jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Matrix Pdf 174623 | Alglintrans


 150x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.15 MB       Source: www2.clarku.edu


File: Matrix Pdf 174623 | Alglintrans
then the two compositions are ba 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 algebra of linear transformations and ab 1 0 0 1 0 1 ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 28 Jan 2023 | 2 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
                                                             Then the two compositions are
                                                                                                
                                                                  BA = 0 −1 1 0 = 0 1
                                                                             1   0    0 −1       1 0
           Algebra of linear transformations and                                                    
                                                                  AB = 1 0 0 −1 = 0 −1
                             matrices                                        0 −1 1 0            −1 0
                   Math 130 Linear Algebra
                         DJoyce, Fall 2013                   The products aren’t the same.
                                                               You can perform these on physical objects. Take
           We’ve looked at the operations of addition and                              ◦
                                                             a book. First rotate it 90 then flip it over. Start
         scalar multiplication on linear transformations and again but flip first then rotate 90◦. The book ends
         used them to define addition and scalar multipli- up in different orientations.
         cation on matrices. For a given basis β on V and
         another basis γ on W, we have an isomorphism Matrix multiplication is associative. Al-
          γ                ≃
         φ : Hom(V,W) → M           of vector spaces which
          β                     m×n                          though it’s not commutative, it is associative.
         assigns to a linear transformation T : V → W its That’s because it corresponds to composition of
         standard matrix [T]γ.
                            β                                functions, and that’s associative. Given any three
           Wealso have matrix multiplication which corre- functions f, g, and h, we’ll show (f ◦ g) ◦ h =
         sponds to composition of linear transformations. If f ◦ (g ◦ h) by showing the two sides have the same
         A is the standard matrix for a transformation S, values for all x.
         and B is the standard matrix for a transformation
         T, then we defined multiplication of matrices so        ((f ◦ g) ◦ h)(x) = (f ◦ g)(h(x)) = f(g(h(x)))
         that the product AB is be the standard matrix for
         S◦T.                                                while
           There are a few more things we should look at        (f ◦ (g ◦ h))(x) = f((g ◦ h)(x)) = f(g(h(x))).
         for matrix multiplication.  It’s not commutative.
         It is associative. It distributes with matrix addi- They’re the same.
         tion. There are identity matrices I for multiplica-   Since composition of functions is associative, and
         tion. Cancellation doesn’t work. You can compute linear transformations are special kinds of func-
         powers of square matrices. And scalar matrices.     tions, therefore composition of linear transforma-
                                                             tions is associative. Since matrix multiplication
         Matrix multiplication is not commutative. corresponds to composition of linear transforma-
         It shouldn’t be. It corresponds to composition of tions, therefore matrix multiplication is associative.
         linear transformations, and composition of func-      An alternative proof would actually involve
         tions is not commutative.                           computations, probably with summation notation,
         Example 1. Let’s take a 2-dimensional geometric something like
         example. Let T be rotation 90◦ clockwise, and S be                                      !
         reflection across the x-axis. We’ve looked at those                    Xa Xb c
                                                                                    ij      jk kl
         before. The standard matrices A for S and B for                        j        k
         T are                                                             = Xa b c
                                                                                  ij jk kl
                          A = 1 0                                               j,k           !
                                  0 −1                                         X X
                                                                         =            a b     c .
                                  0 −1                                                    ij jk  kl
                          B = 1 0                                               k     j
                                                           1
         Matrix multiplication distributes over ma- AI = A = IA are different. For example,
         trix addition.    When A, B, and C are the right                       4    5 6  1 0 0 
         shape matrices so the the operations can be per-                                     0 1 0 
         formed, then the the following are always identities:                   3 −1 0         0 0 1
                      A(B+C) = AB+AC                                       =  4      5 6 
                      (A+B)C = AC+BC                                             3 −1 0
                                                                           =  1 0  4         5 6 .
         Whydoesitwork? It suffices to show that it works                          0 1       3 −1 0
         for linear transformations. Suppose that R, S, and
         T are their linear transformations. The correspond- Cancellation doesn’t work for matrix multi-
         ing identities are                                     plication!   Notonlyis matrix multiplication non-
                                                                commutative, but the cancellation law doesn’t hold
                 R◦(S+T) = (R◦S)+(R◦T)                          for it. You’re familiar with cancellation for num-
                 (R+S)◦T = (R◦T)+(S◦T)                          bers: if xy = xz but x 6= 0, then y = z. But we
                                                                can come up with matrices so that AB = AC and
         Simply evaluate them at a vector v and see that                                                   1 0 
                                                                A 6= 0, but B 6= C. For example A =          0 0 ,
         you get the same thing. Here’s the first identity.            1 0               1 0 
         You’ll need to use linearity of R at one point.        B=            , and C =           .
                                                                       0 3                 0 4
               (R◦(S+T))(v) = R((S+T)(v)                        Powers of matrices. Frequently, we’ll multiply
                                   = R(S(v+T(v)                 square matrices by themselves (you can only mul-
                                   = R(S(v))+R(T(v))            tiply square matrices by themselves), and we’ll use
         ((R◦S)+(R◦T))(v) = (R◦S)(v)+(R◦T)(v) the standard notation for powers. The expression
                                   = R(S(v))+R(T(v))            Ap stands for the product of p copies of A. Since
                                                                matrix multiplication is associative, this definition
                                                                works, so long as p is a positive integer. But we can
         The identity matrices. Just like there are ma- extend the definition to p = 0 by making A0 = I,
         trices that work as additive identities (we denoted and the usual properties will will still hold. That is,
         them all 0 as described above), there are matrices      p  q     p+q        p q     pq
                                                                A A =A        and (A ) = A . Later, we’ll extend
         that work as multiplicative identities, and we’ll de-  powers to the case when A is an invertible matrix
         note them all I and all them identity matrices. An and the power p is a negative integer.
         identity matrix is a square n by n matrix with 1         Warning: because matrix multiplication is not
         down the diagonal and 0 elsewhere. You could de- commutative in general, it is usually the case that
         note them In to emphasize their sizes, but you can          p     p  p
         always tell by the context what its size is, so we’ll  (AB) 6= A B .
         leave out the index n. By the way, whenever you’ve Scalar matrices.         A scalar matrix is a matrix
         got a square n by n matrix, you can say the order with the scalar r down the diagonal. That’s the
         of the matrix is n. Anyway, I acts like an identity same thing as the scalar r times the identity ma-
         matrix                                                 trix. For instance,
                            AI =A=IA.                                                          
                                                                           4 0 0           1 0 0
         Note that if A is not a square matrix, then the                                       
                                                                           0 4 0 =4 0 1 0 =4I.
         orders of the two identity matrices I in the identity             0 0 4           0 0 1
                                                              2
    Among other things, that means that we can iden-
    tify a scalar matrix with the scalar.
    Math  130 Home  Page at
    http://math.clarku.edu/~djoyce/ma130/
                          3
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Then the two compositions are ba algebra of linear transformations and ab matrices math djoyce fall products aren t same you can perform these on physical objects take we ve looked at operations addition a book first rotate it ip over start scalar multiplication again but rst ends used them to dene multipli up in dierent orientations cation for given basis v another w have an isomorphism matrix is associative al hom m vector spaces which n though s not commutative assigns transformation its that because corresponds composition standard functions any three wealso corre f g h ll show sponds if by showing sides values all x b dened so product be st while there few more things should look distributes with addi they re tion identity i multiplica since cancellation doesn work compute special kinds func powers square tions therefore transforma shouldn alternative proof would actually involve computations probably summation notation example let dimensional geometric something like rotation clo...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.