239x Filetype PDF File size 1.31 MB Source: apps.dtic.mil
ARI Research Note 99-21
Feedback on 360 Degree Leader AZIMUTH Check Assessment
Conducted at Fort Clayton, Panama
Angela I. Karrasch
Kansas State University
Consortium Research Fellows Program
Stanley M. Halpin
U.S. Army Research Institute
Fort Leavenworth Research Unit
Stanley M. Halpin, Chief
March 1999
199904140 1 8
U.S. Army Research Institute
for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
P1IC qyALHT OliHgOTED 4
U.S. Army Research Institute
for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
A Directorate of the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command
EDGAR M. JOHNSON
Director
Technical review by
Robert E. Solick
NOTICES
DISTRIBUTION: This Research Note has been cleared for release to the Defense
Technical Information Center (DTIC) to comply with regulatory requirements. It has
been given no primary distribution other than to DTIC and will be available only through
DTIC or the National Technical Information Service (NTIS).
FINAL DISPOSITION: This Research Note may be destroyed when it is no longer
needed. Please do not return it to the U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral
and Social Sciences.
NOTE: The views, opinions, and findings in this Research Note are those of the
author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position,
policy, or decision unless so designated by other authorized documents.
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
1. REPORT DATE (dd-mm-yy) 2. REPORT TYPE 3. DATES COVERED (from... to)
March 1999 Final October 1998-March 1999
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5a. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBER
Feedback on 360 Degree Leader AZIMUTH Check Assessment
Conducted at Fort Clayton, Panama 5b. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
63007A
6. AUTHOR(S) 5c. PROJECT NUMBER
Angela I. Karrasch (Kansas State University) and Stanley M. Halpin A792
(U.S. ArmyResearch Institute) 5d. TASK NUMBER
1141
5e. WORK UNIT NUMBER
TAS
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
ATTN: TAPC-ARI-RK
5001 Eisenhower Avenue
Alexandria, VA 22333-5600
9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. MONITOR ACRONYM
U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences ARI
5001 Eisenhower Avenue
Alexandria, VA 22333-5600 11. MONITOR REPORT NUMBER
Research Note 99-21
12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited.
13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Angela I. Karrasch is a Consortium Research Fellow with the Fort Leavenworth Research Unit, U.S. Army Research Institute
14. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words):
This report documents military and civilian leaders' reactions to a multi-rater assessment of their leadership behaviors. The
80 targeted leaders were commissioned and non-commission military officers, and GS-9 to GS14 civilian leaders at Fort
Clayton, Panama. After completing the Leader Azimuth Check and receiving feedback, they were asked to complete a survey
designed to assess 1) perceptions of trust and the fairness in the multi-rater process, 2) reported understanding of the multi-
rater process, 3) beliefs about the accuracy and appropriateness of the sources of feedback and 4) self-efficacy and intentions
for change in leadership behaviors. An overview of the responses to the survey are recorded in this report. Subordinates were
overwhelmingly viewed as the most valuable source of feedback. Eighty three percent reported that they would use their
feedback to monitor and develop their leadership. Motivation to change leadership behavior was best predicted by the extent to
which leaders believed the feedback they received was new information. Trust in the confidentiality of the multi-rater process
was high, as was the reported understanding in the purpose and methods of the 360. Perceptions of fairness and satisfaction
were moderate to high. Perceptions of fairness and accuracy predicted satisfaction with the multi-rater process. Other
predictors are mentioned in the report. Implications and recommendations are provided.
15. SUBJECT TERMS
Leader Azimuth Check, multi-rater assessment, multi-rater process
SECURITY CLASSJRCATtQN OF 19. LIMITATION OF 20. NUMBER 21. RESPONSIBLE PERSON
16. REPORT 17. ABSTRACT 18. THIS PAGE ABSTRACT OF PAGES (Name and Telephone Number)
Unclassified Unclassified Unlimited 31 Angela I. Karrasch
Unclassified (913)684-9753
Feedback on a 360 degree Leader AZIMUTH Check assessment
conducted at Fort Clayton, Panama
Contents
Page
INTRODUCTION 1
METHODOLOGY '. 1
SUBORDINATE FEEDBACK MOST VALUABLE 2
MOTIVATION TO CHANGE 3
ACCEPTANCE OF MULTI-RATER PROCESS 4
IMPLICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5
APPENDICES
A. Leader AZIMUTH Check 6
B. Follow-up Survey 11
C. Table of Means and Correlations 14
ii
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.