jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Grafting Pdf 90262 | Immunology00429 0062


 163x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.70 MB       Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov


File: Grafting Pdf 90262 | Immunology00429 0062
359 immunology 1965 9 complement in skin grafting in mice linda d caren and l t rosenberg department ofmedical microbiology stanford university stanford california received 25th january 1965 summary the ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 16 Sep 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
             359.
    Immunology, 1965, 9,
              Complement in Skin Grafting in Mice
                   LINDA D. CAREN AND L. T. ROSENBERG
               Department ofMedical Microbiology, Stanford University,
                          Stanford, California
                       (Received 25th January 1965)
      Summary. The role of haemolytic complement activity in the rejection of skin
      homografts in mice was studied. Two co-isogenic lines of mice were used, which
      are only known to differ in one respect. One line (BIO.D2 new) possesses haemolytic
      complement activity, while the other line (BIO.D2 old) lacks such activity. Both
      lines of mice rejected CF-l and C57B1/6J skin grafts at essentially the same rate.
      It was therefore concluded that the presence or absence ofhaemolytic complement
      activity does not affect the rejection of skin homografts in mice. To determine if
      BIO.D2 new and BlO.D2 old line are histocompatible, skin grafts were exchanged
      between members ofboth lines. Although BIO.D2 new line mice accepted BlO.D2
      old line skin grafts without exception, the reverse situation did not always obtain.
      The possible role of Hc, as well as alternative reasons for the observed histo-
      incompatibility, are discussed.
                         INTRODUCTION
     The role of 'complement' in immunologic reactions is known with considerable
    uncertainty. Experiments designed to test the importance of complement are beset with
    the hazards attendant upon study ofcomplex reactions ofill-defined largely uncharacter-
    ized proteins in biologic systems. The existence of lines of mice that differ with respect
    to haemolytic complement activity has recently been reported (Rosenberg and Tachibana,
    1962). Ofparticular interest are the strains C57Bl/10-H-2d (Hc'/Hc') (BIO.D2 new line)
    which possess haemolytic complement activity, and C57BI/10-H-2d (Hc0/Hc') (BIO.D2
    old line) mice which lack such activity, (Herzenberg, Tachibana, Herzenberg and
    Rosenberg, 1963). It has been shown that this difference is due to two alleles, Hc' and
    Hco, acting at a single locus (Herzenberg et al., 1963; Tachibana, Ulrich and Rosenberg,
    1963). The dominant allele is Hc', which, when present, results in the synthesis of a
    P-migrating serum protein. This serum protein, designated hc', functions as a component
    of complement, while Hc' produces no detectable product (Tachibana and Rosenberg,
    1964). This serum protein system has recently been reported under another name
    (Cinader and Dubiski, 1963, 1964).
     In the present study the rates of rejection of foreign skin grafts placed on members of
   each line are compared. Also reported are experiments to determine if BlO.D2 new and
   BlO.D2 old line are histocompatible, i.e. if the gene Hc' could function as a histocom-
   patibility gene, or ifthe two strains differed from each other at any loci other than the Hc
   locus.
                              359
                   360                                   D. Caren and L. T. Rosenberg
                                                  Linda
                                                  MATERIALS AND METHODS
                      Animals used. The following inbred and random bred strains ofmice were obtained from
                   stocks maintained in this department: two sub-lines of C57Bl/l0-H-2d (BlO.D2),
                   BlO.D2/Sn new line (G12F3G6F2G4F12) and B10.D2/Sn old line (G12F33); C57B1/6J;
                   and CF-1 (non-inbred). All donors and recipients were matched as to sex.
                      Grafting procedure.  Sterile 4 per cent chloral hydrate (0-1 ml/g body weight), injected
                   i.p., was used as anaesthetic whenever necessary. Since each donor contributed many
                   grafts, the skin was removed from the trunk of the body in one entire piece. Thereafter
                   the grafting techniques were essentially as described by Billingham et al., (Billingham,
                   1954; Billingham and Medawar, 1951; Billingham and Silvers, 1961). When four grafts
                   were placed on a recipient, two fitted grafts in one bed were placed on each side. The
                   grafts were covered with a sterile gauze patch, a 35 x 75 mm strip of cohesive latex
                   bandage (Bryant and Bernard, 1955) (The Sealtex Company, Chicago, Illinois), and two
                   strips ofsimilar size surgical adhesive tape. The cephalic halfofthe bandage was covered
                   with the same size strip ofplaster ofParis impregnated gauze.              set reactions were pre-
                      Spleen cell suspensions to be used in attempts to elicit second                   i.p. (1/2 spleen
                   paredinHanks'sBalanced Salt Solutionimmediately prior to beinginjected                     new line
                   equivalent/injection). The serum isoantigen, hc', which distinguishes Bi0.D2
                   from B1O.D2 old line, was prepared as described previously (Tachibana and Rosenberg,
                   1964). Animals were shown to be effectively immunized against the isoantigen by the
                   demonstration of precipitating serum antibody to hc' by double diffusion in agar
                   (Tachibana and Rosenberg, 1964).                        and examinedonthetenthpost-operative
                      Evaluation ofgrafts. The grafts were unwrapped                described by Billingham (1954).
                   day, and evaluated visually according to the standards
                   The grafts were checked daily until they were 1 month old, then at weekly intervals.
                                                               RESULTS
                                                              EXPERIMENT I
                      Four skin grafts (CF-1, C57B1/6J, B1O.D2 new, BlO.D2 old) were placed on each
                   BlO.D2 new and BlO.D2 old line recipient. In order to control position effects, all com-
                   binations ofpositions and contiguity were equally represented. The median survival time
                    (MST), the day by which 50 per cent of the grafts were rejected, was determined when
                   applicable (Billingham, Brent, Medawar and Sparrow, 1954). In addition, thirty-seven
                   mice were subjected to autografts. There were no graft failures among all thirty-seven
                   mice, thirty-three ofwhich lived at least 17 weeks.         in the first three columns ofTable 1.
                      The fate ofthe transplanted CF-1 grafts is shown of B10.D2 new and BlO.D2 old line
                    The second and third columns show the proportionthe                                   shown in the
                   recipients which rejected their CF-1 skin grafts on              post-operative day      ofeach line
                    first column. The MST values of CF-1 skin grafts transplanted to recipients
                    are identical, 11 days in each case. All twenty-one B10.D2 old line recipients and all
                    thirty-seven BlO.D2 new line recipients rejected their CF-1 skin grafts by the twenty-third
                    post-operative day.                  grafts transplanted to BlO.D2 new and B1O.D2 old line
                      The fate of the C57B1/6J skin the fourth and fifth columns of Table 1. The MST
                    recipients is similarly shown in                     B1O.D2 new and B1O.D2 old mice do not
                    values of C57B1/6J skin grafts transplanted to
                                                                   in Mice                                         361
                                                  Skin Grafting
                                                           TABLE 1
                       THE REJECTION OF CF-1 AND C57B1/6J SKIN GRAFTS BY BMW.D2 NEW AND B10.D2
                                                     OLD LINE RECIPIENTS
                            Post-          CF-I grafts placed on         C57B1/6J grafts placed on
                          operative       BMM.D2          BlM.D2          B10.D2          BMM.D2
                             day          new line        old line       new line         old line
                                         recipients      recipients      recipients      recipients
                              10          32/32           21/21           16/16           34/34
                              11            2/32           5/21           10/16           11/34
                              12            0/32           5/21            7/16            8/34
                              13            0/32           3/21            5/16            6/34
                              14            0/32           0/21            4/16            5/34
                            15-23           0/32           0/21            0/16            0/34
                              Fractions indicate proportion ofgrafts surviving to day indicated.
       differ significantly, being 12 and 11 days respectively. All thirty-four B1O.D2 old line
       recipients and all sixteen B1O.D2 new line recipients rejected their C57B1/6J grafts by the
       twentieth post-operative day.                     line mice               their          and                skin
          Since BlO.D2 old and BlO.D2 new                             rejected          CF-1          C57B1/6J
       grafts at essentially the same rate, it was concluded that the presence or absence ofhaemo-
       lytic complement activity does not detectably affect the rejection of homologous skin
       grafts in mice.
                                                       EXPERIMENT II
          The purpose of the second experiment was to determine if BlO.D2 new and BlO.D2
       old line mice were histocompatible. Table 2 summarizes the behaviour of BlO.D2 new
        and BlO.D2 old line skin grafts when transplanted to BlO.D2 new and BlO.D2 old line
       recipients. The BlO.D2 new line mice freely accepted all the BlO.D2 new and BlO.D2
       oldline skin grafts applied. Although the BIO.D2 old line recipients accepted all the BIO.D2
       old line skin grafts, three BlO.D2 new line skin grafts were rejected during the seventeenth
       post-operative week. There were, however, other BlO.D2 new line skin grafts which were
       not rejected by BlO.D2 old line recipients, including several which have persisted on
       surviving mice for up to 6 months. Since there were no rejections seen when BlO.D2 old
       line skin grafts were placed on BlO.D2 new line recipients, it seemed possible that the Hc'
       gene might be functioning as a histocompatibility gene. Therefore, three additional
                                                           TABLE 2
                              HOMOGRAFTS AND ISOGRAFTS IN B1O.D2 NEW AND B1O.D2 OLD LINE
                                                           RECIPIENTS
                                     Type of             Type ofskin            Fraction of
                                     recipient           graft applied        successful grafts
                                   BMM.D2 new           B10.D2 new                  11/11
                                   B10.D2 new           B1O.D2 old                  13/13
                                   B10.D2 old           B10.D2 old                  11/11
                                   B10.D2 old           B10.D2 new                   7/10*
                                 * The three rejections observed in this group occurred in the fourth
                              month after grafting.
                                                                 D. Caren and L. T. Rosenberg
                     362                                 Linda
                     experiments were designed to clarify the importance of the Hc' gene in the three rejec-
                     tions of BlO.D2 new line grafts by BIO.D2 old line recipients. The purpose of all three
                     experiments was to determine if second set (accelerated) rejections of BIO.D2 new line
                     grafts by BIO.D2 old line recipients could be elicited. BlO.D2 new line skin graft to each
                        The first experiment consisted of applying another                                             new line skin
                     ofthe three BIO.D2 old line recipients which had rejected their first BIO.D2                            weakens
                     grafts. It has been shown that active immunity elicited by a single skin homograft
                     perceptibly but is still strong 4 months after grafting (Medawar, Billingham and Sparrow,
                      1953). The second grafts have not been rejected during the period of observation. This is
                     shown in Table 3.
                                                                           TABLE 3
                                     FAILURE TO DEMONSTRATE ACCELERATED REJECTION OF BlO.D2 NEW LINE SKIN GRAFTS
                                                               BY BlO.D2 OLD LINE RECIPIENTS
                                          Method of presensitization       No. of       No. of mice        Duration of
                                         ofBlO.D2 old line recipients    recipients    which rejected    surviving grafts
                                                                                         their grafts        (weeks)
                                         Rejection ofprevious BlO.D2          3               0                 >5
                                            new line skin graft
                                         Injection of BlO.D2 new line         8               0                >13
                                            spleen cell suspension i.p.,
                                            1-3 weeks prior to
                                            grafting*
                                         Immunization with BlO.D2             4               0                >11
                                            new line serumt
                                        *Used 1/2 spleen equivalent per recipient. See Materials and Methods.        See
                                        tRecipients were shown to be producing anti-hc' antibody at time ofgrafting.
                                     Materials and Methods.
                         In the second experiment, eight BIO.D2 old line mice, which had been injected with
                      BlO.D2 new line spleen cells 1-3 weeks previously, were grafted with BlO.D2 new line
                      skin grafts. Spleen cells have been shown to function as effective immunizers when the H-2
                      locus or H-Y locus is involved, but less effectively when the H-3 locus is involved (Berrian
                      and McKhann, 1960; Sachs and Heller, 1958). As is shown in Table 3, all eight B1O.D2
                      old line mice have retained their grafts. No rejections have occurred during the 13 weeks of
                      observation.                        four B1O.D2 old line mice immunized with BlO.D2 new line
                         In the third experiment,                             of             new line skin                They were
                      serum euglobulin were used as recipients                     B10.D2                        grafts.
                      given a booster shot 5-7 days prior to grafting, and were shown to be producing pre-
                      cipitating anti-hc' antibody on the day grafted. As is shown in Table 3, there have been
                      no rejections during the period ofobservation.
                                                                     DISCUSSION
                         The first question which these experiments were designed to answer was: does the
                      presence or absence of haemolytic complement activity play a role in the rejection of
                      homologous skin grafts? Since B1O.D2 new and B1O.D2 old line mice rejected CF-1 and
                      C57B1/6J skin grafts with essentially equal alacrity, it may be concluded that haemolytic
                      complement activity is not necessary for skin graft rejection in mice.
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Immunology complement in skin grafting mice linda d caren and l t rosenberg department ofmedical microbiology stanford university california received th january summary the role of haemolytic activity rejection homografts was studied two co isogenic lines were used which are only known to differ one respect line bio new possesses while other old lacks such both rejected cf cb j grafts at essentially same rate it therefore concluded that presence or absence ofhaemolytic does not affect determine if blo histocompatible exchanged between members ofboth although accepted without exception reverse situation did always obtain possible hc as well alternative reasons for observed histo incompatibility discussed introduction immunologic reactions is with considerable uncertainty experiments designed test importance beset hazards attendant upon study ofcomplex ofill defined largely uncharacter ized proteins biologic systems existence has recently been reported tachibana ofparticular interest str...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.