180x Filetype PDF File size 0.45 MB Source: eprints.umm.ac.id
17 CHAPTER III RESERCH METHODOLOGY 3.1 Research Method This research use quasi experimental design. Quasi experimental research is a good design of the research because although it is not true experiments, it provides reasonable controlled over most sources of invalidity and it is usually stronger than the pre experimental design (McMillan and Schumacher, 2006). Quasi experimental is a design where the researcher is able to control the treatment but is not able to randomly assign the subject of the treatment (Ary, 2010). Quasi experimental design focuses on treatment and outcome, hence the data take from pre test and post test in order to know whether mind mapping can improve english writing skill of descriptive text. In this research design, there are two kinds of classes used. There are the experimental class were given treatment by using mind mapping and controlled class by without mind mapping (Ary, 2010). 3.2 Hypotheses This research has two hypotheses. The two hypotheses are null hypothesis (H0) and alternative hypothesis (H1) that described as follows: 1) The null hypothesis (H0) Mind mapping can not improve English writing skill of descriptive text at the eight grade of SMPN 6 Pasuruan. 2) The alternative hypothesis (H1) Mind mapping can improve English writing skill of descriptive text at the eight grade of SMPN 6 Pasuruan 1.3 Population And Sample Population in this research are second grade students of SMPN 6 Kota Pasuruan. Population is the group of interest to researcher, the group to whom the researcher would like to generalize the result of study (Sanjaya, 2013). The 17 18 population of this research is the second grade students of SMPN 6 Kota Pasuruan. There are eight classes there (VIII-A, VIII-B, VIII-C, VIII-D, VIII-E, VIII-F, VIII-G, VIII-H). The quantity of the students in second grade are 250 students. Sample is portion of population (Azwar, 2010). the sample of this research taken by two class from eight class that have the lower score of the middle test in eight grade. The lower score of the middle test got by VIII-G (53) and VIII-H (42). In addition, VIII-H become experimental class and VIII-G become control class and VIII-G has 30 students and than VIII-H has 30 students. A tecnique of sampling is purposive sampling. Purposive sampling is choosing the sampling based on the certain puposes to support the research (Sukardi, 2003). 3.4 Data Collection This research used student’s score of pre test and post test as the data. To collect the data, the research needed an instrument and needed to do several procedures. 3.5 Instruments And Data Gathering Technique Instruments is a tools that is use to collect and analyze the data objectively and systematic in order to solve a problem or testing a hypothesis (Sanjaya, 2013). In this study the researcher use pre test and post test instrument. The test related to descriptive text. Data gathering technique is a systematic procedures and standards to obtain the necessary data (Nasir, 2003). Data gathering technique in this study use student’s writing score of pre test and post test. The resercher need an instrument and need to do several procedures. 3.6 Data Analysis Technique The gathered data use to find out the differences of students’achievement in experimental class and controlled class. In line with this, the resercher uses independent sampel t-test. It is use to examine the significance difference of student’s writing skill of descriptive text achievement between experimental class 19 and controlled class. The researcher use SPSS 21 versions to ease calculation the data. The formula of t-test as follow (Sudijono, 2006): Notes: M1 = Mean of Variable X (experimental class) M2 = Mean of variable Y (controlled class) SEM1 = Standard Error Mean of Variable X (experimental class) SE = Standard Error Mean of variable Y (controlled class) M2 To prove hypothesis, the data obtained in experimental class and control class are calculated by using p-value. p-value is error value obtained from statistical calculations with assumption as follows (Riduwan et al., 2011): 1) If p-value > error of degree (α) 0.05 the null hypothesis (H0) is accepted and alternative hypothesis (H1) is rejected. It is proven that Mind mapping can not improve English writing skill of descriptive text at the eight grade of SMPN 6 Pasuruan. 2) If p-value < error of degree (α) 0.05 the null hypothesis (H0) is rejected and alternative hypothesis (H1) is accepted. It is proven that Mind mapping can improve English writing skill of descriptive text at the eight grade of SMPN 6 Pasuruan. 3.7 RESEARCH PROCEDURE The data for this study is obtain from the student scores of writing pre test and post test. To collect the data the procedure of research as follow: 1. Giving pre test Pre test is delivere at the first time before the researcher apply the treatment in experimental and control class. 2. Giving treatment After pre test, the researcher give treatment to experimental class. Experimental class were given treatment by using mind mapping and 20 controlled class by without mind mapping. The treatment for experimental class were given only two meeting. 3. Giving post test After the treatment, the researcher give a post test to experimental and control class. By giving the post test, the researcher know whether the implementation of mind mapping in writing descriptive text has a significant role in increas students writing english skill or not. After that, the pre-test and post test that produced will be scored by the researchers and classroom teachers. It’s done in order to the value is given can be valid.
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.