162x Filetype PDF File size 0.29 MB Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Opinion: EANDCB validation O rigin: d omestic - RPC reference number: RPC 4261/4262/4263/4264/4265/4267/4268/4269/4270 - FCA Date of implementation: see table MiFID II: inducements; research and inducement; taping; best-execution; client categorisation; independence; disclosure; OPS; investment research Financial Conduct Authority RPC rating: validated This opinion covers nine measures; for each, a brief description of the change, its impacts and the quality of the submission is given in the table below. The combined equivalent annual net direct cost to business (EANDCB) is underneath. General Comments For the proposed measures outlined below, the FCA has supported its analysis of the impacts on business with data from industry, business surveys, and consultations. The RPC is pleased to see the comprehensive approach taken by the FCA, drawing on several different sources, including consultation with industry. The analysis is concise, but some areas require an understanding of both the industry and existing regulatory landscape. The assessments could have been improved had the FCA presented its assessment in terms that are likely to be understood by the general reader. Measure Description Impact Quality of submission RPC-4261-FCA- MiFID II prohibits firms which provide The regulator explains that firms The regulator has Extension of investment advice on an independent affected are those providing financial provided a sufficient certain MiFID II basis from accepting or retaining any advice or portfolio management level of evidence for the inducement fees, monetary or otherwise, in relation services to retail clients on MiFID RPC to believe that the Date of issue: 26/06/18 www.gov.uk/rpc 1 Opinion: EANDCB validation O rigin: d omestic - RPC reference number: RPC 4261/4262/4263/4264/4265/4267/4268/4269/4270 - FCA Date of implementation: see table provisions to to the services they provide to clients. instruments; the FCA estimate that quality of analysis for firms providing The changes presented here extend there are 16,854 such firms. It this measure is fit for investment this prohibition to firms which provide estimates total one-off familiarisation purpose. The advice and investment advice on a restricted basis costs of £4.7 million. The regulator assessment uses a portfolio i.e. advice restricted to certain products also estimates limited ongoing reasonable and management to and/or providers. implementation costs, on the grounds proportionate approach retail clients that the new rules mirror existing to analyse potential Retail Distribution Review (RDR) costs to business. Implementation rules and therefore will require no date: 3rd material change to firms’ systems. January 2018 RPC-4262-FCA- Under MiFID II, the ban on accepting or The FCA estimates that 311 firms will During the consultation, Extension of the retaining any fees relating to the incur direct material costs from this the regulator noted that MiFID II provision of services to clients, does discretionary policy decision, as it has some survey research and not apply to research. Firms providing decided to exempt collective portfolio respondents were inducements individual portfolio management are managers from the provision. The unsure of the precise provisions to allowed to receive research without FCA states that the cost of external legal interpretation of collective breaching the inducement rules, as research purchased by the firm some of the portfolio long as the research is paid for directly should not be included as firms were requirements and that managers already paying for research. The there is, therefore, some from the firm’s resources or through a measures just changed the payment uncertainty survey Implementation Research Payment Account (RPA). A method. It should be noted, however, responses. It argues date: 3rd RPA is funded by separate charge to that any additional cost of paying for that the benefits of the January 2018 the client and must be agreed and external research caused by the measure to consumers disclosed. The changes presented here changes has been included in the will outweigh the costs Date of issue: 26/06/18 www.gov.uk/rpc 2 Opinion: EANDCB validation O rigin: d omestic - RPC reference number: RPC 4261/4262/4263/4264/4265/4267/4268/4269/4270 - FCA Date of implementation: see table extend the requirements to collective analysis. The regulator estimates, but does not present portfolio managers (CPMs). based on survey results, that 33%- benefit estimates to 76% of affected firms do not delegate support this assertion. investment management and will The RPC confirms that therefore incur costs as a result of the approach adopted these changes. The FCA estimates, by the FCA is based on the same surveys, that total reasonable and one-off costs are between £3.8 -£8.4 proportionate but million and ongoing costs between £2 agrees that the -£4.5 million. assessment could have been improved had the survey questions been clearer. The RPC also notes that the assessment could have been improved by presenting appropriate benefit estimates. RPC-4263-FCA- Existing FCA rules require certain firms The FCA estimates a total of 1,184 The RPC believes that Extending to record telephone and electronic firms will be impacted by the the approach taken by MiFID II communications which relate to an proposed changes. The regulator the FCA is reasonable requirements for agreement between the firm and the explains that some firms will be less and proportionate. firms to record client. MiFID II introduced a similar affected than others due to existing telephone obligation on an EU level and required taping requirements and will therefore conversations or records to be kept for 5 years. The only incur familiarisation and gap Date of issue: 26/06/18 www.gov.uk/rpc 3 Opinion: EANDCB validation O rigin: d omestic - RPC reference number: RPC 4261/4262/4263/4264/4265/4267/4268/4269/4270 - FCA Date of implementation: see table electronic changes presented here extend analysis costs. It estimates these to communications existing regulations to cover be one-off costs of £0.2 million. DIMs discretionary investment managers who do not already tape, will incur Implementation (DIMs), energy market participants one-off costs of installing the date: 3rd (EMPs), oil market participants (OMPs), infrastructure and ongoing costs of January 2018 and UK branches of third country firms. taping, storage, and conversation retrieval. The FCA estimates costs based on analysis from a previous CBA which multiplies the increase in yearly cost of storage per user by the number of users and estimates ongoing costs of £0.6 million from year 5 onwards. On this basis, the regulator estimates one-off costs of between £2.5-£5 million and ongoing costs of between £2.4-£4.7 million. RPC-4264-FCA- MiFID II obligates firms to put in place The FCA explains that businesses The regulator has Extending the arrangements and monitoring to make covered by the proposal include provided a proportionate MiFID II best sure they are achieving best execution 2,439 financial advice firms and 81 level of evidence to execution on behalf of their clients. More UCITS management companies. For support its assessment requirements to specifically, MiFID II requires financial advice firms to read and of the measure. The Article 3 retail investment firms that execute, transmit digest the changes and conduct gap FCA states that benefits financial or place orders to: analysis to check their current to consumers are likely advisers and practices against the new to exceed costs but UCITS expectations, the regulator estimates does not include them Date of issue: 26/06/18 www.gov.uk/rpc 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.