333x Filetype PPTX File size 2.26 MB Source: www.irishellas.com
Maxeon Solar Cell Vs.
Conventional Solar Cell
Maxeon Solar Cell (Back) Conventional Solar Cells (Front)
Thick Thin lines of
copper-plated baked-on
foundation metal paste
Soldered copper
Strain-relieved ribbons
copper bar
connecting Ribbons
cell-to-cell connect
cell-to-cell
1. Thick copper (tin-plated) is robust against corrosion. 1. Very thin screen-printed metal lines on the front of the cell are
susceptible to corrosion over time
2. No soldering along the length of the cell
2. High-stress solder joints between the long copper ribbons and
3. Copper bar connecting cells has robust copper-to-copper the crystal solar cell
soldering, strain-relief, and double-redundancy.
• As the panels get hot in the day and cold at night the copper
4. Solid copper foundation maintains the cell energy production expands but the silicon cell does not.
even if the silicon cracks.
• Over time, this repeated stress causes cells to crack and
solder bonds to break.
3. Single points of failure on copper ribbons between cells.
4. Screen-printed metal paste has no strength to hold the cell
together when the silicon cracks
Cracked Standard Efficiency Cells in the Field
Conventional Panels SunPower Panel
r
e
w
o
P
o
N
=
s
a
e
r
a
k
c
a
l
B
Likely damaged in installation Likely damaged from Left side has broken copper Even with a crack, all parts of
or from repeated hot/cold poor soldering process and ribbons between a pair of cells. the cell are running (no black).
temp cycles hot/cold temp cycles.
Conventional panels commonly fail from hot/cold temperature
cycles that crack solar cells, solder joints and copper ribbons
over time.
Common Ways Conventional Solar Cells Degrade
Corrosion
Cell or Interconnect Breaks
Output Lead Problems
Junction Box Problems
Corrosion Jbox Delamination
Cell or 45.3% Overheated Wires, Diodes,
Interconnect Terminal Strips
Breaks Mechanical Damage
40.7% Defective Bypass Diodes
Wohlgemuth, J. “Reliability of PV Systems.”
Proceedings of SPIE, Aug, 2008.
Unmatched Reliability:
Cell or
Inter-
Unique MaxeonDesign connect
Breaks
• No cell-to-cell interconnect breakage
• Cell cracks have essentially no impact on energy output
105%
100% SunPower (Current)
n
o
i
t 95% Conventional Modules
a
d
a
r
g 90%
e
D
r
e 85%
w
o Certification
P Standard
80% 200 Cycles
75%
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Number of Cycles: -40 to 85C (-40 to 185F), 5 cycles per day
The unique design of the Maxeon cell makes the Non-SunPower data from Koehl, Michael, et. al.
“PV Reliability: Accelerated Aging Tests and
Panels impervious to hot/cold temperature cycles. Modeling of Degradation.” Fraunhofer ISE and
TUV Rheinland. Presented at EUPVSEC,
Valencia Spain, Sept 2010.
Unmatched Reliability:
Cell or
Inter-
Unique Maxeon Design connect
Breaks
• No conventional panel data is available for comparison for the
world’s most challenging accelerated test: cycles of hot-and-humid
followed by rapid freezing – that design cannot survive.
• The certification standard is a challenge for most panels at 10 cycles.1
SunPower panels are almost unaffected after 280 cycles.
100%
90% SunPower (Current)
SunPower (Previous)
80%
n 70%
o
i
t
a
d 60%
a
r For certification testing: “The top 4
g
e failure rates for c-Si modules were
D 50%
r
e related to damp heat, thermal cycling,
w 40%
o Certification humidity freeze and diode tests.”1
P
30% Standard
10 Cycles
20%
10%
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Number of Cycles: -40 to 85C (-40 to 185F) with ice and humidity, 1 cycle per day
The unique design of the Maxeon cell makes the
Panels impervious to water-freezing cycles.
1 TamizhMani, B. G. “Failure Analysis of Module Design
Qualification Testing – III,” 36th IEEE PVSC Conf, 2010.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.