126x Filetype PDF File size 0.07 MB Source: physics.bu.edu
11/12/2010 (Fri) Rotational Kinetic Energy Energy associated with rotation is given by an equation analogous to that for straight-line motion. 1 2 For an object that is moving but not rotating: Km= v Rotational Kinetic Energy 2 For an object that is rotating only: 1 2 KI= ω 2 For an object that is rolling, i.e., translating and rotating simultaneously, the total kinetic energy of such an object is: 11 22 Km=+vIω 22 1 2 Racing Shapes - Revisited Racing Shapes - Revisited Question: Which shape will have the biggest velocity after We have three objects, a solid disk, a ring, and a solid rolling down the slope? sphere, all with the same mass, M and radius, R. If Solution: Let’s use conservation of energy to analyze the race we release them from rest at the top of an incline, between two objects that roll without slipping down the ramp. which object will win the race? Assume the objects Let’s analyze a generic object with a mass M, radius R, and a roll down the ramp without slipping. rotational inertia of: 2 Ic= MR 1. The sphere Start with the usual five-term energy conservation equation. 2. The ring UK+ +=W U+K 3. The disk iincff 4. It’s a three-way tie Eliminate the terms, K and U that are zero, we have U = K i f i f 5. Can't tell - it depends on mass and/or radius. Insert the expressions for the U and K. i f 11 22 3 Mgh =+Mv Iω (1) 4 22 Racing Shapes - Revisited What does this tell us? 11 22 Mgh=+Mv Iω (1) 2 2 22 Mgh= ½Mv + ½cMv Because the object rolls without slipping, we can use ω = v Translational Rotational 2 R KE KE Ic= MR Next, substitute , where c = ½ for the disc, 2/5 for the sphere and 1 for the ring. 2gh 11v2 v = 1+c 22 Mgh=+Mv ()cMR 22R2 This result shows that the larger the value of c, the slower the Both the mass and the radius cancel out! object is, because a larger fraction of the potential energy is 11 directed toward the rotational kinetic energy, with less 22 gh=+v cv available for the translational kinetic energy and so the object 22 2gh moves (translates) more slowly. Solving for the speed at the bottom: v = Simulation 1+c 5 6 1 A Figure Skater - Revisit A Figure Skater - Revisit A spinning figure skater is an excellent example of angular Question: When the figure skater moves her arms in momentum conservation. The skater starts spinning with her closer to her body while she is spinning, what arms outstretched, and has a rotational inertia of Ii and an initial angular velocity of ω. When she moves her arms close happens to the skater’s rotational kinetic energy? i to her body, she spins faster. Her moment of inertia decreases, so her angular velocity must increase to keep the angular momentum constant. 1. It increases Conserving angular momentum: 2. It decreases 3. It must stay the same, because of conservation of vv energy LL= if vv IIω = ω ii ff Question: In this process, what happens to the skater's kinetic energy? 7 8 A Figure Skater - Revisit A ball rolling down a ramp 11 2 Question: A ball with mass M and radius R rolls without KI==ω Iωω× () iiiiii 22 slipping down a ramp from the top to the bottom (see 11 figure). We have found that a = gsinθ/(1 + c) and fs = 2 KI==ω Iωω× () Mgsinθ/(1/c + 1), where c = 2/5. Use conservation of f ff ff f 22 mechanical energy to find the non-conservative work done, W , on the ball when it reaches the bottom. Assume that The terms in brackets are the same, so the final kinetic nc energy is larger than the initial kinetic energy, because the ball is initially at rest and at a height h above ground. ω <ω . α if f s Mgsinθ Where does the extra kinetic energy come from? The skater does work on her arms in bringing them closer to h a her body, and that work shows up as an increase in kinetic Mg θ energy. 9 10 A ball rolling down a ramp A ball rolling down a ramp Solution: α To find v, we use α f Conservation of mechanical energy f f s Mgsinθ v2 = v2 + 2as s Mgsinθ gives E + W = E f i i nc f = 0 + 2[-gsinθ/(1+c)][-h/sinθ] Initial mechanical energy, h a = 2gh/(1+c) h a E = K + U = 0 + Mgh = Mgh Mg θ Mg θ i i i E + W = Mgh-W Final mechanical energy, i nc nc E = K + U E = (1+c)Mv2/2 = Mgh f f f f f = ½ mv2 + ½ Iω2 + ½ Mv2 + (c/2)Mv2 f 2 f f f = (1+c)Mv /2 E + W = E gives W = 0 f i nc f nc This shows that fs actually does no work on the ball! 11 12 2
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.