286x Filetype PDF File size 0.17 MB Source: career.fsu.edu
Career Decision-Making Difficulties Questionnaire Diverse Populations Literature Review
Author, Title Sample Variables Measures Major Findings
Year
Albion, M. Factors influencing Study 1: 121 Career decision status CDDQ In adolescents & adults, multidimensional model of
J., & career decision making Australian Personality type IPIP Five-Factor CDDQ fit both groups
Fogarty, G. in adolescents and adolescents, 78 General intellectual Domain Scale 5 first-order factors fit better than 3
J. (2002) adults females, 43 males, functioning Shipley Institute of In adolescents, the categories of difficulties in the
mean age, 15.92 years, Interests Living Scale CDDQ were significant determinants of decision status
Study 2: 127 IDEAS Interest In adults, the Internal Conflicts & Lack of Knowledge
Australian adults: 86 Inventory about Additional Sources subscales had relatively low
females, 41 males, Personal Attributes internal consistency
mean age 33.44 years Questionnaire
Amir, T., & Facets of career 299 students (42% Measured career decision- CDDQ Career decision-making difficulties showed: high
Gati, I. decision-making female), at Israeli making difficulties Expressed positive correlation with expressed career decision-
(2006) difficulties university; mean age: Expressed career decision- Difficulties making difficulties, negative correlation with career
22.3 years making difficulties Questionnaire decision-making self-efficacy & decidedness
Career decision-making Career Decision- Career decision-making style positively correlated with
self-efficacy Making Self- career decision-making self-efficacy & related to level
Vocational decision- Efficacy Scale of career decision-making difficulties
making style Vocational Career decision-making difficulties were lower for
Degree of decidedness Decision Style introvert & thinking styles
Cognitive and scholastic Indicator No relationship between cognitive/scholastic ability &
ability Psychometric career decision-making difficulties
Entrance Test
Creed, P. Reliability and validity 514 Chinese high Psychometric properties CDDQ 2 stable factors for CDDQ: Lack of Information and
A., & Yin, of a Chinese version of school students of CDDQ in terms of Career Decision- Inconsistent Information
W. O. the Career Decision- factor structure, reliability, Making Self- Did not confirm readiness to make a career decision
(2006) Making Difficulties & validity Efficacy Scale
Questionnaire Occupational
Barriers Scale
Di Fabio, Career decision 424 Italian apprentices, Relation between career CDDQ Negative correlations among 3 CDDQ dimensions &
A., & difficulties and mean age 21.13 decision difficulties & Bar-On Emotional total EI score
Palazzeschi emotional intelligence: emotional intelligence Quotient Inventory: Intrapersonal dimension of EI best predictor of CDDQ
, L. (2008) Some empirical Short dimensions
evidence in an Italian
sample of wage-
earning apprentices
Author, Title Sample Variables Measures Major Findings
Year
Gati, I., & Internet-based versus Hebrew version paper Version (Translation) of Internet version, Hebrew sample had similar internal consistency &
Saka, N. paper-and-pencil & pencil: 417 CDDQ CDDQ, English reliability between the Internet and paper & pencil
(2001) assessment: Measuring recently discharged Medium of CDDQ Internet version, versions (r=.87, r=.88); similar structure derivation
career decision-making soldiers; Internet: 859 administration CDDQ, Hebrew from 10 categories
difficulties participants Paper & pencil English sample had high correspondence between two
English version paper version, CDDQ media
& pencil: 403 college English
students; Internet Paper & pencil
sample: 182 version, CDDQ
participants Hebrew
Li, X. A report on revised 1182 Chinese college Reliability of the Chinese CDDQ, Chinese Cronbach alpha ranged from .48-.87
(2007) Career Decision- students version of the CDDQ version Good construct validity, discriminant validity, &
Making Difficulty Validity of the Chinese criterion-related validity
Questionnaire version of the CDDQ Seems to have psychometric reliability, but more
confirmation is needed
Pečjak, S., Personality, 641 Slovenian 4th grade Personality CDDQ, Slovene Significant differences between career decided and
& Košir, K. motivational factors students (38.7% boys, Motivational factors version undecided students on personality and motivational
(2007) and difficulties in 61.3% girls) Career decision-making Big-Five Inventory, variables
career decision-making difficulties Short, Personality and motivational factors explained 28% of
in secondary school Career decidedness Self-regulation the variance in career decision-making
students Inventory, Short
Satisfaction with
life scale
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.