297x Filetype PDF File size 0.68 MB Source: impa.br
✐ ✐“Clarke-Santoro˙New”
2012/8/24
page 1
✐ ✐
Holonomy groups in riemannian geometry
Andrew Clarke and Bianca Santoro 1
June 15, 2012
1The first author would like to acknowledge the support of FAPESP
(Processo 2011/07363-6) in the preparation of these notes. The second
author acknowledges the support of the PSC-CUNY (award number 64059-
00 42) and of the National Science Foundation under grant DMS 1007155.
✐ ✐ ✐ ✐
✐ ✐“Clarke-Santoro˙New”
2012/8/24
page 2
✐ ✐
✐ ✐ ✐ ✐
✐ ✐“Clarke-Santoro˙New”
2012/8/24
page 3
✐ ✐
Preface
These are the very unpretentious lecture notes for the minicourse
HolonomyGroupsinRiemanniangeometry,apartoftheXVIIBrazil-
ian School of Geometry, to be held at UFAM (Amazonas, Brazil), in
July of 2012. We have aimed at providing a first introduction to
the main general ideas on the study of the holonomy groups of a
Riemannian manifold.
The holonomy group is one of the fundamental analytical objects
that one can define on a riemannian manfold. It interacts with, and
contains information about a great number of geometric properties
of the manifold. Namely, the holonomy group detects the local re-
ducibility of the manifold, and also whether the metric is locally
symmetric.
Wehavestructured these notes to emphasize the principal bundle
formulation. This is done because it was felt that the symmetries of
a manifold, even pointwise, are best expressed in this way. We have
striven though to give constructions in two different ways, on vector
bundles and principal bundles, and also to stress the ways in which
these perspectives relate.
We plan to keep improving these notes, and the updates will be
available at
http://www.sci.ccny.cuny.edu/∼bsantoro/ and
http://www.ime.usp.br/∼clarke/en/
Meanwhile, we invite the reader to send suggestions, comments
and possible corrections to
bsantoro@ccny.cuny.edu or clarke@ime.usp.br
Disclaimer: Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommen-
dations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
✐ ✐ ✐ ✐
✐ ✐“Clarke-Santoro˙New”
2012/8/24
page 4
✐ ✐
✐ ✐ ✐ ✐
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.