307x Filetype DOCX File size 0.99 MB Source: www.law.ox.ac.uk
Commercial Law Centre
Harris-Manchester College
Mansfield Road
Oxford OX1 3TD
United Kingdom
clc@hmc.ox.ac.uk
Update - November 2015
Comparative Commercial Law Project
This document summarises initial steps in the comparative commercial law project
(the CCL Project), a research undertaking under the auspices of the Commercial
Law Centre (the Centre) at Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford (HMC).
Transnational commercial law (TCL) is taught in many jurisdictions and law schools
worldwide. Research developed through the CCL Project aims to fill a critical gap in
the teaching of TCL. That gap is the limited knowledge of the students about (i) the
underlying transactions (except contracts, which they are likely to have studied) that
are the subject of TCL instruments, and (ii) the basic legal principles, more so on a
comparative basis, that govern such transactions. Such comparative commercial law
(including the underlying transactions, CCL) is central to understanding the process
of creating, and content of, TCL instruments, even where the latter seek to advance
best international rules rather than set out a common denominator of legal
approaches.
There is a need for, if not a complete companion course for TCL, at least a set of
basic materials that TCL teachers can provide students, on CCL.
This project, headed by Jeffrey Wool, condon-falknor professor of global business law
at the University of Washington School of Law and senior research fellow at HMC,
will develop such basic and/or course materials on CCL. This is an open project in
the sense of inviting collaboration with interested others. Collaboration with UW
law school is being explored. The results of the CCL Project would be shared globally,
including, without restriction, with teachers of TCL.
Separate from its key linkage to TCL, CCL merits study and development as an
academic end in itself.
Annexed hereto are:
-- A schematic depiction of the CCL Project (Annex I)
-- An outline of first step in the CCL Project: the development of basic materials
for a new course, which, alternatively, can be assigned materials in TCL, called
‘Comparative Commercial Law: Transactional Perspectives’ (Annex II)
-- The initial archetype transaction and fact pattern to be used in that new
course (described further below)(Annex III)
1
-- The template for jurisdictional outlines and bibliographies related to that
transaction and fact pattern (described below) and the form for compiling the
jurisdictional replies (Annex IV-A and IV-B, respectively)
To make CCL Project both practical and efficient, we have secured the support of
major international law firms with global expertise (the supporting firms) to provide
support in terms of content. These firms, listed alphabetically, are: Abogados Sierra y
Vazques; Clyde & Co.; Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer; Holland Knight; King &
Wood Mallesons; and Weil, Gotshal & Manges. The University of Paris has also
contributed on equal footing with the supporting firms and is viewed in similar
terms in the balance of this memo. Others may be added.
The supporting firms will be publicly recognised as the firms supporting the CCL
Project, including on the HMC/Centre website and in correspondence and
communications.
The supporting (each doing pieces, not jointly) have done the following (the
supporting firms’ tasks) under Professor Wool’s supervision:
(1) drafted sets of transaction documents (transaction documents)
reflecting hypothetical fact patterns covering archetype transactions and raising
basic legal issues in such transactions (as set out below, and which correspond to
TCL instruments, the archetype transactions),
(2) prepared outlines, following a common format based on a set of
questions, on the basic legal concepts applicable to, and sources of law that govern,
the archetype transactions and applied the same to the fact pattern under the laws
of each of England New York, France, Germany, Mexico, New York, United Arab
Emirates, and China (the subject jurisdictions), and helped to build the
bibliography and provided source materials relating to the foregoing for each subject
jurisdiction (jurisdictional outlines and bibliographies). The subject jurisdictions
were selected to cover a cross section of common law, civil law (Napoleonic and
Roman-Germanic), Islamic-impacted law, and developing jurisdictional law.
The initial archetype transaction and fact pattern covers contracts, security,
insolvency, and surety. It is set out in Annex III.1 The initial jurisdictional outlines
and bibliographies would follow the template attached as Annex IV-A.
These materials – in draft form – were used in a CCL tutorial [Comparative
Commercial Law: Transactional Perspective] taught this summer at the University of
Washington School of Law. Student (JD and (non-US) LLM) . Feedback from the
students was obtained. That feedback, and the observations from the tutorial set on
in Annex V, will be considered in further development of the materials.
A presentation on the CCL Project will be made to the next TCL teachers’ conference
(Perth, November), where others will be asked to develop other archetype
1 In due course, there would be other archetype transactions, including payment systems, transport of
goods, and intermediated securities.
transactions and fact patterns and more generally become involved in the CCL
Project.
END
SEE ANNEXES
Annex I
Comparative Commercial Law Project
(Commercial Law Centre, HMC, Oxford)
Courses Transaction / Comparative Transnational
DoingBusiness / Commercial Law Commercial Law
Lawyering
Objectives Understanding Substantive and Extracting General
Commercial Comparative Principles of
Transactions Commercial Law Commercial Law
4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.