306x Filetype PPTX File size 1.84 MB Source: www.erisee.org
2015 Research
• Teacher Survey
• Interviews with
Stakeholders
• Literature Review
Albania
Bosnia Herzegovina
Kosovo*
Macedonia (FYROM)
Montenegro
Serbia
Turkey
2
GOVERNANCE
It is essential that:
1. Effective and competent public authority that addresses strategy and drives
implementation of professional development
2. Governance is open to contribution of stakeholders and social partners
However, for VET in this region the research found:
• Consultation but not sustained, no multi-stakeholder platforms on CPD
• Moves towards decentralisation have not yet led to practical improvements in CPD
• Legal norms exist – but do not distinguish between VET and general teachers
QUALITY ASSURANCE OF PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
• National accreditation of CPD programmes exists in 6 countries but, according to some
users, is a costly barrier or delay for potential training providers and does not guarantee
high quality
• Little quality assurance of CPD at school level – teachers are ‘consumers’ not shapers of
CPD
• Qualifications function as initial requirement to become teacher – but not much used to
incentivise and quality assure CPD, e.g. modular post-graduate qualifications
WHO PROVIDES CPD FOR VET TEACHERS?
Commissioning model – encourages competition but does not adequately incentivise independent
providers
CPD dependent on donor-funded programmes – project driven and fragemented but may be
possible to shape into more coherent and sustainable provision
Universities and businesses make only modest contribution to CPD for VET teachers (outside of
Turkey)
Low level of specialist CPD provision for VET teachers
PARTICIPATION IN PROFESSIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.