jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Calculus Of Variations Pdf 170998 | Tatiana Odzijewicz Torres


 145x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.13 MB       Source: faculty.fiu.edu


File: Calculus Of Variations Pdf 170998 | Tatiana Odzijewicz Torres
calculus of variations with fractional and classical derivatives tatiana odzijewicz delm f m torres department of mathematics university of aveiro 3810 193 aveiro portugal e mail tatianao ua pt department ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 26 Jan 2023 | 2 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
                                               Calculus of Variations with Fractional
                                                           and Classical Derivatives
                                                      Tatiana Odzijewicz∗ Delfim F. M. Torres∗∗
                                                     ∗ Department of Mathematics, University of Aveiro
                                                    3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal (e-mail: tatianao@ua.pt)
                                                     ∗∗ Department of Mathematics, University of Aveiro
                                                      3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal (e-mail: delfim@ua.pt)
                          Abstract: Wegiveaproperfractionalextensionoftheclassicalcalculus of variations. Necessary
                          optimality conditions of Euler-Lagrange type for variational problems containing both fractional
                          and classical derivatives are proved. The fundamental problem of the calculus of variations with
                          mixed integer and fractional order derivatives as well as isoperimetric problems are considered.
                          Keywords: variational analysis; optimality; Riemann-Liouville fractional operators; fractional
                          differentiation; isoperimetric problems.
                                  1. INTRODUCTION                                     anditsapplications have been written—see, e.g., [Agrawal,
                                                                                      2002, Agrawal and Baleanu, 2007, Almeida and Torres,
            One of the classical problems of mathematics consists in                  2009a, 2010, Atanackovi´c et al., 2008, Baleanu, 2008, El-
            finding a closed plane curve of a given length that encloses               Nabulsi and Torres, 2007, Frederico and Torres, 2007,
            the greatest area: the isoperimetric problem. The legend                  2008, Klimek, 2002, Malinowska and Torres, 2010] and
            says that the first person who solved the isoperimetric                    references therein. For the study of fractional isoperimetric
            problem was Dido, the queen of Carthage, who was offered                   problems see [Almeida et al., 2009].
            as much land as she could surround with the skin of a                     In the pioneering paper [Agrawal, 2002], and others that
            bull. Dido’s problem is nowadays part of the calculus of                  followed, the fractional necessary optimality conditions are
            variations [Gelfand and Fomin, 1963, van Brunt, 2004].                    proved under the hypothesis that admissible functions y
            Fractional calculus is a generalization of (integer) differ-               have continuous left and right fractional derivatives on the
            ential calculus, allowing to define derivatives (and inte-                 closed interval [a,b]. By considering that the admissible
            grals) of real or complex order [Kilbas et al., 2006, Miller              functions y have continuous left fractional derivatives on
            and Ross, 1993, Podlubny, 1999]. The first application of                  the whole interval, then necessarily y(a) = 0; by consider-
            fractional calculus belongs to Niels Henrik Abel (1802–                   ing that the admissible functions y have continuous right
            1829) and goes back to 1823 [Abel, 1965]. Abel applied the                fractional derivatives, then necessarily y(b) = 0. This fact
            fractional calculus to the solution of an integral equation               has been independently remarked, in different contexts, at
            which arises in the formulation of the tautochrone problem.               least in [Almeida et al., 2009, Almeida and Torres, 2010,
            Thisproblem,sometimesalsocalledtheisochrone problem,                      Atanackovi´c et al., 2008, Jelicic and Petrovacki, 2009].
            is that of finding the shape of a frictionless wire lying in a             In our work we want to be able to consider arbitrarily
            vertical plane such that the time of a bead placed on the                 given boundary conditions y(a) = y and y(b) = y (and
                                                                                                                                   a                 b
            wire slides to the lowest point of the wire in the same time              isoperimetric constraints). For that we consider variational
            regardless of where the bead is placed. The cycloid is the                functionals with integrands involving not only a fractional
            isochrone as well as the brachistochrone curve: it gives the              derivative of order α ∈ (0,1) of the unknown function
            shortest time of slide and marks the born of the calculus                 y, but also the classical derivative y′. More precisely, we
            of variations.                                                            consider dependence of the integrands on the independent
                                                                                                                                      ′         α
                                                                                      variable t, unknown function y, and y + kaD y with k
            The study of fractional problems of the calculus of vari-                                                                           t
            ations and respective Euler-Lagrange type equations is                    a real parameter. As a consequence, one gets a proper
            a subject of current strong research due to its many                      extension of the classical calculus of variations, in the sense
            applications in science and engineering, including me-                    that the classical theory is recovered with the particular
            chanics, chemistry, biology, economics, and control the-                  situation k = 0. We remark that this is not the case with
            ory. In 1996-1997 Riewe obtained a version of the Euler–                  all the previous literature on the fractional variational
            Lagrange equations for fractional variational problems                    calculus, where the classical theory is not included as a
            combining the conservative and nonconservative cases                      particular case and only as a limit, when α → 1.
            [Riewe, 1996, 1997]. Since then, numerous works on the                    The text is organized as follows. In Section 2 we briefly
            fractional calculus of variations, fractional optimal control             recall the necessary definitions and properties of the frac-
            ⋆                                                                         tional calculus in the sense of Riemann-Liouville. Our
              This work is part of the first author’s PhD project, which is carried    results are stated, proved, and illustrated through an ex-
            out at the University of Aveiro under the Doctoral Programme              ample, in Section 3. We end with Section 4 of conclusion.
            Mathematics and Applications of Universities of Aveiro and Minho.
                            2. PRELIMINARIES                           hasanextremum.Weassumethatkisafixedrealnumber,
                                                                       F ∈ C2([a,b] × R2;R), and ∂ F (the partial derivative
                                                                                                       3
          In this section some basic definitions and properties of      of F(·,·,·) with respect to its third argument) has a
          fractional calculus are presented. For more on the subject   continuous right Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of
          werefer the reader to the books [Kilbas et al., 2006, Miller order α.
          and Ross, 1993, Podlubny, 1999].                             Definition 5. A function y ∈ C1[a,b] that satisfies the
          Definition 1. (Left and right Riemann-Liouville derivatives). given boundary conditions (3) is said to be admissible for
                                                                α      problem (2)-(3).
          Let f be a function defined on [a,b]. The operator aD ,
                                       Z                        t
                              1           t
                  α                   n          n−α−1                                                                          α
                D f(t) =            D     (t − τ)      f(τ)dτ ,        For simplicity of notation we introduce the operator [y]
               a t        Γ(n−α)                                       defined by                                                k
                                         a
          is called the left Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative of              α               ′         α
                                                                                  [y] (t) = (t,y(t),y (t) + kaD y(t)) .
          order α, and the operator Dα,                                              k                         t
                                     t b                               With this notation we can write (2) simply as
                 α           −1      nZ b        n−α−1                                           Z b
               tD f(t) =           D      (τ −t)       f(τ)dτ ,                                          α
                 b        Γ(n−α)                                                         J(y) =      F[y] (t)dt.
                                        t                                                                k
          is called the right Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative                             a
          of order α, where α ∈ R+ is the order of the derivatives     Theorem 6. (The fractional Euler-Lagrange equation). Ify
          and the integer number n is such that n−1 ≤ α < n.           is an extremizer (minimizer or maximizer) of problem (2)-
          Definition 2. (Mittag-Leffler function). Let α,β > 0. The       (3), then y satisfies the Euler-Lagrange equation
          Mittag-Leffler function is defined by                                     α      d        α          α       α
                                                                          ∂ F[y] (t)−     ∂ F[y] (t)+k D ∂ F[y] (t) = 0        (4)
                                                                           2     k      dt 3     k       t  b 3     k
                                     ∞        k
                          E (z)=X            z      .                  for all t ∈ [a,b].
                            α,β          Γ(αk+β)
                                     k=0                               Proof. Suppose that y is a solution of (2)-(3). Note
          Theorem 3. (Integration by parts). If f,g and the frac-      that admissible functions yˆ can be written in the form
                               α         α
          tional derivatives aD g and tD f are continuous at every                                    1
                               t         b                             yˆ(t) = y(t)+ǫη(t), where η ∈ C [a,b], η(a) = η(b) = 0, and
          point t ∈ [a,b], then                                        ǫ ∈ R. Let J(ǫ) = RbF(t,y(t) + ǫη(t), d (y(t)+ǫη(t)) +
                    Z b        α         Z b       α                        α               a           α       dt
                        f(t) D g(t)dt =     g(t) D f(t)dt        (1)   kaDt (y(t)+ǫη(t)))dt. Since aDt is a linear operator, we
                            a t                 t  b                   know that
                     a                    a
          for any 0 < α < 1.                                                       α                    α          α
                                                                                 D (y(t)+ǫη(t)) = D y(t)+ǫ D η(t).
                                                                                a t                 a   t        a t
          Remark 4. If f(a) 6= 0, then   Dαf(t)|    =∞.Similarly,
                               α        a t     t=a                    Onthe other hand,             
          if f(b) 6= 0, then tDb f(t)|   = ∞. Thus, if f possesses                  Z b             
                                     t=b                                  dJ            d           
          continuous left and right Riemann-Liouville fractional                 =        F[yˆ]α(t)dt
                                                                                              k     
          derivatives at every point t ∈ [a,b], then f(a) = f(b) = 0.      dǫ ǫ=0     a dǫ           
                                                         b                           Z                ǫ=0
          This explains why the usual term f(t)g(t)|       does not                    b
                                                         a                                      α                  α   dη(t)   (5)
          appear on the right-hand side of (1).                                   =      ∂ F[y] (t)·η(t)+∂ F[y] (t)
                                                                                          2     k            3     k    dt
                                                                                      a                          
                             3. MAIN RESULTS                                                         α      α
                                                                                           +k∂ F[y] (t) D η(t) dt.
                                                                                                3    k   a t
          Following [Jelicic and Petrovacki, 2009], we prove opti-     Using integration by parts we get
          mality conditions of Euler-Lagrange type for variational              Z b     dη            b   Z b   d
                                                                                    ∂ F    dt = ∂ Fη| −      (η   ∂ F)dt       (6)
          problems containing classical and fractional derivatives                   3  dt       3    a         dt 3
          simultaneously. In Section 3.1 the fundamental variational             a                         a
                                                                       and           Z                 Z
          problem is considered, while in Section 3.2 we study the                     b                 b
                                                                                               α
          isoperimetric problem. Our results cover fractional vari-                k     ∂ F D ηdt =      η D ∂ Fdt.           (7)
                                                                                          3 a t             t b 3
          ational problems subject to arbitrarily given boundary                      a                 a
          conditions. This is in contrast with [Agrawal, 2002, 2008,   Substituting (6) and (7) into (5), and having in mind that
          Agrawal and Baleanu, 2007, Baleanu et al., 2009], where      η(a) = η(b) = 0, it follows that
          the necessary optimality conditions are valid for appropri-               Z b    
                                                                           dJ                      α       d       α
          ate zero valued boundary conditions (cf. Remark 4). For a              =     η(t) ∂ F[y] (t)−      ∂ F[y] (t)
                                                                           dǫ                 2    k      dt 3     k
          discussion on this matter see [Almeida and Torres, 2010,            ǫ=0     a                                    
          Atanackovi´c et al., 2008, Jelicic and Petrovacki, 2009].                                            α       α
                                                                                                         +k D ∂ F[y] (t) dt.
                                                                                                             t b  3    k
                                                                                                                      dJ
          3.1 The Euler-Lagrange equation                              Anecessary optimality condition is given by dǫ       =0.
                                                                       Hence,                                            ǫ=0
          Let 0 < α < 1. Consider the following problem: find a            Z b                   d
          function y ∈ C1[a,b] for which the functional                                   α               α
                                                                              η(t) ∂ F[y] (t)−     ∂ F[y] (t)
                          Z                                                         2     k      dt 3     k
                             b                                             a                                        
                                         ′          α                                                   α       α
                  J(y) =      F(t,y(t),y (t) +kaD y(t))dt        (2)                              +k D ∂ F[y] (t) dt = 0. (8)
                                                    t                                                 t b  3    k
                           a
          subject to given boundary conditions                         We obtain (4) applying the fundamental lemma of the
                            y(a) = y ,   y(b) = y ,              (3)   calculus of variations to (8).
                                    a            b
          Remark 7. Note that for k = 0 our necessary optimality        By the implicit function theorem, there exists a function
          condition (4) reduces to the classical Euler-Lagrange equa-   ǫ (·) defined in a neighborhood of (0,0) such that
          tion [Gelfand and Fomin, 1963, van Brunt, 2004].               2
                                                                                              ˆ
                                                                                              I(ǫ ,ǫ (ǫ )) = 0.
                                                                                                 1  2  1
          3.2 The fractional isoperimetric problem                            ˆ
                                                                        Let J(ǫ ,ǫ ) = J(yˆ). Then, by the Lagrange multiplier
                                                                                1  2
                                                                        rule, there exists a real λ such that
          As before, let 0 < α < 1. We now consider the problem of                          ˆ          ˆ
          extremizing a functional                                                       ∇(J(0,0)−λI(0,0)) = 0.
                           Z b           ′          α                   Because         Z                                
                  J(y) =      F(t,y(t),y (t) +kaD y(t))dt         (9)           ˆ         b
                                                    t                         ∂J      =     η   ∂ F − d ∂ F +k Dα∂ F dt
                            a                                                                1   2         3      t b  3
                                                                             ∂ǫ                        dt
          in the class y ∈ C1[a,b] when subject to given boundary               1 (0,0)   a
          conditions                                                    and
                            y(a) = y ,   y(b) = y ,              (10)                   Z                                
                                    a             b                            ˆ          b
          and an isoperimetric constraint                                    ∂I                        d            α
                                                                                     =     η    ∂ G− ∂ G+kD ∂ G dt,
                      Z                                                      ∂ǫ             1    2     dt 3       t b  3
                        b                                                      1 (0,0)    a
                                    ′          α
              I(y) =      G(t,y(t),y (t) + kaD y(t))dt = ξ.      (11)
                                               t                        one has
                       a                                                   Z     "                           
          We assume that k and ξ are fixed real numbers, F,G ∈                 b             d
          C2([a,b]×R2;R), and ∂ F and ∂ G have continuous right                η    ∂ F −     ∂ F +k Dα∂ F
                                  3         3                                   1    2     dt 3       t  b 3
          Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives of order α.               a                                           #
          Definition 8. A function y ∈ C1[a,b] that satisfies the                                     d            α    
                                                                                       −λ ∂ G− ∂ G+kD ∂ G dt=0.
          given boundary conditions (10) and isoperimetric con-                               2     dt 3       t  b 3
          straint (11) is said to be admissible for problem (9)-(11).
                                                                        Since η is an arbitrary function, (12) follows from the
          Definition 9. An admissible function y is an extremal for              1
          I if it satisfies the fractional Euler-Lagrange equation       fundamental lemma of the calculus of variations.
                     α       d       α          α       α
              ∂ G[y] (t)−      ∂ G[y] (t)+k D ∂ G[y] (t) = 0
                2    k      dt 3     k        t b  3    k               3.3 An example
          for all t ∈ [a,b].                                            Let α ∈ (0,1) and k,ξ ∈ R. Consider the following
          The next theorem gives a necessary optimality condition       fractional isoperimetric problem:
          for the fractional isoperimetric problem (9)-(11).                             Z 1   ′       α 2
                                                                                 J(y) =      (y +k0D y) dt−→min
          Theorem 10. Let y be an extremizer to the functional                                         t
          (9) subject to the boundary conditions (10) and the                              0Z
                                                                                              1
          isoperimetric constraint (11). If y is not an extremal for I,                           ′       α                    (14)
                                                                                    I(y) =      (y +k0D y)dt=ξ
          then there exists a constant λ such that                                                        t
                                                                                             0
                   α      d        α           α       α                                     Z 1                   1−α
            ∂ H[y] (t)−     ∂ H[y] (t)+k D ∂ H[y] (t) = 0 (12)
             2     k          3    k        t  b 3     k                   y(0) = 0, y(1) =     E        −k(1−τ)         ξdτ.
                          dt                                                                  0   1−α,1
          for all t ∈ [a,b], where H(t,y,v) = F(t,y,v) − λG(t,y,v).     In this case the augmented Lagrangian H of Theorem 10
          Proof. We introduce the two parameter family                  is given by H(t,y,v) = v2 −λv. One can easily check that
                             yˆ = y + ǫ η +ǫ η ,                 (13)                     Z t                  1−α
                                       1 1    2 2                                  y(t) =    E        −k(t−τ)         ξdτ      (15)
          in which η and η are such that η ,η ∈ C1[a,b] and they                           0   1−α,1
                     1      2                1  2
          have continuous left and right fractional derivatives. We        • is not an extremal for I;
          also require that                                                            ′       α
                                                                           • satisfies y +k0D y = ξ (see, e.g., [Kilbas et al., 2006,
                      η (a) = η (b) = 0 = η (a) = η (b).                                       t
                       1        1           2        2                       p. 297, Theorem 5.5]).
          First we need to show that in the family (13) there are       Moreover, (15) satisfies (12) for λ = 2ξ, i.e.,
          curves such that yˆ satisfies (11). Substituting y by yˆ in
          (11), I(yˆ) becomes a function of two parameters ǫ ,ǫ .             d      ′       α
                                                                1  2       − (2(y +k0D y)−2ξ)
          Let                                                                 dt             t
                              Z b                                                                   α      ′       α
                                          ′       α                                           +ktD (2(y +k0D y)−2ξ)=0.
                   ˆ                                                                                1              t
                   I(ǫ ,ǫ ) =     G(t,yˆ,yˆ + k D yˆ)dt − ξ.
                      1  2                     a t                      Weconclude that (15) is the extremal for problem (14).
                 ˆ              a
          Then, I(0,0) = 0 and                                          Example 11. Choose k = 0. In this case the isoperimetric
                         Z                                
                 ˆ          b                                          constraint is trivially satisfied, (14) is reduced to the
               ∂I                        d            α                classical problem of the calculus of variations
                       =     η   ∂ G− ∂ G+kD ∂ G dt.
               ∂ǫ             2    2     dt 3      t  b 3                                     Z
                 2 (0,0)    a                                                                     1
          Since y is not an extremal for I, by the fundamental lemma                   J(y) =      (y′(t))2dt −→ min           (16)
          of the calculus of variations there is a function η such that                          0
                                                         2                                y(0) = 0,    y(1) = ξ,
                                   ˆ
                                  ∂I     6=0.                          and our general extremal (15) simplifies to the well-known
                                     
                                 ∂ǫ                                    minimizer y(t) = ξt of (16).
                                    2 (0,0)
          Example 12. When α → 1 the isoperimetric constraint is                           ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
          redundant with the boundary conditions, and the frac-
          tional problem (14) simplifies to the classical variational       The first author is supported by the Portuguese Founda-
          problem                                                          tion for Science and Technology (FCT) through the PhD
                                      2 Z 1 ′   2                          fellowship SFRH/BD/33865/2009; the second author by
                      J(y) = (k +1)     0 y (t) dt −→ min          (17)    FCT through the Center for Research and Development
                                                                           in Mathematics and Applications (CIDMA).
                           y(0) = 0,    y(1) =    ξ   .
                                                k+1
          Our fractional extremal (15) gives y(t) =      ξ t, which is                           REFERENCES
          exactly the minimizer of (17).                k+1                N. H. Abel. Euvres completes de Niels Henrik Abel. Chris-
          Example 13. Choose k = ξ = 1. When α → 0 one gets                  tiana: Imprimerie de Grondahl and Son; New York and
          from (14) the classical isoperimetric problem                      London: Johnson Reprint Corporation. VIII, 621 pp.,
                              Z 1                                            1965.
                      J(y) =      (y′(t) + y(t))2 dt −→ min                O. P. Agrawal. Formulation of Euler-Lagrange equations
                               0                                             for fractional variational problems. J. Math. Anal.
                             I(y) = Z 1y(t)dt = 1                  (18)      Appl., 272 (1): 368–379, 2002.
                                                   e                       O. P. Agrawal. A general finite element formulation for
                                       0            1                        fractional variational problems. J. Math. Anal. Appl.,
                            y(0) = 0,   y(1) = 1− .                          337 (1): 1–12, 2008.
                                                    e                      O.P.AgrawalandD.Baleanu.AHamiltonianformulation
          Ourextremal(15)isthenreducedtotheclassical extremal                and a direct numerical scheme for fractional optimal
          y(t) = 1 −e−t of (18).                                             control problems. J. Vib. Control, 13 (9-10): 1269–1281,
          Example 14. Choose k = 1 and α = 1. Then (14) gives                2007.
                                                   2                       R. Almeida and D. F. M. Torres. Calculus of variations
          the following fractional isoperimetric problem:                    withfractional derivatives and fractional integrals. Appl.
                            Z 1            
                                   ′     1   2                               Math. Lett., 22 (12): 1816–1820, 2009a.
                   J(y) =        y +0D2y       dt −→ min
                                         t                                 R. Almeida and D. F. M. Torres. H¨olderian variational
                             0Z
                                 1         1                               problems subject to integral constraints. J. Math. Anal.
                       I(y) =       y′ +0D2y dt = ξ                (19)      Appl., 359 (2): 674–681, 2009b.
                                            t
                                0                                        R.AlmeidaandD.F.M.Torres.Leitmann’sdirectmethod
                                                        2                    for fractional optimization problems. Appl. Math. Com-
                y(0) = 0,   y(1) = −ξ 1−erfc(1)+ √π ,                        put., in press, 2010. DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2010.03.085
          where erfc is the complementary error function. The ex-          R. Almeida, R. A. C. Ferreira, and D. F. M. Torres.
          tremal (15) for the particular fractional problem (19) is          Isoperimetric problems of the calculus of variations with
                                                    √                      fractional derivatives. Submitted, 2009.
                                       t     √      2 t                    T.M.Atanackovi´c, S. Konjik, and S. Pilipovi´c. Variational
                      y(t) = −ξ   1−eerfc( t)+ √           .                 problems with fractional derivatives: Euler-Lagrange
                                                      π                      equations. J. Phys. A, 41 (9): 095201, 12, 2008.
                                                                           D. Baleanu. New applications of fractional variational
                               4. CONCLUSION                                 principles. Rep. Math. Phys., 61 (2): 199–206, 2008.
                                                                           D. Baleanu and J. I. Trujillo. A new method of finding
          Fractional variational calculus provides a very useful             the fractional Euler-Lagrange and Hamilton equations
          framework to deal with nonlocal dynamics in Mechanics              within Caputo fractional derivatives. Communications
          and Physics [Baleanu and Trujillo, 2010]. Motivated by             in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 15 (5):
          the results and insights of [Almeida et al., 2009, Almeida         1111 – 1115, 2010.
          and Torres, 2009a, Jelicic and Petrovacki, 2009], in this        D. Baleanu, O. Defterli, and O. P. Agrawal. A central dif-
          paper we generalize previous fractional Euler-Lagrange             ference numerical scheme for fractional optimal control
          equations by proving optimality conditions for fractional          problems. J. Vib. Control, 15 (4): 583–597, 2009.
          problems of the calculus of variations where the highest         V. Bl˚asj¨o. The isoperimetric problem. Amer. Math.
          derivative in the Lagrangian is of integer order. This ap-         Monthly, 112 (6): 526–566, 2005.
          proach avoids difficulties with the given boundary condi-          J. P. Curtis. Complementary extremum principles for
          tions when in presence of Riemann–Liouville derivatives            isoperimetric optimization problems. Optim. Eng., 5 (4):
          [Jelicic and Petrovacki, 2009].                                    417–430, 2004.
                                                                           R. A. El-Nabulsi and D. F. M. Torres. Necessary opti-
          We focus our attention to problems subject to integral             mality conditions for fractional action-like integrals of
          constraints (fractional isoperimetric problems), which have        variational calculus with Riemann-Liouville derivatives
          recently found a broad class of important applications             of order (α,β). Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 30 (15): 1931–
          [Almeida and Torres, 2009b, Bl˚asj¨o, 2005, Curtis, 2004].         1939, 2007.
          For k = 0 our results are reduced to the classical ones          G. S. F. Frederico and D. F. M. Torres. A formulation
          [van Brunt, 2004]. This is in contrast with the standard           of Noether’s theorem for fractional problems of the
          approach to fractional variational calculus, where the             calculus of variations. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 334 (2):
          classical (integer-order) case is obtained only in the limit.      834–846, 2007.
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Calculus of variations with fractional and classical derivatives tatiana odzijewicz delm f m torres department mathematics university aveiro portugal e mail tatianao ua pt abstract wegiveaproperfractionalextensionoftheclassicalcalculus necessary optimality conditions euler lagrange type for variational problems containing both are proved the fundamental problem mixed integer order as well isoperimetric considered keywords analysis riemann liouville operators dierentiation introduction anditsapplications have been written see g says that rst person who solved references therein study was dido queen carthage oered much land she could surround skin a in pioneering paper others bull s is nowadays part followed under hypothesis admissible functions y generalization dier continuous left right on ential allowing to dene inte closed interval by considering grals real or complex application whole then necessarily consider belongs niels henrik abel ing goes back applied b this fact solution an i...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.