1 - Euprenolepis 1 1 - - - Oecophylla - - 1 - - Pseudolasius - - - - 1 Cardiocondela 1 - - 1 - Crematogaster 1 - - - - Ephebomyrmex - - - 1 - Leptothorax - - 1 - - Monomorium - - 1 1 - Olygomyrmex - 1 - - - Pheidole 1 - 1 - 1 Pogonomyrmex 1 - - 1 - Prystomyrmex 1 1 - - 1 Solenopsis 1 1 1 1 1 Tetramorium 1 - - 1 - Veromesor - - - - 1 Amblypone - - - 1 - Atta - - 1 - - Brachyponera 1 - - - - Centromyrmex 1 - 1 1 1 Cryptopone 1 - - - - Discothyrea - 1 - - 1 Emyryopone 1 1 - - 1 Hypoponera 1 - 1 1 - Mesoponera 1 - - - - Harpegnathos 1 1 1 1 1 Pachycondyla - 1 - - 1 Platythyrea 1 1 1 1 1 Ponera - - 1 - - Prionopelta - - - - 1 Proceratium 1 1 1 1 1 Pseudomyrmex - - 1 1 - Termites Coptotermes 1 - 1 1 1 Hypotermes - - - - 1 Pericapritermes 1 - - 1 1 Earthworms Pontoscolex 1 1 1 1 1 Notes: (-) absent, (1) present.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.