jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Discount Rate Wma Questionnaire Aggregate Responses Redacted


 172x       Filetype XLS       File size 1.94 MB       Source: consult.justice.gov.uk


File: Discount Rate Wma Questionnaire Aggregate Responses Redacted
sheet 1 portfolio summaries contents table 1 codings used to identify the firm the case study considered and the discount rate dr applied to the award in the case study ...

icon picture XLS Filetype Excel XLS | Posted on 16 Aug 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial file snippet.
Sheet 1: Portfolio Summaries
Contents
















































































Table 1. Codings used to identify the Firm, the case study considered and the discount rate (DR) applied to the award in the case study. See 'Data & Notes' for further details.











































Portfolio: port_1_1_A port_1_2_A port_1_3_A port_2_1_A port_2_2_A port_2_3_A port_3_1_A port_3_2_A port_3_3_A port_1_1_B port_1_2_B port_1_3_B port_2_1_B port_2_2_B port_2_3_B port_3_1_B port_3_2_B port_3_3_B port_1_1_C port_1_2_C port_1_3_C port_2_1_C port_2_2_C port_2_3_C port_3_1_C port_3_2_C port_3_3_C port_1_1_D port_1_2_D port_1_3_D port_2_1_D port_2_2_D port_2_3_D port_3_1_D port_3_2_D port_3_3_D




Firm: A A A A A A A A A B B B B B B B B B C C C C C C C C C D D D D D D D D D




Case: 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3




DR: 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3


















































































Table 2. Asset allocations for portfolios recommended by each firm for each case study under the three example discount rates. See Table 1 for corresponding firm, case study and discount rate.







































Asset Type Asset, Other Average Min Max Portfolio port_1_1_A Portfolio port_1_2_A Portfolio port_1_3_A Portfolio port_2_1_A Portfolio port_2_2_A Portfolio port_2_3_A Portfolio port_3_1_A Portfolio port_3_2_A Portfolio port_3_3_A Portfolio port_1_1_B Portfolio port_1_2_B Portfolio port_1_3_B Portfolio port_2_1_B Portfolio port_2_2_B Portfolio port_2_3_B Portfolio port_3_1_B Portfolio port_3_2_B Portfolio port_3_3_B Portfolio port_1_1_C Portfolio port_1_2_C Portfolio port_1_3_C Portfolio port_2_1_C Portfolio port_2_2_C Portfolio port_2_3_C Portfolio port_3_1_C Portfolio port_3_2_C Portfolio port_3_3_C Portfolio port_1_1_D Portfolio port_1_2_D Portfolio port_1_3_D Portfolio port_2_1_D Portfolio port_2_2_D Portfolio port_2_3_D Portfolio port_3_1_D Portfolio port_3_2_D Portfolio port_3_3_D
Cash
15.2% 4.3% 100.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 8.6% 8.6% 7.1% 4.3% 8.6% 7.1% 4.3% 4.3% 4.3% 13.3% 19.8% 28.8% 8.4% 12.5% 17.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Index-linked Gilts
9.9% 0.0% 35.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 35.0% 35.0% 11.5% 35.0% 35.0% 11.5% 35.0% 35.0% 35.0% 9.1% 9.1% 8.8% 6.1% 9.1% 8.8% 6.1% 6.1% 6.1% 5.1% 4.8% 0.0% 5.4% 5.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Fixed interest Gilts
8.2% 0.0% 54.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.8% 8.1% 2.0% 1.8% 8.1% 8.1% 8.1% 51.5% 47.7% 22.5% 54.4% 52.0% 26.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Overseas government inflation-linked bonds
1.4% 0.0% 10.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.0% 2.0% 1.9% 10.4% 2.0% 1.9% 10.4% 10.4% 10.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Overseas government fixed interest bonds
3.0% 0.0% 11.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 10.0% 11.0% 10.0% 10.0% 11.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.2% 0.0% 0.0% 4.2% 4.2% 4.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Corporate Bonds (fixed interest)
6.0% 0.0% 25.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 23.2% 23.2% 11.4% 25.6% 23.2% 11.4% 25.6% 25.6% 25.6% 5.1% 4.8% 0.2% 5.4% 5.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
UK Equities
17.2% 0.0% 50.6% 20.5% 20.5% 35.7% 20.5% 20.5% 35.7% 20.5% 20.5% 20.5% 9.0% 9.0% 22.0% 9.0% 9.0% 22.0% 9.0% 9.0% 9.0% 16.4% 16.4% 25.8% 5.2% 16.4% 25.8% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 20.3% 18.8% 43.8% 21.5% 20.6% 50.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Overseas Equities
10.5% 0.0% 26.5% 14.3% 14.3% 20.5% 14.3% 14.3% 20.5% 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 8.0% 8.0% 5.0% 8.0% 8.0% 5.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 17.6% 17.6% 26.5% 8.8% 17.6% 26.5% 8.8% 8.8% 8.8% 4.6% 4.3% 4.7% 4.9% 4.6% 5.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Property
1.2% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.0% 5.0% 3.5% 5.6% 5.0% 3.5% 5.6% 5.6% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Commodities
2.5% 0.0% 8.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.0% 8.0% 5.0% 8.0% 8.0% 5.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 3.5% 2.0% 2.0% 3.5% 3.5% 3.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Gilts (Fixed & Index-Linked)
0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Fixed Income
11.3% 0.0% 33.2% 33.2% 33.2% 17.8% 33.2% 33.2% 17.8% 33.2% 33.2% 33.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.2% 14.2% 11.2% 18.2% 14.2% 11.2% 18.2% 18.2% 18.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Alternatives Alternatives/Hedge Funds 6.4% 0.0% 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% 21.0% 27.0% 27.0% 21.0% 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
TOTAL
92.9% N.A. N.A. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.0% 75.0% 59.5% 75.0% 75.0% 59.5% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 100.1% 100.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%










































Total Bonds


33.2% 33.2% 17.8% 33.2% 33.2% 17.8% 33.2% 33.2% 33.2% 45.0% 45.0% 22.5% 45.0% 45.0% 22.5% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 50.5% 50.5% 35.1% 72.6% 50.5% 35.1% 72.6% 72.6% 72.6% 61.7% 57.2% 22.7% 65.2% 62.4% 26.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Minimum fixed interest element


33.2% 33.2% 17.8% 33.2% 33.2% 17.8% 33.2% 33.2% 33.2% 10.0% 10.0% 11.0% 10.0% 10.0% 11.0% 10.0% 10.0% 10.0% 39.4% 39.4% 24.4% 56.1% 39.4% 24.4% 56.1% 56.1% 56.1% 56.6% 52.4% 22.7% 59.8% 57.2% 26.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Fixed Interest % of Bonds


100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%








78.0% 78.0% 69.5% 77.3% 78.0% 69.5% 77.3% 77.3% 77.3% 91.7% 91.7% 100.0% 91.7% 91.7% 100.0%




















































































Table 3. Same distributions as in Table 2 but grouped into aggregate asset classes








































Asset Type Average Min Max Portfolio port_1_1_A Portfolio port_1_2_A Portfolio port_1_3_A Portfolio port_2_1_A Portfolio port_2_2_A Portfolio port_2_3_A Portfolio port_3_1_A Portfolio port_3_2_A Portfolio port_3_3_A Portfolio port_1_1_B Portfolio port_1_2_B Portfolio port_1_3_B Portfolio port_2_1_B Portfolio port_2_2_B Portfolio port_2_3_B Portfolio port_3_1_B Portfolio port_3_2_B Portfolio port_3_3_B Portfolio port_1_1_C Portfolio port_1_2_C Portfolio port_1_3_C Portfolio port_2_1_C Portfolio port_2_2_C Portfolio port_2_3_C Portfolio port_3_1_C Portfolio port_3_2_C Portfolio port_3_3_C Portfolio port_1_1_D Portfolio port_1_2_D Portfolio port_1_3_D Portfolio port_2_1_D Portfolio port_2_2_D Portfolio port_2_3_D Portfolio port_3_1_D Portfolio port_3_2_D Portfolio port_3_3_D

Bonds 39.9% 0.0% 72.6% 33.2% 33.2% 17.8% 33.2% 33.2% 17.8% 33.2% 33.2% 33.2% 45.0% 45.0% 22.5% 45.0% 45.0% 22.5% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% 50.5% 50.5% 35.1% 72.6% 50.5% 35.1% 72.6% 72.6% 72.6% 61.7% 57.2% 22.7% 65.2% 62.4% 26.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Equities 27.7% 0.0% 56.2% 34.8% 34.8% 56.2% 34.8% 34.8% 56.2% 34.8% 34.8% 34.8% 17.0% 17.0% 27.0% 17.0% 17.0% 27.0% 17.0% 17.0% 17.0% 34.0% 34.0% 52.3% 14.0% 34.0% 52.3% 14.0% 14.0% 14.0% 24.9% 23.1% 48.5% 26.3% 25.2% 56.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Cash 15.2% 4.3% 100.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 5.0% 8.6% 8.6% 7.1% 4.3% 8.6% 7.1% 4.3% 4.3% 4.3% 13.3% 19.8% 28.8% 8.4% 12.5% 17.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

Other 10.2% 0.0% 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% 21.0% 27.0% 27.0% 21.0% 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% 8.0% 8.0% 5.0% 8.0% 8.0% 5.0% 8.0% 8.0% 8.0% 7.0% 7.0% 5.5% 9.1% 7.0% 5.5% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

TOTAL 92.9% N.A. N.A. 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 75.0% 75.0% 59.5% 75.0% 75.0% 59.5% 75.0% 75.0% 75.0% 100.1% 100.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.1% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%


















































































NOTES







































Asset Allocation comments:







































All have a cash weighting (ranges from 4% to 100% of total portfolio)







































3 of 4 Firms use Alternatives/Hedge Funds (ranges from 5% to 27% of total portfolio).







































All have a UK Equity Weighting, apart from 1 case for 1 firm where 100% cash is recommended (ranges from 5% to 51% of total portfolio)







































All have an Overseas Equity Weighting, apart from 1 case for 1 firm where 100% cash is recommended (ranges from 4% to 27% of total portfolio)







































2 firms recommend a small property weighting (3% to 8% of portfolio)







































1 firm recommends a small commodity weighting (2% to 4% of portfolio)







































All have a bond weighting, apart from 1 case for 1 firm where 100% cash is recommended (ranges from 18% to 65% of total portfolio)







































Bond weightings are split and categorised differently by different firms, but the following observations hold:








































1 firm has all bond weightings in fixed interest (i.e. no index-linked bonds). Shown as 'Fixed Income' in asset allocation and referred to as Conventional Gilts /Government Stock in accompanying material.







































1 firm has a single weighting to Gilts (both fixed interest and index-linked), so can't tell the mix between fixed interest and index-linked







































Where an explicit split of bonds between fixed interest and index-linked is provided, the fixed interest portion of the bond allocation is dominant (fixed interest portion between 55% and 100% of bond element)






































Further breakdowns on asset classes invested and is provided in accompanying material for Firm A
















































































Firm-specific comments:







































Firm A only recommended 2 different portfolios across the 9 combinations. The riskier of the 2 is in relation to DR3 for 2 cases (i.e. lower compensation amount has led to needing to take more risk to meet needs)







































Firm B only recommended 2 different portfolios across the 9 combinations. The riskier of the 2 is in relation to DR3 for 2 cases (i.e. lower compensation amount has led to needing to take more risk to meet needs)







































Firm C only recommended 3 different portfolios across the 9 combinations. For given cases, if the lowest risk portfolio can provide for income needs then it is chosen. If not, the middle risk is chosen, unless this doesn't meet their income needs, at which the highest risk option is chosen







































Firm D recommends bespoke portfolios for each of 9 combinations. For Case 3 this has led to 100% cash for each option (since it is assumed that the compensation amount is enough to meet their future income requirements without investing under all 3 DR scenarios).







































For Firm D, the higher the compensation amount the lower the risk assumed in the portfolio. So when compensation is lowered more risk is needed to be taken in order to meet the claimant's needs.







































Firm B notes for some scenarios that only a portion of the compensation would be invested in the recommended portfolio, with the remainder left in cash – adjustments would be required to reflect this, but does not affect the broad portfolio analysis above








































Sheet 2: Controls & AQA log


Controls & AQA Log






















Overview





Analyst(s) XXXX

Commissioner/Customer XXXX

Purpose Summary of WMA questionnaire responses during Personal Injury Discount Rate Consultation.










Latest Agreed Version







Version Date of Sign-Off






20170523 - WMA questionnaire - aggregate responses - v1.xls 31-May-17
























Version Control







Version Date Analyst Description of changes

20170523 - WMA questionnaire - aggregate responses - v1.xls 5/23/2017 XXXX Original version.




































Checks Complete? Yes Relates to completed checks where no issues have been identified

Recommendation Relates to checks which have been carried out where no major issues have been identified but where there are recommendations for improvement

Issue Relates to checks which have identified major issues in the analysis which require action.

Outstanding Relates to checks which have not been completed due to time or resource constraints.



















AQA Log - Developer Testing







Version Item / Worksheet Checks Completed? Details of Checks Performed Comments / Issues Follow-up Action Complete? Related Documentation

20170523 - WMA questionnaire - aggregate responses - v1.xls Portfolio summaries Yes Reviewed worksheet for presentation. I don't really understand what the summaries for total bonds and minimum fixed interest are for.
RESPONSE: This was used to sense-check broad asset allocations. Some respondents provided various bonds separately while others only fixed income as a general group. This allows fixed income to be compared across all portfolios.
Yes


20170523 - WMA questionnaire - aggregate responses - v1.xls Portfolio summaries Recommendation Internal formulas of averages, min, max, summation draw from the correct data and give correct results. Some portfolio summations come to greater than 100%. This is an issue with the raw data.

RESPONSE: This is just a rounding issue - so has not been followed up.
Yes


20170523 - WMA questionnaire - aggregate responses - v1.xls Portfolio summaries Yes Spot checked that data in this sheet matches up with raw data. Results from Portfolio summaries spot checked against raw input data and no errors found. It can be assumed that the formulas in Portfolio Summaries draw from the correct tabs and that data has been inputted correctly. Yes


20170523 - WMA questionnaire - aggregate responses - v1.xls Portfolio source sheets Yes 1. Checked that the portfolio tables all correspond to named ranges as used on the Portfolio Summaries sheet.

2. Checked that the portfolio tables are as in the material provided by each firm.

3. Checked that the totals in the sources sum to 100%
All fine. Yes


20170523 - WMA questionnaire - aggregate responses - v1.xls Portfolio source sheets Yes Checked that other tables source the correct material from the original workbooks and documents provided. All numbers correct. Yes


Sheet 3: Contents
Contents 1 Portfolio - Case 1 (DR1) FIRM A
Portfolio Summaries 2 Portfolio - Case 1 (DR2) FIRM A
Performance & Risk Metrics 3 Portfolio - Case 1 (DR3) FIRM A
Data & Notes 4 Portfolio - Case 2 (DR1) FIRM A
Efficient Frontier Chart FIRM A 5 Portfolio - Case 2 (DR2) FIRM A
Text Box - ALL CASES FIRM A 6 Portfolio - Case 2 (DR3) FIRM A
Text Box - Case 1 FIRM B 7 Portfolio - Case 3 (DR1) FIRM A
Text Box - Case 2 FIRM B 8 Portfolio - Case 3 (DR2) FIRM A
Text Box - Case 3 FIRM B 9 Portfolio - Case 3 (DR3) FIRM A
Text Box - Case 1 FIRM C 10 Portfolio - Case 1 (DR1) FIRM B
Text Box - Case 2 FIRM C 11 Portfolio - Case 1 (DR2) FIRM B
Text Box - Case 3 FIRM C 12 Portfolio - Case 1 (DR3) FIRM B
Text Box - Case 1 FIRM D 13 Portfolio - Case 2 (DR1) FIRM B
Text Box - Case 2 FIRM D 14 Portfolio - Case 2 (DR2) FIRM B
Text Box - Case 3 FIRM D 15 Portfolio - Case 2 (DR3) FIRM B

16 Portfolio - Case 3 (DR1) FIRM B

17 Portfolio - Case 3 (DR2) FIRM B

18 Portfolio - Case 3 (DR3) FIRM B

19 Portfolio - Case 1 (DR1) FIRM C

20 Portfolio - Case 1 (DR2) FIRM C

21 Portfolio - Case 1 (DR3) FIRM C

22 Portfolio - Case 2 (DR1) FIRM C

23 Portfolio - Case 2 (DR2) FIRM C

24 Portfolio - Case 2 (DR3) FIRM C

25 Portfolio - Case 3 (DR1) FIRM C

26 Portfolio - Case 3 (DR2) FIRM C

27 Portfolio - Case 3 (DR3) FIRM C

28 Portfolio - Case 1 (DR1) FIRM D

29 Portfolio - Case 1 (DR2) FIRM D

30 Portfolio - Case 1 (DR3) FIRM D

31 Portfolio - Case 2 (DR1) FIRM D

32 Portfolio - Case 2 (DR2) FIRM D

33 Portfolio - Case 2 (DR3) FIRM D

34 Portfolio - Case 3 (DR1) FIRM D

35 Portfolio - Case 3 (DR2) FIRM D

36 Portfolio - Case 3 (DR3) FIRM D






Notes:

Firm A has also provided additional output in relation to each case, which is not included in this workbook, but can be found in the individual pdf files for each of the 9 combinations of Case & DR.

Firm B comments in text box indicate that the asset allocations provided in the portfolio tabs for certain Cases and DRs may only apply to a portion of the total compensation amount - see e-mail "RE: Firm B revised" (link below)

Firm B has also provided a confidentiality statement (see MoJ Cover Letter.pdf)

Firm D also provided portfolio recommendations in relation to an earlier set of pen pictures, which have not been considered in this exercise (see e-mails under link below)

Link to e-mail responses


The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Sheet portfolio summaries contents table codings used to identify the firm case study considered and discount rate dr applied award in see data amp notes for further details port a b c d asset allocations portfolios recommended by each under three example rates corresponding type other average min max cash indexlinked gilts fixed interest overseas government inflationlinked bonds corporate uk equities property commodities income alternatives alternativeshedge funds total na minimum element of...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.