315x Filetype PDF File size 3.14 MB Source: core.ac.uk
A BLENDED LEARNING MODEL IN HIGHER EDUCATION:
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF BLENDED LEARNING
IN UK AND MALAYSIA
ESYIN CHEW
A submission presented in partial fulfilment of the
requirements of the University of Glamorgan/Prifysgol Morgannwg
for the degree of Doctoral of Philosophy
July 2009
Abstract
Abstract
Blended learning, involves the combination of two fields of concern: technology and
education; or two groups of people: technologists and educationists. However,
current literature shows less consideration on the potential disciplinary gap in the
blended learning experience, as a result there is a paucity of evidence from cross-
country/institutional/disciplinary investigations. This study aimed to explore, analyse
and compare the blended learning experience in higher education. The research is
reflected in 3 questions: (1) What are the current blended learning experiences in the
selected higher educational institutions? (2) How such experience varies in different
disciplines? (3) What are the reflections on the comparative experiences in (1) and
(2)? The qualitative case study with comparative methods was used to obtain in-
depth findings for these research questions. I visited 4 universities in two countries
and sampled 51 research participants’ voices from contrasting disciplines. With
these voices, I thoroughly discussed individual case studies, followed by a cross-
case and cross-discipline comparison. These findings enabled insights to be drawn
on a major argument: blended learning did enable and enhance learning
experiences in all case studies but disciplinary differences remain a major challenge.
The analysis shows that academics from science-based disciplines have an
advantage at the instrumental level of technological usage without transforming
learning experience; social science-based academics, due to their disciplinary nature,
have embedded technology in wider trans-technical aspects that would enhance and
transform learning and teaching. In the context of blended learning, I would argue
that learning has not been enhanced (1) if the technology is the sole focus; (2) if the
research effort of “technology enhanced learning” does not gain ground in
educational theories and (3) does not recognise the disciplinary differences. Arising
out of these findings, I proposed a blended learning model that indicates the
boundary of the current literature and research findings, and a blended learning
definition - an educational-focused process to enhance and transform f2f learning
with the blend of technology in a symbiotic relationship. It is necessary for
educationists and technologists to establish such a symbiotic relationship and the
inter-disciplinary integration and discourse, that may impact on the individuals’
practice beyond their own disciplinary territory.
i
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements
Completing a PhD is truly a marathon event - restless weekends and sleepless nights but a
valuable process (as I said in the closing notes that it has rocked me to my core!) I would
not have been able to complete this journey without the support of countless people over the
past three years.
I must first express my sincere gratitude towards my Director of Studies, Professor Norah
Jones, the Head of the Centre of Excellence for Learning and Teaching. Her constant
support, loving attention, valuable leadership, numberless suggestions and academic
scholarship have set an example I hope to match some day.
My great appreciation is due to my supervisor, Professor David Turner, the Professor in
Education who made critical comments and provided constructive advice, taking intense
academic interest in this study that enhances the quality of the research and transforms my
epistemology.
Special gratitude goes to Haydn Blackey, my line manager for providing numerous ideas and
useful discussions, instilling in me confidence and a drive for pursuing my PhD. My heartfelt
thanks to Denize McIntyre’s precious time and kind effort for proofreading my final
manuscripts – I am deeply indebted to her. Special thanks to my examiners, Professor Peter
Hartley and Professor Michael Connolly, for their scholarly discussion and constructive
criticism to make this piece of work complete. I also thank my shepherds and fellow friends
from CELT, CCCC, PJ Logos and GCCF. They helped and encouraged me especially when
the good times were not; they have made my life abroad more interesting and meaningful.
My special appreciation goes to my beloved parents, both Chew and Tan’s family members,
especially daddy, mummy, Enoch, Siok Hwee, Epet, Limin, uncle Jim and uncle George,
who always kept me away from family responsibilities and encouraged me to concentrate on
my study.
Finally, I would like to express the most gratitude to my other half - Chian Hong Tan. He
helped me to concentrate on completing this thesis by doing all the housework and
supported me both spiritually and physically. Without his loving and thoughtful company, this
study would not have been completed. May all the gratefulness, glory and praises first be to
the Creator, my Lord Jesus Christ!
ii
Form Decl
UNIVERSITY OF GLAMORGAN
PRIFYSGOL MORGANNWG
(This form should be typewritten)
Candidate’s Declaration Form
Note: This form must be submitted to the University with the candidate’s thesis (10.5 of the
Regulations refers)
Name of Candidate: Esyin Chew
Degree for which thesis is submitted: Degree of Doctoral of Philosophy - A
Blended Learning Model in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Blended
Learning in UK and Malaysia
1. Statement of advanced studies undertaken in connection with the
programme of research (regulation 4.1 refers)
2. Concurrent registration for two or more academic awards (regulation 4.8
refers)
* I declare that while registered as a candidate for the University of Glamorgan’s
research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for
another award of the University or other academic or professional institution.
3. Material submitted for another award
* I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any
other submission for any academic award.
Signature of candidate: ..................................... Date: ..17 July 2009..................
iii
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.