jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Calculus Pdf 169015 | Spivakcomments


 139x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.05 MB       Source: www.math.toronto.edu


File: Calculus Pdf 169015 | Spivakcomments
dror bar natan classes 2004 05 math 157 analysis i comments on spivak s book web version http www math toronto edu drorbn classes 0405 157analysisi spivakcomments spivakcomments html no ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 25 Jan 2023 | 2 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
                 Dror Bar-Natan: Classes: 2004-05: Math 157 - Analysis I:
                                       Comments on Spivak’s Book
                                                          web version:
                 http://www.math.toronto.edu/˜drorbn/classes/0405/157AnalysisI/SpivakComments/SpivakComments.html
                    No book is perfect, and our excellent textbook is no exception. This page will grow to
                 be a list of typos and other mistakes (mostly very minor) in Spivak’s “Calculus” book (third
                 edition). If you ¯nd anything, please let me know (electronic means preferred!), and I’ll add
                 your report. At the end of the year I plan to send this page to Spivak.
                    I should have started this two years ago, when I ¯rst taught using this book. I guess the
                 few typos reported to me before October 2004 may be lost.
                    Theformatoftheentries below is: (page number; date added to this list (d/m/y); credit;
                 report).
                    • 49; 7/10/04; Gary Baumgartner; at the beginning of the third line of question 6,
                      “(x−xi)” should be “(x−xj)”.
                    • 171; 29/11/04; Roman Feiman and Jordan Myslik; on line 9, “cosx · x” should be
                      “cosx·cosx”.                                 √                   √
                    • 181; 8/11/04; Shay Fuchs; in problem 9, “− 3x” should be “− 3x”.
                    • 260; 14/12/04; Richard Michael; on line −9, a factor of n is missing in the formula for
                      U(f,Pn).
                    • 267; 14/12/04; Richard Michael; on line 9, “new function f” should be “new function
                      F”.
                    • 321; 18/10/04; Dror Bar-Natan; the treatment of the irrationality of π is horrible.
                      Should have been done after integration by parts, along the lines of
                      http://www.math.toronto.edu/˜drorbn/classes/0203/157AnalysisI/etc/PiIrrational.html.
                    • 350; 18/02/05; Keh-Harng Feng and Jordan Myslik; in exercise 7c, “sinhxcoshx”
                      should be “sinhxcoshy”.
                    • 370; 5/4/05; Jordan Myslik; in line 8, replace “dx = 1dx” with “dx = 1du”.
                                                                             u                 u
                    • 431; 7/03/05; Dror Bar-Natan; in exercise 16 part (d), replace f′(x) with f′(a).
                    • 614; 18/10/04; Yan, Hao; in the solution of 7(a), should be f(x) = (−A/B)x+(−C/B).
                    • 618; 10/11/04; Yan, Hao; in the solution of 1(v), “[1+√5]/2” should be “[−1+√5]/2”.
                    • 647; 5/4/05; Jordan Myslik; the solution to 8(iii) is c = (i + 1)a    (not (i + 1)a ).
                                                                             i          i+1              i
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Dror bar natan classes math analysis i comments on spivak s book web version http www toronto edu drorbn analysisi spivakcomments html no is perfect and our excellent textbook exception this page will grow to be a list of typos other mistakes mostly very minor in calculus third edition if you nd anything please let me know electronic means preferred ll add your report at the end year plan send should have started two years ago when rst taught using guess few reported before october may lost theformatoftheentries below number date added d m y credit gary baumgartner beginning line question x xi xj roman feiman jordan myslik cosx shay fuchs problem richard michael factor n missing formula for u f pn new function treatment irrationality horrible been done after integration by parts along lines etc piirrational keh harng feng exercise c sinhxcoshx sinhxcoshy replace dx with du part yan hao solution b v iii not...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.