jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Building Pdf 84740 | Right To Arbitration Under Hia Contracts


 181x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.08 MB       Source: www.vogtgraham.com.au


File: Building Pdf 84740 | Right To Arbitration Under Hia Contracts
western australia right to arbitration under hia contracts upheld by state administrative tribunal a recent decision of the state administrative tribunal has confirmed that it does not have jurisdiction to ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 13 Sep 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
             WESTERN AUSTRALIA                                                                                  
          
            Right to Arbitration under HIA Contracts upheld by State Administrative 
            Tribunal  
             
            A recent decision of the State Administrative Tribunal has confirmed that it does not have jurisdiction to deal 
            with building service and home building contract complaints in circumstances where the parties have already 
            activated the dispute resolution clause of their Housing Industry Association (HIA) standard form residential 
            building contract to refer their matters in dispute to arbitration.   
             
            In Shakur and Aintree Holdings Pty Ltd t/a Beaumonde Homes [2015] WASAT 12, a home owner entered 
            into a HIA lump sum building contract with the builder for the construction of a residential house.  The parties 
            fell into dispute on a number of contractual and workmanship matters during the course of the building 
            works, and the builder responded by issuing a formal notice of dispute under clause 16 of the contract to 
            refer the matters in dispute to resolution by an arbitrator appointed by HIA. 
             
            However, the home owner clients subsequently proceeded to lodge a building service complaint with the 
            Building Commissioner, which in turn was referred by the Building Commissioner to the State Administrative 
            Tribunal for determination.  The Tribunal concluded that the proceedings before it were an abuse of process, 
            as the builder had already referred the matters in dispute to arbitration and the home owner had participated 
            in the arbitration proceedings.  As Senior Member Raymond stated at paragraph 48, “It is inappropriate, and 
            an abuse of process, to litigate before two different bodies when the one body, in this case the arbitrator, has 
            jurisdiction to deal with all matters in controversy between the parties”.  
             
            This is an important decision which confirms that the arbitration clause of the HIA standard form residential 
            building contracts gives a party the right to insist on arbitration, rather than determination of the matters in 
            dispute by the Building Commissioner or the State Administrative Tribunal.  
             
            If you have any queries on this article or arbitration under HIA contracts then please contact Michael O’Kane, 
            HIA Workplace Advisor (WA) on 9492 9200 or m.okane@hia.com.au  
             
                                                                                                                
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Western australia right to arbitration under hia contracts upheld by state administrative tribunal a recent decision of the has confirmed that it does not have jurisdiction deal with building service and home contract complaints in circumstances where parties already activated dispute resolution clause their housing industry association standard form residential refer matters shakur aintree holdings pty ltd t beaumonde homes wasat owner entered into lump sum builder for construction house fell on number contractual workmanship during course works responded issuing formal notice an arbitrator appointed however clients subsequently proceeded lodge complaint commissioner which turn was referred determination concluded proceedings before were abuse process as had participated senior member raymond stated at paragraph is inappropriate litigate two different bodies when one body this case all controversy between important confirms gives party insist rather than or if you any queries article ...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.