156x Filetype PPT File size 0.47 MB Source: www.extension.iastate.edu
Objectives Objectives Identify potential benchmark measures of cost/benefit of quality management system adoption by agriculture. Set scope of the project Select summarizing fiscal indicator of costs and benefits measures Dual Roles for ISO 9000/9004 Dual Roles for ISO 9000/9004 QMS for fulfilling customer, regulatory, etc., requirements (ISO 9000) “Management should consider development of innovative financial methods to support and encourage improvement of the organizational performance” (ISO 9004 – Guidelines for performance improvements) Allocation of Costs: Process Approach Allocation of Costs: Process Approach Early methods of tracking quality costs was too limited “focus on cost of non- conformance i.e. external and internal failure costs”. (Juran) Process-cost broadens economics of quality by classifying cost of non- conformance and cost of conformance I.e. “costs incurred when a process is running without failure” (Schottmiller) Process Approach: Added Benefits Process Approach: Added Benefits Utilize cost of non-conformance (often called Cost of Poor Quality) and cost of conformance = greater cost saving opportunities may be available in reducing cost of conformance (Schottmiller) Process Costing Process Costing Allows the tracking and reduction of costs normally associated with efficiency in addition to effectiveness (quality)” (Schottmiller) Process simplification in addition to reduction of errors become objectives (Schottmiller) Relate the economics of quality to the amount of activity performed (ISO/TR 10014: Economics of Quality)
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.