127x Filetype PPTX File size 0.06 MB Source: mentor.ieee.org
Agenda a) Review progress on action items – define problem and lead off-line discussion for the six ‘areas of focus’ 1. Operational Efficiency – BenR, 2. Quality Standards -- GeoffT and ApurvaM, 3. External Influence – Open, 4. Strategic Planning – PaulN, 5. Technical Coherence – GlennP, 6. 802 Scope – RogerM (complete) b) Hybrid Meeting Evaluation ad hoc – status JonR c) Monthly meeting reminder: (1 min) default -- 13:00-14:00 ET 3rd Tuesday of each month in 2021 15Dec20, 19Jan, 16Feb, 16Mar, 20Apr, 18May, 15Jun, 20Jul, 17Aug, 21Sep, 19Oct, 16Nov, 21Dec d) Review action items, draft agenda for next meeting (~5 min) 2 Restructuring ad hoc membership • Ad Hoc Participation – All 802 EC Members, Nikolich to Chair – Plus one additional member per WG/TAG as designated by the WG/TAG chair • 802.3: Adam Healey, 802.11: Robert Stacey, 802.15: Rick Alfvin, 802.18: Stuart Kerry, 802.19: Tuncer Baykas, 802.24: Ben Rolfe • Meeting protocol – Default: open meeting, anyone may observe – Only ad hoc members may speak, unless the chair decides otherwise • Please use the chat function to request a spot on the queue to speak – We will use straw polls to develop consensus when necessary • simple majority of those voting Y or N – Anyone willing to help take notes? – PaulN, TBD 3 802 restructuring ad hoc -- background • Restructuring objective – increase efficiency and responsiveness of 802 LMSC – Consider more autonomy for WGs and TAGs, while maintaining 802 brand identity, high quality standards and cross group collaboration/coordination – Possibly re-charter the 802 Executive Committee • Focus on long term growth, fostering new work, high level interactions with external organizations and public visibility. • Next Steps – Ongoing discussions at 1 hour monthly meetings, report out status each plenary – Deliverable: a well vetted and socialized recommendation for EC consideration within 12 months. 4 Areas of focus “Problem Definition” status update reports 1. Operational Efficiency (Area for Improvement) BenR 1. Reducing the time to get PARs approved; timely approval by NesCom and SASB 2. Training new groups/individuals. Maybe it would make us a preferred organization in which to start new standards, beyond those areas where we are well established. 2. Quality Standards (Maintain Good Performance) GeoffT & ApurvaM 1. Maintain our high-quality PAR review process, if we make any changes to the process 2. Discuss the Technical Review ideas mentioned on the call, and maybe that is an area for improvement 3. External Influence (Maintain Good Performance) Open 1. A unified 802 submissions to Regulatory Bodies is good. We probably want to maintain that strong process. 4. Strategic Planning. PaulN 1. incubation of emerging areas, collaboration with internal and external Organizational Units to the IEEE, public visibility 5. Maintain and enhance technical coherence and coordination across groups. GlennP 6. Revise 802 Scope. RogerM (complete) 5 Draft revised 802 scope IEEE 802 develops and maintain standards specifying data link and physical layer protocols to support packet transmission and delivery among network-layer clients. Protocols are specified for various physical channels with sufficient detail to allow multivendor interoperability across the interfaces to the communication medium. Interoperability is also specified for transmission of network-layer packets via a set of data links. Supplementary specifications detail related functionality, including control, management, channel coexistence, and power distribution. Supporting outputs include future-looking documentation, standards body interactions, and regulatory contributions. Current IEEE Computer Society 802 LMSC scope: The scope of the Standards Committee is to develop and maintain networking standards, recommended practices and guides for local, metropolitan, and other area networks, using an open and accredited process, and to advocate them on a global basis. Its technical scope is intended to be flexible and is ultimately determined by the sum of its approved PARs. Compare to IEEE Communication Society/AccessCore Standards Committee scope: The scope of the Sponsor is to develop and maintain standards covering: access communications networks, core communications networks, other related areas 6
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.