249x Filetype PDF File size 0.29 MB Source: egyankosh.ac.in
UNIT 1 OBSERVATION METHOD Structure 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Objectives 1.2 Definition and Meaning of Observation 1.2.1 The Diverse Situation in which Observation can be Used 1.2.2 Planning the Observation 1.2.3 Problems of Observation 1.2.4 Ethical Issues in Observation 1.3 Characteristics of Observation 1.3.1 Units of Observation 1.3.2 Degree of Inference 1.3.3 Generalisation or Applicability 1.3.4 Gaining Access and Leaving the Field 1.3.5 Length of Time in the Field 1.4 Sampling 1.5 Data Collection Techniques 1.6 Types of Observation 1.6.1 Casual vs. Formal Observation 1.6.2 Direct vs. Indirect Observation 1.6.3 Unstructured Observation 1.6.4 Participant Observation 1.6.5 Specimen Records 1.6.6 Anecdotes 1.6.7 Structured Observation 1.6.8 Checklists 1.6.9 Rating Scales 1.6.10 Shortcoming of Rating Scales 1.7 Advantages and Disadvantages of Observation 1.8 Guides for Observation Method 1.9 Let Us Sum Up 1.10 Unit End Questions 1.11 Suggested Readings 1.0 INTRODUCTION Observation of the behaviour of individuals, groups and organisations or their products/ outcomes is not only an essential aspect of human life; it also forms á basic method of scientific research in behavioural sciences. Specifically, it is useful in such fields as Developmental Psychology, Anthropology, Behaviour Modification, Social Psychology and Evaluation Research. Observation can be used both in the laboratory as well as in naturalistic settings. Although behavioural scientists have largely used this method in the naturalistic settings it also forms a significant component of experimental (both field and laboratory) procedure. Indeed, in laboratory settings, careful Observation of subjects may not 5 Tools of Data Collection only shed light on the limitations of the experimental procedures but also generate ideas for future research. Observation involves looking and listening very carefully. We all watch other people sometimes, but we do not usually watch them in order to discover particular information about their behaviour. This is what Observation in Social Science involves. Observation is a complex research method because it often requires the researcher to play a number of roles and to use a number of techniques; including her/his five senses in order to collect data. In this unit we will be defining observation, understand how it is used as a method of research, we will also learn about the types of observation and the manner in which it is used as a tool of research. The procedure using observation as a tool for collecting data is also presented in this unit. 1.1 OBJECTIVES After completing this unit, you will be able to: define the method of observation as a research tool; describe observation; explain the meaning of observation; elucidate the types of observation; analyse the data obtained from observation; and list out the advantages and disadvantages of observation method. 1.2 DEFINITION AND MEANING OF OBSERVATION Observation has been defined as “the selection, provocation, recording and encoding that set of behaviours and setting/s concerning an organism ‘in situ’ which is consistent with empirical aims”. Literally, Observation is a process of ‘seeing’ the things or events with naked eye with or without the use of any device to unravel the complexity of any phenomena to satisfy the demands of an empirical question. Observation is way of gathering data by watching behaviour, events, or noting physical characteristics in their natural settings. Observations can be overt (everyone knows they are being observed) or covert (no one knows they are being observed and the observer is concealed). The benefit of covert Observation is that people are more likely to behave naturally if they do not know they are being observed. However, you will typically need to conduct overt Observations because of ethical problems related to concealing your Observation. Observation can also be either direct or indirect. Direct Observation is when you watch interactions, processes, or behaviours as they occur. For example, observing a teacher teaching a lesson from a Psychology curriculum to determine whether they are delivering it with fidelity. Indirect Observation is when you watch the results of interactions, processes, or behaviours. For example, observing the amount of plate waste left by students in a school cafeteria to determine whether a new food is acceptable to them. 6 1.2.1 The Diverse Situations in which Observation can be Observation Method Used The various situations in which observation as a method can be used are given below: 1) When you are trying to understand an ongoing process or situation. Through Observation, you can monitor or watch a process or situation that you are evaluating as it occurs. 2) When you are gathering data on individual behaviours or interactions between people. 3) Observation allows you to watch peoples’ behaviours and interactions directly, or watch for the results of behaviours or interactions. 4) When you need to know about a physical setting, that is a setting or environment where something takes place can help increase understanding of the event, activity, or situation you are evaluating. For example, you can observe whether a classroom or training facility is conductive to learning. 5) When data collection from individuals is not a realistic option. If respondents are unwilling or unable to provide data provide data through questionnaires or interviews, Observation is a method that requires little from the individuals from whom you need data. 1.2.2 Planning the Observation In planning observation of an event etc., the following points will have to be kept in mind. 1) Determine the focus: Think about the evaluation questions you want to answer through Observation and select a few areas of focus for your data collection. For example, you may want to know how well the Psychology curriculum is being implemented in the classroom. Your focus areas might be interactions between students and teachers’, and teachers’ knowledge, skills, and behaviours. 2) Design a system for data collection: Once you have focused your evaluation, think about the specific item for which you want to collect data and then determine how you will collect the information you need. There are three primary ways of collecting Observation data. These three methods can be combined to meet your data collection needs. 3) Recording sheets and checklists are the most standardised way of collecting Observation data and include both preset questions and responses. These forms are typically used for collecting data that can be easily described in advance (e.g., topics that might be covered in a Psychotherapy lesson). 4) Observation guides list the interactions, processes, or behaviours to be observed with space to record open-ended narrative data. 5) Field notes are the least standardised way of collecting Observation data and do not include preset questions or responses. Field notes are open-ended narrative data that can be written or dictated onto a tape recorder. 6) Select the sites: Select an adequate number of sites to help ensure that they are representative of the larger population and will provide an understanding of the situation you are observing. 7 Tools of Data Collection 7) Select the observers: You may choose to be the only observer or you may want to include others in conducting Observations. Stakeholders, other professional staff members, interns and graduate students, and volunteers, are potential observers. 8) Train the observers: It is critical that the observers are well-trained in your data collection process to ensure high quality and consistent data. The level of training will vary based on the complexity of the data collection and the individual capabilities of the observers. 9) Time your Observations appropriately: Programs and processes typically follow a sequence of events. It is critical that you schedule your Observations so that you are observing the components of the activity that will answer your evaluation questions. This requires advance planning. 1.2.3 Problems of Observation 1) Selection of phenomenon for observation The problem of selecting a phenomenon for Observation becomes very real, especially when knowledge of the detailed movements of the observed is essential for an understanding of the behaviour under study. The researcher is not merely confronted with the problem of selecting the items of greatest importance from the mass of data or quantities of discrete phenomena. He/she has to be equally concerned with organising discrete entities in terms of the divergent concepts and orientations of the observers. Indeed, it is the observers who are expected to categorise them on the basis of varied concepts and their frames of reference thus providing an organisation to the incoherent jumble of the “real world”. If the phenomena are not organised, the results are useless for understanding what has really occurred. Hence, it would be a difficult task for the researcher to evolve a theory which can effectively explain and predict behaviour. Indeed, the problem of selecting phenomena for Observation is intricately related to the problem of conceptualisation. As the observers are bombarded by a vast quantity and ‘wide array of stimuli, they are confronted with the baffling problem of choosing among them the phenomenon of greatest importance. This problem can be resolved, if the researcher himself/herself selects the phenomenon for Behavioural Observation prior to sending his observers to the fie1d. 2) Observer inference The observer himself/herself is both a crucial strength and a crucial weakness in Behavioural Observation. He/she has to process the information stemming from his/ her Observations and thereafter make inferences relating to complex constructs (e.g., aggression, hostility, leadership, conformity, etc.) He/she can meaningfully relate the observed behaviour to the variables under study. Of course, this requires that he/she possesses great powers of inference. The weakness of the observer is that he/she is likely to be influence by his/her own biases and, thus make incorrect inferences from his/her Observations. In conjunction with such personal biases, lack of knowledge of behaviour under study may also invalidate the Observation. Besides, the observer-inference difficulty, in several social situations, merely the presence of an observer may influence the object of Observation. Indeed, people tend to act differently and even artificially when observed. They put their best foot forward and thus, behave in an exemplary way rather than in a customary way. 8 People tend to adapt quickly to an observer’s presence and behave as they would
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.