145x Filetype PDF File size 0.20 MB Source: www.atlantis-press.com
Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 379 1st Vocational Education International Conference (VEIC 2019) Power Influence of Leadership on Lecturer Performance for University Quality Management Sri Handayani, DYP Sugiharto, Joko Sutarto, Kardoyo Doctoral Program of Education Management Departement, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Semarang, Indonesia handayani@mail.unnes.ac.id, dypsugiharto@mail.unnes.ac.id, jokotarto@mail.unnes.ac.id, kardoyo@mail.unnes.ac.id Keywords: Job Satisfaction, Leadership, Lecturer, Path Goal. Abstract: This review article give analysis about the relationship between path goal leadersip and job satisfaction of lecturers at the 4.0 revolution era. The leader uses the leadership pattern of the goal path in managing the lecturer. The job satisfaction of lecturers depends on the leadership behaviour of the college. There is a significant correlation between the pattern of leadership path goals with lecturer job satisfaction in the form of: support, participatory, achievement-oriented leaders, assignments, and effective supervision. There is also a correlation between the demographic characteristics of lecturers (age, gender, educational qualifications, and years of service) with job satisfaction of lecturers. The correlation between situational factors such as self-control, completion of tasks assigned, ability to accept pressure, and salary with lecturer job satisfaction is significant. University quality management that impact from the analysis about path goal leadership and lecturer satisfaction. Quality management in university is an important thing that must be reviewed and implemented so that the university can maintain its existence. 1 INTRODUCTION Effectivennes and significant Turn Over Intention The 4.0 revolution era produced growth and S.H. Malik Relationship There are competition in the success of a tertiary institution . (2013) between Leader relationship between So that there is a need for management and Behaviors and leadership with job Employees’s Job satisfaction perspective of leadership patterns so that the work Satisfaction : A environment is a university. Because with effective Path Goal management and leadership will create job Approach satisfaction lecturers so that lecturer performance Jens Instrumental These Result will increase. In theories about leadership has been Rowold Leadership : demonstrate that recommended antecedents for employee job (2014) Extending the potentially, satisfaction (Ronald, 2014). The state of the art of Transformational- instrumental this article can be seen in Table 1. Transactional leadership is valid Leadership extension to the Paradigm. transformational and Table 1. State of the art transactional Researcher Titlle Result leadership paradigm. S.H. Malik A Study of There is an inverse Busse Comprehensive Historical (2012) Relationship relationship between Ronald Leadership Riview- foundation of between Leader job expentancy with (2014) Literature, Theories leadership theories Behaviors and leadership and Research and then elucidates Subordinate Job modern leadership Expectancies : A Lecturers are elements of education that occupy a Path Goal strategic position to create quality education and can Approach improve the ranking of the colleges they support Marva L The Impact of Path Study’s findings for (Dewan and Dewan, 2010). The active participation Dixon and Goal Leadership organizational of lecturers has a great influence on national L.K Hart Styles on Work leaders and the fields development(Dixon and Hart, 2010). For this reason, (2010) Group of workers are Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Atlantis Press SARL. This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). 46 Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 379 in order to improve performance in tertiary directing, supervising and regulating the institutions, effective job satisfaction of lecturers performance of its employees to work according to needs to be considered by university leaders existing rules, having supportive behavior that is the (Antonakis and House, 2013). Lecturers are leader has a plan, paying attention to employee professionals who have the principles of talent, needs and assuming employees are partners work, interest, calling, idealism, commitment to the having participatory behavior that is consulting and leadership to improve the quality of education, have discussing problems with employees before making academic qualifications that are linear in their fields, a decision, having achievement-oriented behavior competencies that are appropriate to the field, where the leader has high-quality performance and responsible and professional in carrying out tasks, improving performance in the future (Dixon and earning salaries according to achievements work, Hart, 2010). In relation to the path goal theory, have the opportunity to develop professionalism in a Gibson argues that the use of the path goal sustainable manner, guarantee legal protection, take leadership style has implications for effective shelter in an authorized professional organization behavior. Such behavior can be accepted by with lecturer professionalism duties (Forceville, employees and is considered as motivation 2011). (Famakin and Abisuga, 2016). In higher education Improved lecturer achievement is influenced by leaders with different leadership styles will affect the the style of leadership (Grace, 2011). Some research satisfaction of lecturers in the institution. According on leadership has been carried out and more on to Rowold satisfaction is defined as attitude, transformational and transactional leadership styles meaning satisfaction is an evaluative statement while with the development and revolution in the whether it has a positive or negative impact on world of education which has implications for the individuals, groups or certain events Satisfaction can effectiveness of higher education needs to be be a reaction to the cognitive, affective and reviewed in order to be recommended as an evaluative nature of an event (Landrum and Daily, antecedent for leadership from other institutions 2012). According to Kromhout and Forceville, job (Kromhout and Forceville, 2013). Some opinions satisfaction is a person's perspective both good and regarding the definition of leadership include that if bad of a job (Kromhout and Forceville, 2013). leadership is an activity influencing a person or Satisfaction is an individual's general attitude group in order to achieve the desired goals and towards his job (Forceville, 2011). Aspects of job objectives (Malik, 2013). Leadership is the influence satisfaction include locus of control, abilities, tasks of the relationship between leaders and employees to assigned, roles in institutions, stress levels when make a change in achieving common goals carrying out tasks, the need for achievement (Famakin and Abisuga, 2016). Experts divide (promotion), salary, co- workers (Kromhout and leadership into four categories, among others based Forceville, 2013). Job satisfaction can also be felt on: nature, behavior, contingency and good or bad because different demographic factors transformational (Hernandez et al., 2011). Other include age, gender, educational qualifications, long experts divide leadership into three eras, the era of the service term (Landrum and Daily, 2012). From nature, the era of behavior and the era of the background that has been described, the purpose contingency. All leadership styles have advantages of this article riview is a novelty in the form of the and disadvantages depending on the situation and application of leadership path goals with the conditions encountered (Vandegrift and Matusitz, satisfaction of lecturers at University. 2011). Power influence approach is related to participative leadership where the division of power 2 ANALYSIS and empowerment of its employees (Silverthorne, 2001). The appropriate leadership style for this Analysis framework for thinking flow in this article participatory approach is the path goal leadership riview can be seen in figure 1. theory. This path goal was developed by House which states that leaders have a role in improving the performance of their employees (Malik, 2012). The goal theory path in this study is certainly recommended for application to tertiary institutions (Malik et al., 2014). House identifies four leadership behaviors with style path goals including: having directive behavior that shows dominance in 47 Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 379 self-control completion of tasks assigned ability to accept pressure salary Situation Factor Support Participatory Path Goal Lecturer achievement-oriented leaders Leadership Satisfaction assignments effective supervision Characteristic of Demographic Age gender educational qualifications years of service Figure 1. Research framework Figure 1 is a framework that writer want to accept the application of path goal leadership. The analyze in which they want to know whether the number of masters that is greater than the doctor leadership goal path applied at University has a causes the leader to be more supportive and motivate positive impact or a negative impact on the the lecturer to improve performance. The existence performance satisfaction of lecturers. The writer of motivation from the leadership resulted in wants to know also the extent to which the situation increased lecturer performance so that achievement factor and demographic characteristics affect is better. The satisfaction of lecturers in this master's lecturer performance satisfaction. qualification is influenced by the assignment of tasks Aspects of the leadership goal path analyzed and motivation in achievement. Path goal leadership include support, participation, achievement-oriented has an achievement oriented character so that the leaders, assignment of tasks, and effective leader will encourage lecturers who are still master supervision (Polston-Murdoch, 2013). While the qualifications to be able to achieve achievement situation factor is self control which means the (Grace, 2011). condition with good emotional intelligence, the The level of maturity and emotional intelligence ability to accept assignments, the role and level of possessed by lecturers with an older age. The stress that can be experienced, the need for emotional level is more awake so that it can accept achievement, and salary (Vecchio et al., 2008). leadership in any form. Emotional intelligence is Lecturers with male gender feel that the path directly proportional to age, so the older a person is, goal leadership has a good impact, even though the higher emotional intelligence, so that he can lecturers with female gender have the same opinion. more wisely accept the pattern of leadership in path This is in line with research conducted by Alanazi goals. Lecturers of this age have good locus of which states that the assessment of the merits of the control, lecturers will be wiser in making decisions behavior of leaders is influenced by the gender of and carrying out their activities (Famakin and their subordinates. This also affects the task and the Abisuga, 2016). Older lecturers have knowledge and level of stress received by the lecturer (Alanazi et experience about the work being done than younger al., 2013). Male lecturers will have the ability to lecturers. Based on seniority positions, lecturers with accept more and stronger assignments with pressure. old age can control the portion of work, more So they can work better so that lecturer satisfaction freedom in decision making and more social will also be faster achieved (Malik et al., 2014). recognition(Malik, 2013). Lecturers with master's qualifications can better 48 Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 379 The demographic characteristics of the lecturer so that the lecturer is in a safe and secure condition are also analyzed in which the sense of ownership of from fulfilling needs, this is the time when they do the institution and the role of lecturers who feel they not think selfishly for themselves, but rather the have helped raise the name of the tertiary institution advancement of higher education. make lecturers with long tenure can accept the leadership goal path. Support from lecturers will be 3 IMPLICATION given to their leaders. The leadership also invited lecturers to participate in making joint decisions in Good leadership and job satisfaction of lecturers order to achieve the vision and mission of higher have an impact on the quality of the university. So education. The long work period also has an impact that later management is needed to guarantee the on the welfare received (Famakin and Abisuga, quality of the university. The implication from this 2016). So that the satisfaction of lecturers can also object can be seen in figure 2. be felt because they have fought for the institution and got the appropriate results. The longer the working period of course the salary earned is greater Input Process Output Result University leadership Quality Management : Vision and Mission Path goal Quality Stakeholder’s of University Autonomy Satisfaction Accountability Accreditation Evaluation Lecturer Performance Demographic characteristic (age, gender, education, years of service) Figure 2. The Impact of Leadership and Lecturer Performance for University Quality Management Quality management is a means to maintain the services provided to the public as users of existence of universities in order to face intense educational services. competition. Management of good university quality University Quality Management contains quality, is supported by good leadership and performance of autonomi, acountability, accreditation, evaluation. outstanding lecturers. Pathgoal leadership is a University products and services are expected to visionary leadership pattern, leadership that is able meet the needs and expectations of users. The to formulate the vision and mission of the university quality of education is related to fulfillment desires and then is able to translate into clear policies and and expectations of education customers themselves, specific goals. Basically, education at universities is namely students, parents as well as the environment important in society, and stakeholders also demand and stakeholders. The concept of quality assurance universities to be able to provide quality graduates. is not just user-focused with regard to product and Education programs in universities must be able to service characteristics that meet user expectations, support the achievement of quality, relevant and but also includes characteristics and completeness internationally competitive education services. that show strengths compared to products and University quality is determined by the products and services from competitors. These advantages pertain 49
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.