314x Filetype PDF File size 0.23 MB Source: s3.amazonaws.com
BRIEF REPORT
TRIANGLES: THE “GLUE” OF BOWEN FAMILY
SYSTEMS THEORY
Patricia A. Comella, JD
Bowen family systems theory is a descriptive theory about emotional
process in the human species. The theory describes several interlock-
ing concepts. This paper presents a brief discussion of the concept
of the “triangle,” which was critical to integration of the theory.
Until Bowen “saw” the centrality of triangles to emotional process,
integration of the theory eluded him. Once Bowen saw triangles, he
“became a different person.” The paper also offers several compara-
tive examples from the realm of human and nonhuman behavior to
illustrate the concept of the triangle.
IntroductIon
urray Bowen (1913-1990) devoted over forty years to
Mobserving emotional process in the human species, developing
concepts to describe that process, integrating the concepts stem-
ming from those observations into a coherent theory, and testing the
theory that bears his name with hundreds of human families. Bowen
family systems theory examines the human as an emotional species
whose members have instincts for self-preservation and reproduc-
tion, interest in their own well-being, a capacity for living together
in complex relationship systems, a capacity for distinguishing fact
from imagination, and a capacity for choice. Many of the patterns
of behavior observed in humans in their relationship systems also
seem to be present in other animal societies.
In its present form Bowen theory is the integration of the con-
cepts of differentiation of self, triangles, nuclear family emotional
system, family projection process, multigenerational transmission
process, sibling position, emotional cutoff, and societal regression
into a coherent theory about human emotional functioning (Bowen
1978, Kerr and Bowen 1988). Integration of the concepts into a co-
herent theory did not occur overnight. It was not until August 1966,
about two decades into his quest for a science of human behavior, that
Bowen discovered the “glue” that cemented the concepts together
Ms. comella is on the faculty of the Georgetown Family center.
© Georgetown Family center, 2001
67
68 Family SyStemS 2001
into an integrated theory about emotional process in the human
species. that glue was the concept of triangles.
once Bowen “saw” triangles, he “became a different person,”(Kerr
and Bowen, 379) and ”finally knew one way through the impenetrable
thicket which is the family emotional process.” (380, italics in original).
Defining his family in terms of triangles and interlocking triangles
and making contact with “every important triangle in the family,”
he brought representatives from all of those triangles together “in
one living room” in 1967. “By the time this new meeting was thirty
minutes old,” Bowen knew he had the key to understanding family
emotional process (379).
WhAt Is A trIAnGle?
A triangle may be defined as the smallest emotional unit in
which the stresses of living together can be managed at a given level
of intensity, which varies from individual to individual and also with
time and circumstances. A triangle is a three-individual system. the
fundamental triangle in human social systems is a child and its two
parents or primary caretakers. In this triangle, the child learns basic
patterns of adapting to life’s challenges and assumes a functioning
position in relation to the parents. the emotional maturity of the
parents in managing the intensity of the emotional process in the
marital relationship will strongly influence the degree to which the
child will be able to function as a separate self, rather than as an
appendage of the parents and stabilizer of the marital relationship.
In the triangle with the child, the parents, within limits, are able to
manage the stresses of the marital relationship.
After years of research, Bowen came to regard the triangle as a
fact of life. until he “saw” the relationship of mother, father and child,
he was not able to explain fully enough the individual behavior and
functioning he was observing. Before seeing the relationship among
mother, father and child, he was not able to understand the intensity
and persistence of the attachment between mother and child. seeing
the relationship among the three explained the functioning positions
of each in maintaining the stability and persistence of the relationship
system and the difficulty in achieving fundamental shifts toward
greater flexibility in making the choices to meet life’s challenges.
seeing the triangle as part of a multigenerational process helped to
explain the intensity of emotional process being observed.
Through his work at the Menninger Clinic and at the National
Institute of Mental health, Bowen ultimately came to understand
Vol. 6, No. 1 BrieF report 69
triangles and interlocking triangles as basic building blocks of the
social systems to which humans belong. these systems include the
family and the workplace, as well as the larger society (Bowen 1978).
Triangles and interlocking triangles reflect the proposition that to
understand individual behavior and functioning it is necessary to
understand the context—the relationship system—in which the basic
patterns of functioning are laid down.
What makes triangles so central to social systems? Social
systems are purposeful systems. they contribute to the well-be-
ing and sometimes survival of the members. Members coordinate
and cooperate in making the system work and endure. They have
functioning positions within the system and enter into reciprocal
relationships with one another, in which the functioning of one can
only be understood in the context of the relationship with the other.
However, living and working together involve stress, even under
the best of circumstances. no individual can have his own way all of
the time. Maintaining the well-being of the system requires give and
take. Under conditions of relative scarcity members must cooperate
and coordinate with competitors for access to resources—and almost
anything can be a resource! simply put, triangles help individuals
to manage the stresses of living together (comella 1997).
Membership in a social system carries with it inescapable
costs in the form of membership-induced stress, which engenders
automatic responses to threat. the stress may vary from member to
member and may change with time, but it is endemic to the system.
When a living organism forms an appraisal of threat, it responds
automatically (ledoux 1996). Bowen called response to threat “anxi-
ety.” Anxiety is unavoidable and is a cost of membership. the stress
is highest in two-individual relationships where the relationships
have special importance to survival or well- being. A way of manag-
ing the intensity of the emotional process and the level of stress is
by converting the two-individual relationship to a three-individual
relationship. doing so lowers the intensity of the emotional process
between the two by diffusing it into the larger three-person system.
It makes the relationship more manageable, more bearable, and more
durable. Presumably, the triangle preserves the benefits in sufficient
measure while ameliorating the relationship-induced costs. In this
manner, triangles contribute to the survival of the social system and
the well-being of its members.
consider life within reproductive units (harems) of the gelada
baboon, where comfortable twosomes may ameliorate conditions
within the social groups. (dunbar 1984.) harems are headed by an
70 Family SyStemS 2001
adult male (the harem-master) and may include one or two younger
male followers not yet physically mature enough to secure mastership
for themselves, or older male followers who have lost mastership.
despite their premier status as sires of offspring during their tenure,
harem-masters do not “call the shots” when it comes to social struc-
ture or harem size: the females do. the female dominance hierarchy
affects female access to the harem-master and fertility. Females gain
advantage through partnerships, particularly enduring ones between
mothers and elder daughters, and thereby accomplish together what
they could not accomplish alone in the female dominance hierarchy.
Although described as coalitions, the partnerships have meaning
only when viewed in the context of the advantages the partners gain
through their association vis a vis other members of the reproductive
unit.
de Waal (1989a) describes life in a captive colony of chimpan-
zees, a naturally “closed” social system because emigration is not an
option available to the captives to manage their relationships with
each other. two young chimpanzees, members of the colony, were
playing together. As so often happens among playmates, they got
into a squabble. the mothers of the two were watching and becoming
increasingly uncomfortable. one mother summoned a third female,
Mama, who had a history of peaceful interventions. The peacemaker
separated the two young chimpanzees. neither was hurt and the
relationship between the mothers remained undisturbed.
the therapeutic relationship is yet another example of a tri-
angle. Freud postulated that in the relationship with the therapist,
an individual would automatically replicate a significant early
relationship (the transference). the therapist had the potential to
act out significant past relationships in a countertransference. In
other words, the seemingly dyadic relationship between therapist
and patient could not be fully understood without reference to the
relationships “transferred” or “counter-transferred” into the thera-
pist-patient relationship. underlying the therapeutic application of
Bowen theory is the premise that if one member of a family system
enters into relationship with a neutral therapist (vis a vis the family
issues), who avoids a countertransference, the individual can relate
to members of the family differently. thus, the individual’s relation-
ships with family members can be conceptualized as triangles that
include the neutral therapist.
Here are a few other examples of triangles and interlocking
triangles and questions they prompt that illustrate the underlying
utility of the triangle in managing relationships. does the introduction
of a third make a relationship between two more manageable?
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.