238x Filetype PDF File size 0.16 MB Source: rohandrape.net
The Society of the Spectacle that have already been made in the sphere of
by Guy Debord production and in the consumption
implied by that production.
(film soundtrack)
Separation is itself an integral part of the
unity of this world, of a global social
practice split into reality and image. The
In societies dominated by modern social practice confronted by an
conditions of production, life is presented autonomous spectacle is at the same time
as an immense accumulation of spectacles. the real totality which contains that
Everything that was directly lived has spectacle. But the split within this totality
receded into a representation. mutilates it to the point that the spectacle
seems to be its goal.
The images detached from every aspect of
life merge into a common stream in which In a world that is really upside down, the
the unity of that life can no longer be true is a moment of the false.
recovered. Fragmented views of reality
regroup themselves into a new unity as a Considered in its own terms, the spectacle
separate pseudoworld that can only be is an affirmation of appearances and an
looked at. The specialization of images of identification of all human social life with
the world evolves into a world of appearances. But a critique that grasps the
autonomized images where even the spectacle’s essential character reveals it to
deceivers are deceived. The spectacle is a be a visible negation of life — a negation
concrete inversion of life, an autonomous that has taken on a visible form.
movement of the nonliving.
The spectacle presents itself as a vast
The spectacle presents itself inaccessible reality that can never be
simultaneously as society itself, as a part questioned. Its sole message is: “What
of society, and as a means of unification. As appears is good; what is good appears.”
a part of society, it is the focal point of all The passive acceptance it demands is
vision and all consciousness. But due to already effectively imposed by its
the very fact that this sector is separate, it is monopoly of appearances, its manner of
in reality the domain of delusion and false appearing without allowing any reply.
consciousness: the unification it achieves is
nothing but an official language of The spectacle is able to subject human
universal separation. beings to itself because the economy has
already totally subjugated them. It is
The spectacle is not a collection of images; nothing other than the economy
it is a social relation between people that is developing for itself. It is at once a faithful
mediated by images. reflection of the production of things and a
distorting objectification of the producers.
Understood in its totality, the spectacle is
both the result and the project of the When the real world is transformed into
dominant mode of production. It is not a mere images, mere images become real
mere decoration added to the real world. beings — dynamic figments that provide
It is the very heart of this real society’s the direct motivations for a hypnotic
unreality. In all of its particular behavior.
manifestations — news, propaganda,
advertising, entertainment — the spectacle As long as necessity is socially dreamed,
represents the dominant model of life. It is dreaming will remain a social necessity.
the omnipresent affirmation of the choices The spectacle is the bad dream of a
modern society in chains and ultimately forces that have escaped us display
expresses nothing more than its wish for themselves to us in all their power.
sleep. The spectacle is the guardian of that
sleep. Though separated from what they
produce, people nevertheless produce
The fact that the practical power of every detail of their world with ever-
modern society has detached itself from increasing power. They thus also find
that society and established an themselves increasingly separated from
independent realm in the spectacle can be that world. The closer their life comes to
explained only by the additional fact that being their own creation, the more they
that powerful practice continued to lack are excluded from that life.
cohesion and had remained in
contradiction with itself. The spectacle is capital accumulated to the
point that it becomes images.
The root of the spectacle is that oldest of
all social specializations, the specialization Critical theory must communicate itself in
of power. The spectacle plays the its own language — the language of
specialized role of speaking in the name of contradiction, which must be dialectical in
all the other activities. It is hierarchical both form and content. It must be an all-
society’s ambassador to itself, delivering inclusive critique, and it must be
its official messages at a court where no grounded in history. It is not a “zero
one else is allowed to speak. The most degree of writing,” but its reversal. It is
modern aspect of the spectacle is thus also not a negation of style, but the style of
the most archaic. negation.
The social separation reflected in the The very style of dialectical theory is a
spectacle is inseparable from the modern scandal and abomination to the prevailing
state — the product of the social division standards of language and to the
of labor that is both the chief instrument of sensibilities molded by those standards,
class rule and the concentrated expression because while it makes concrete use of
of all social divisions. existing concepts it simultaneously
recognizes their fluidity and their
In the spectacle, a part of the world inevitable destruction.
represents itself to the world and is superior
to it. The spectacle is simply the common This style, which includes a critique of
language of this separation. Spectators are itself, must express the domination of the
linked solely by their one-way relationship present critique over its entire past.
to the very center that keeps them isolated Dialectical theory’s mode of exposition
from each other. The spectacle thus reveals the negative spirit within it. “Truth
reunites the separated, but it reunites them is not like some finished product in which
only in their separateness. one can no longer find any trace of the tool
that made it.” This theoretical
Workers do not produce themselves, they consciousness of a movement whose
produce a power independent of traces must remain visible within it is
themselves. The success of this manifested by the reversal of established
production, the abundance it generates, is relationships between concepts and by the
experienced by the producers as an détournement of all the achievements of
abundance of dispossession. As their earlier critical efforts.
alienated products accumulate, all time
and space become foreign to them. The Ideas improve. The meaning of words
plays a role in that improvement.
Plagiarism is necessary. Progress depends one-way communication — are absolutely
on it. It sticks close to an author’s corrupted by their experience of contempt
phrasing, exploits his expressions, deletes and by the success of that contempt,
a false idea, replaces it with the right one. because they find their contempt
confirmed by their awareness of how truly
Détournement is the flexible language of contemptible spectators really are.
anti-ideology. It appears in
communication that knows it cannot claim In the spectacle’s basic practice of
to embody any definitive certainty. It is incorporating into itself all the fluid
language that cannot and need not be aspects of human activity so as to possess
confirmed by any previous or supracritical them in a congealed form, and of inverting
reference. On the contrary, its own living values into purely abstract values,
internal coherence and practical we recognize our old enemy the commodity,
effectiveness are what validate the which seems at first glance so trivial and
previous kernels of truth it has brought obvious, yet which is actually so complex
back into play. Détournement has and full of metaphysical subtleties.
grounded its cause on nothing but its own
truth as present critique. The fetishism of the commodity — the
domination of society by “intangible as
The element of overt détournement in well as tangible things” — attains its
formulated theory refutes any notion that ultimate fulfillment in the spectacle, where
such theory is durably autonomous. By the real world is replaced by a selection of
introducing into the theoretical domain images which are projected above it, yet
the same type of violent subversion that which at the same time succeed in making
disrupts and overthrows every existing themselves regarded as the epitome of
order, détournement serves as a reminder reality.
that theory is nothing in itself, that it can
realize itself only through historical action The world at once present and absent that
and through the historical correction that is the spectacle holds up to view is the world
its true allegiance. of the commodity dominating all living
experience. The world of the commodity is
The point is to actually participate in the thus shown for what it is, because its
community of dialogue and the game with development is identical to people’s
time that up till now have merely been estrangement from each other and from
represented by poetic and artistic works. everything they produce.
When art becomes independent and paints As long as the economy’s role as material
its world in dazzling colors, a moment of basis of social life was neither noticed nor
life has grown old. Such a moment cannot understood (remaining unknown
be rejuvenated by dazzling colors, it can precisely because it was so familiar), the
only be evoked in memory. The greatness commodity’s dominion over the economy
of art only emerges at the dusk of life. was exerted in a covert manner. In
societies where actual commodities were
The official thought of the social few and far between, money was the
organization of appearances is itself apparent master, serving as
obscured by the generalized plenipotentiary representative of the
subcommunication that it has to defend. It greater power that remained unknown.
cannot understand that conflict is at the With the Industrial Revolution’s
origin of everything in its world. The manufactural division of labor and mass
specialists of spectacular power — a production for a global market, the
power that is absolute within its realm of commodity finally became fully visible as
a power that was colonizing all social life. It spreads to the ends of the earth in the
was at that point that political economy form of tangible objects. The entire
established itself as the dominant science, expanse of society is its portrait.
and as the science of domination.
The spectacle, like modern society itself, is
The spectacle is a permanent opium war at once united and divided. The unity of
designed to force people to equate goods each is based on violent divisions. But
with commodities and to equate when this contradiction emerges in the
satisfaction with a survival that expands spectacle, it is itself contradicted by a
according to its own laws. Consumable reversal of its meaning: the division it
survival must constantly expand because presents is unitary, while the unity it
it never ceases to include privation. If presents is divided.
augmented survival never comes to a
resolution, if there is no point where it Although the struggles between different
might stop expanding, this is because it is powers for control of the same socio-
itself stuck in the realm of privation. It economic system are officially presented
may gild poverty, but it cannot transcend as irreconcilable antagonisms, they
it. actually reflect that system’s fundamental
unity, both internationally and within
Exchange value could arise only as a each nation.
representative of use value, but the victory
it eventually won with its own weapons The sham spectacular struggles between
created the conditions for its own rival forms of separate power are at the
autonomous power. By mobilizing all same time real, in that they express the
human use value and monopolizing its system’s uneven and conflictual
fulfillment, exchange value ultimately development and the more or less
succeeded in controlling use. Usefulness contradictory interests of the classes or
has come to be seen purely in terms of sections of classes that accept that system
exchange value, and is now completely at and strive to carve out a role for
its mercy. Starting out like a condottiere in themselves within it. By invoking any
the service of use value, exchange value number of different criteria, the spectacle
has ended up waging the war for its own can present these oppositions as totally
sake. distinct social systems. But in reality they
are nothing but particular sectors whose
Use value was formerly understood as an fundamental essence lies in the global
implicit aspect of exchange value. Now, system that contains them, the single
however, within the upside-down world movement that has turned the whole
of the spectacle, it must be explicitly planet into its field of operation:
proclaimed, both because its actual reality capitalism.
has been eroded by the overdeveloped
commodity economy and because it serves Behind the glitter of spectacular
as a necessary pseudo-justification for a distractions, a tendency toward
counterfeit life. banalization dominates modern society the
world over, even where the more
With the achievement of economic advanced forms of commodity
abundance, the concentrated result of consumption have seemingly multiplied
social labor becomes visible, subjecting all the variety of roles and objects to choose
reality to the appearances that are now from. The vestiges of religion and of the
that labor’s primary product. Capital is no family (the latter is still the primary
longer the invisible center governing the mechanism for transferring class power
production process; as it accumulates, it from one generation to the next), along
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.