218x Filetype PDF File size 0.17 MB Source: www.mas.gov.sg
CONSULTATION PAPER ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SF(RDC)R Annex C UTI-GENERATION FLOWCHART STRICTLY FOLLOWING CPMI-IOSCO WATERFALL Diagram A Legend Is the contract centrally- Is a CCP a counterparty to Is the CCP able and willing The CCP should Blue shapes – show steps in line with CPMI- cleared? Yes the contract? Yes to generate the UTI? Yes generate the UTI IOSCO Waterfall No No No Green shapes – show additional steps proposed in paragraph 2.14 of the consultation paper to cater to the scenario Is a clearing member (who is Is the clearing member The clearing member where a CCP, clearing member or trading acting in its capacity as a Yes able and willing to Yes should generate the venue may be unable or unwilling to generate clearing member) a generate a UTI? UTI the UTI. 1 counterparty to the contract? No Grey shapes – show the end of a step Is the counterparty (who is The counterparty (who is not the CCP or the clearing Yes not the CCP or the clearing member) able and willing to member) to the contract generate a UTI? should generate the UTI No Is the contract centrally- Is the contract a cross- executed on a trading No jurisdictional contract? Yes See Diagram B venue? Yes No Is the trading venue able Do both counterparties Is the contract Do counterparties have The agreed entity and willing to generate No have reporting obligations Yes electronically confirmed or No an agreement on who Yes should generate the the UTI? under the SF(RDC)R? will it be electronically should generate the UTI confirmed? UTI? Yes No Yes No Is the confirmation Will the contract be Is that trade repository The trade repository platform able and willing No reported to a single Yes able and willing to Yes should generate the to generate the UTI? trade repository? generate a UTI? UTI Yes No No The trading venue The counterparty with reporting The confirmation The counterparty whose identifier is first, should generate the obligations should generate the UTI or platform should based on sorting the counterparties’ identifier UTI may delegate the responsibility to an generate the UTI with the characters of the identifier reversed, agreeable entity should generate the UTI 1 Footnote 1: One of the counterparties to a centrally-cleared contract must be either a CCP or a clearing member (who is acting in his capacity as clearing member). Thus, it is not possible to have “no” to this question. CONSULTATION PAPER ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SF(RDC)R Diagram B UTI is to be generated Legend Is the contract a cross- Does one jurisdiction have according to the rules of Blue shapes – show steps in line with CPMI- jurisdictional contract? Yes a sooner reporting Yes the jurisdiction with the IOSCO Waterfall deadline? sooner reporting deadline Green shapes – show additional steps No No proposed in paragraph 2.14 of the consultation paper to cater to the scenario Do counterparties have The agreed entity where a CCP, clearing member or trading See Diagram A an agreement on who Yes should generate the venue may be unable or unwilling to generate should generate the UTI the UTI. UTI? Grey shapes – show the end of a step No Is the contract Is the confirmation The confirmation electronically confirmed or Yes platform able and Yes platform should will it be electronically willing to generate the generate the UTI confirmed? UTI? No No Will the contract be Is that trade repository The trade repository reported to a single Yes able and willing to Yes should generate the trade repository? generate a UTI? UTI No No The counterparty whose identifier is first, based on sorting the counterparties’ identifier with the characters of the identifier reversed, should generate the UTI 2
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.