179x Filetype XLSX File size 0.08 MB Source: www.hamermarketinggroup.com
Sheet 1: Instructions
Sales & Marketing Alignment Tool | |
Instructions | |
Use our Sales & Marketing Alignment Tool to assess the alignment between your Sales & Marketing functions. This prescriptive self-assessment tool allows you to rate your compliance with best practices across 6 different dimensions. |
Ranking Scale |
1. In the "Weighting" tab, weight the importance for each criteria. Be sure that your total weight equals no more or less than 100%. | 1 - Intial Ad/Hoc Process (poor) |
2. In the "Self Assessment (Mktg)" & "Self Assessment (Sales)" tabs, rank your organization utilizing the "Ranking Scale" on the right hand side. | 2 - Repeatable/Intuitive Process |
3. Check the "Alignment Index" tab to identify your current/goal state in each category. | 3 - Defined/Defining Process |
4. View the "Recommendations (Mktg)" & "Recommendations (Sales)" tabs for actionable advice on how to improve your capabilities. | 4 - Managed & Measured Process |
5 - Optimized Process (full) |
Sales & Marketing Alignment Tool | ||||||
Weighting Scale | ||||||
Organizational Relationships | Metrics and Value-Measurement |
Lead Generation & Pipeline Management |
Culture | Systems & Technology |
Messaging & Materials |
Total |
15% | 15% | 40% | 10% | 15% | 5% | 100% |
Marketing Assessment | ||||
Description | Level of Compliance | Score | Notes/Comments | |
Organizational Relationships | ||||
Understanding of Sales by Marketing | 1 | Marketing management lacks understanding of sales function, process, and skills | 1 | |
2 | Limited understanding of sales function by Marketing management | |||
3 | Good understanding of Sales by Marketing management, but less among staff | |||
4 | Understanding of Sales function encouraged among all Marketing staff | |||
5 | Understanding of Sales function/process required by all Marketing staff | |||
Understanding of Marketing by Sales | 1 | Sales Management lack understanding of Marketing best practices | 3 | |
2 | Limited understanding of Marketing function & role by Sales Management | |||
3 | Good understanding of Marketing function & role by Sales Management | |||
4 | Understanding of Marketing function & role encouraged among all Sales staff | |||
5 | Understanding of Marketing function & role required for all Sales staff | |||
Organizational Development, Training, & Learning | 1 | Casual conversations and meetings on ad hoc basis | 4 | |
2 | Casual conversations and ad hoc meetings among select staff and managers | |||
3 | Newsletters, reports, emails are sent out, some formal meetings between groups | |||
4 | Formal alignment program sponsored by Senior Management | |||
5 | Formal alignment program required - widespread participation across Sales & MT | |||
Communications Style and Ease of Access | 1 | Marketing to Sales only, generally only when new materials/programs roll out | 3 | |
2 | Marketing to Sales only, somewhat informal, occasionally asking for feedback | |||
3 | Consistent two-way, formal communications around specific activities & programs | |||
4 | Consistent blend of formal & informal among sales and marketing management | |||
5 | Two-way, formal and informal communications, continuous feedback loop | |||
Relationship Definitions | 1 | Undefined. Functions have developed independently and are focused on their own tasks | 4 | |
2 | Starting to Define. Efforts underway to prevent disputes, establish common language, and clarify expectations | |||
3 | Defined. Common language, few disputes, regular meetings to clarify mutual expectations | |||
4 | Aligned. Clear but flexible boundaries, common language, joint planning | |||
5 | Integrated. Share systems, performance metrics, and rewards together. | |||
Collaboration, Trust & Credibility | 1 | Two groups are at odds, open criticism, lack of cooperation, finger-pointing is common | 3 | |
2 | Relationships are polite but strained, collaboration is rare, groups work in silos | |||
3 | Relationships improving, but open sharing and collaboration is sporadic | |||
4 | Sales & Marketing Management work together well, staff less likely to collaborate | |||
5 | Trust is high. All staff in both groups work well together openly, productively. | |||
Metrics & Value-Measurement | ||||
Campaign ROI Maturity | 1 | Operational Marketing metrics only (email click thru rates etc.) | 5 | |
2 | Marketing metrics and some cost metrics; metrics rarely reviewed | |||
3 | Review and act on marketing, cost, and campaign ROI metrics | |||
4 | Metrics for each process/campaign are defined and measured | |||
5 | Marketing metrics analyzed to inform resource allocation decisions | |||
Marketing Metrics Maturity | 1 | Marketing campaigns & investments measured rarely, if ever | 2 | |
2 | Cost/Lead, Cost/Sale measured, but rarely reviewed | |||
3 | Review and act on ROI and cost metrics for all marketing efforts | |||
4 | Measure Return on Customer (net present value of customer base) | |||
5 | Balanced Scorecard to set objectives, measures, targets, initiatives | |||
Link between Marketing and Sales Metrics | 1 | Value of Marketing investments rarely measured by Sales | 1 | |
2 | Sales/Marketing metrics not linked, no cause-effect relationships | |||
3 | Metrics becoming linked and understood by Marketing & Sales | |||
4 | Metrics formally linked, reviewed, major issues acted upon | |||
5 | Marketing/Sales metrics are used together to provide predictive insight | |||
Alignment Improvement Practices | 1 | None | 2 | |
2 | Sporadic projects/events in place to improve sales & marketing alignment | |||
3 | May benchmark alignment formally, but benchmarks are seldom acted upon | |||
4 | Routinely benchmark sales & marketing alignment and act upon insights | |||
5 | Alignment benchmarks, initiatives, & progress are required | |||
Financial Performance | 1 | Very little/no forecasting | 1 | |
2 | Sales figures are dramatically higher or lower than forecast | |||
3 | Sales forecasting is improving and variances are getting smaller | |||
4 | Sales figures are often close to the forecast, but not always | |||
5 | Sales figures are usually close to the forecast | |||
Lead Generation & Pipeline Management | ||||
Demand Generation | 1 | No demand generation campaigns, Sales develops their own leads | 2 | |
2 | Marketing demand generation and sales demand generation happen separately | |||
3 | Marketing executes demand generation campaigns. Leads passed to sales & may/may not be followed up on | |||
4 | Marketing executes demand generation, qualified leads are passed on and sales follows up | |||
5 | Synchronized demand generation program managed dually by sales & marketing | |||
Lead Scoring & Management | 1 | No lead scoring or qualification - all leads get passed to sales | 1 | |
2 | Leads are qualified by Marketing, but sales does not systematically work them | |||
3 | Improving lead qualification and pass-along process, but leads are not always worked | |||
4 | Formal shared lead definitions and processes for passing leads to sales | |||
5 | Optimized lead scoring & management process with formal processes in place | |||
Pipeline Reporting & Visibility | 1 | We have no formal pipeline reporting | 2 | |
2 | Sales informally reports pipeline information, but Marketing is not involved | |||
3 | Sales management shares formal pipeline reports with marketing management | |||
4 | Sales & marketing staff have access to the same pipeline & use it sporadically to check lead gen. effectiveness | |||
5 | Marketing & Sales openly share pipeline and work together to improve the flow of leads in the sales process | |||
Culture | ||||
Executive Alignment | 1 | Marketing & Sales report up through siloed executives | 1 | |
2 | Marketing & Sales executives report to the same senior leader, but do not collaborate | |||
3 | Marketing & Sales executives are starting to work more collaboratively | |||
4 | Marketing & Sales executives are close partners and collaborators | |||
5 | Marketing & Sales report to a common executive | |||
Shared Risks and Rewards | 1 | Very little risk being taken on either side, rewards not tied to joint success | 2 | |
2 | One side takes all the risk, rewards are shared | |||
3 | Marketing and Sales start sharing risks and rewards | |||
4 | Risks and rewards are always shared between Sales & Marketing | |||
5 | Managers on both sides share in risks and rewards | |||
Marketing-Sales Relationship | 1 | Finger pointing, blame and battles for power and resources are common | 2 | |
2 | Marketing-business relationship isn't managed or is non-existent | |||
3 | Marketing-Sales relationship managed on ad hoc basis, mostly conflict resolution | |||
4 | Mostly collaborative and cooperative relationship, proactively working together | |||
5 | Sales and Marketing share a strong "We rise or fall together culture" | |||
Relationship/Trust Style | 1 | Consistent conflict and mistrust between Marketing & business | 1 | |
2 | Transactional relationship between Marketing & Sales, occasional conflict | |||
3 | Marketing becoming a valued service provider and relationships are strengthening | |||
4 | Long-term partnership is emerging as credibility is increased on both sides | |||
5 | Marketing and Sales are trusted partners and collaborate closely on all fronts | |||
Systems & Technology | ||||
Marketing Automation | 1 | No marketing automation, campaigns are ad hoc, project driven, or by request | 2 | |
2 | Processes are becoming defined, technology is used sporadically | |||
3 | Technology is implemented to automate key marketing processes | |||
4 | Process metrics exist and are benchmarked and reviewed often | |||
5 | Real-time messaging, lead scoring & nurturing, closed loop systems | |||
Sales Automation | 1 | No Sales Automation system in place | 1 | |
2 | Sales automation system in place (Salesforce.com, Right Now, etc.) but not widely/consistently used by sales | |||
3 | Sales automation system in place, use required - some data is inconsistent, missing, outdated | |||
4 | System in place, widely used by sales, data is reliable and current | |||
5 | Sales automation system is required by sales mgmt., drives pipeline reports and revenue projection | |||
System Integration | 1 | Systems are disparate and siloed. Access is ad hoc and manual | 2 | |
2 | Systems are siloed. Standard reports are automated, but rarely used | |||
3 | Beginning to link systems to provide a shared view of customer & sales data | |||
4 | Major systems are integrated and key reports are automated & widely used for decision-making & forecasting | |||
5 | Shared view of customer for sales & marketing. Data is complete, current, and clean | |||
Access to Data & Data Management | 1 | Customer and prospect data resides in multiple places, difficult to access, ad hoc data pulling | 1 | |
2 | Processes are becoming defined, technology is used sporadically | |||
3 | Technology is implemented to automate key marketing processes | |||
4 | Process metrics exists and are benchmarked and reviewed often | |||
5 | Sales & Marketing have a single, shared view of customer data and automated or formal processes | |||
Messaging & Materials | ||||
Marketing Materials & Collateral | 1 | Collateral from marketing is often thrown away by sales. Lots of home-grown rogue materials in the field | 2 | |
2 | Marketing collateral is distributed by marketing, sometimes used | |||
3 | Marketing is beginning to seek sales input on marketing collateral, and rogue materials are diminishing | |||
4 | Sales has input on collateral, mostly satisfied -- collateral is consistently used | |||
5 | Sales and marketing collaborate on marketing materials. Collateral is highly valued and consistently used | |||
Messaging & Brand | 1 | Sales messaging in the field is completely different than the official marketing messages | 1 | |
2 | Sales is aware of the official marketing message, but often chooses different/old messages in the selling process | |||
3 | Sales is beginning to integrate marketing and brand messages into their sales discussions | |||
4 | Sales often echoes marketing messages, but not always | |||
5 | Sales and marketing messages are completely in sync |
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.