424x Filetype PDF File size 0.17 MB Source: www.mas.gov.sg
CONSULTATION PAPER ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SF(RDC)R
Annex C
UTI-GENERATION FLOWCHART STRICTLY FOLLOWING CPMI-IOSCO WATERFALL
Diagram A
Legend
Is the contract centrally- Is a CCP a counterparty to Is the CCP able and willing The CCP should Blue shapes – show steps in line with CPMI-
cleared? Yes the contract? Yes to generate the UTI? Yes generate the UTI IOSCO Waterfall
No No No Green shapes – show additional steps
proposed in paragraph 2.14 of the
consultation paper to cater to the scenario
Is a clearing member (who is Is the clearing member The clearing member where a CCP, clearing member or trading
acting in its capacity as a Yes able and willing to Yes should generate the venue may be unable or unwilling to generate
clearing member) a generate a UTI? UTI the UTI.
1
counterparty to the contract?
No Grey shapes – show the end of a step
Is the counterparty (who is The counterparty (who is
not the CCP or the clearing Yes not the CCP or the clearing
member) able and willing to member) to the contract
generate a UTI? should generate the UTI
No
Is the contract centrally- Is the contract a cross-
executed on a trading No jurisdictional contract? Yes See Diagram B
venue?
Yes No
Is the trading venue able Do both counterparties Is the contract Do counterparties have The agreed entity
and willing to generate No have reporting obligations Yes electronically confirmed or No an agreement on who Yes should generate the
the UTI? under the SF(RDC)R? will it be electronically should generate the UTI
confirmed? UTI?
Yes No Yes No
Is the confirmation Will the contract be Is that trade repository The trade repository
platform able and willing No reported to a single Yes able and willing to Yes should generate the
to generate the UTI? trade repository? generate a UTI? UTI
Yes No No
The trading venue The counterparty with reporting The confirmation The counterparty whose identifier is first,
should generate the obligations should generate the UTI or platform should based on sorting the counterparties’ identifier
UTI may delegate the responsibility to an generate the UTI with the characters of the identifier reversed,
agreeable entity should generate the UTI
1
Footnote 1: One of the counterparties to a centrally-cleared contract must be either a CCP or a clearing member (who is acting in his capacity as clearing member). Thus, it is not possible to have “no” to this question.
CONSULTATION PAPER ON PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SF(RDC)R
Diagram B
UTI is to be generated Legend
Is the contract a cross- Does one jurisdiction have according to the rules of Blue shapes – show steps in line with CPMI-
jurisdictional contract? Yes a sooner reporting Yes the jurisdiction with the IOSCO Waterfall
deadline? sooner reporting deadline
Green shapes – show additional steps
No No proposed in paragraph 2.14 of the
consultation paper to cater to the scenario
Do counterparties have The agreed entity where a CCP, clearing member or trading
See Diagram A an agreement on who Yes should generate the venue may be unable or unwilling to generate
should generate the UTI the UTI.
UTI?
Grey shapes – show the end of a step
No
Is the contract Is the confirmation The confirmation
electronically confirmed or Yes platform able and Yes platform should
will it be electronically willing to generate the generate the UTI
confirmed? UTI?
No No
Will the contract be Is that trade repository The trade repository
reported to a single Yes able and willing to Yes should generate the
trade repository? generate a UTI? UTI
No No
The counterparty whose identifier is first,
based on sorting the counterparties’ identifier
with the characters of the identifier reversed,
should generate the UTI
2
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.