268x Filetype PDF File size 0.07 MB Source: physics.bu.edu
11/12/2010 (Fri)
Rotational Kinetic Energy
Energy associated with rotation is given by an equation
analogous to that for straight-line motion.
1 2
For an object that is moving but not rotating: Km= v
Rotational Kinetic Energy 2
For an object that is rotating only: 1 2
KI= ω
2
For an object that is rolling, i.e., translating and rotating
simultaneously, the total kinetic energy of such an object is:
11
22
Km=+vIω
22
1 2
Racing Shapes - Revisited Racing Shapes - Revisited
Question: Which shape will have the biggest velocity after
We have three objects, a solid disk, a ring, and a solid rolling down the slope?
sphere, all with the same mass, M and radius, R. If Solution: Let’s use conservation of energy to analyze the race
we release them from rest at the top of an incline, between two objects that roll without slipping down the ramp.
which object will win the race? Assume the objects Let’s analyze a generic object with a mass M, radius R, and a
roll down the ramp without slipping. rotational inertia of:
2
Ic= MR
1. The sphere Start with the usual five-term energy conservation equation.
2. The ring UK+ +=W U+K
3. The disk iincff
4. It’s a three-way tie Eliminate the terms, K and U that are zero, we have U = K
i f i f
5. Can't tell - it depends on mass and/or radius. Insert the expressions for the U and K.
i f
11
22
3 Mgh =+Mv Iω (1) 4
22
Racing Shapes - Revisited What does this tell us?
11
22
Mgh=+Mv Iω (1) 2 2
22 Mgh= ½Mv + ½cMv
Because the object rolls without slipping, we can use ω = v Translational Rotational
2 R KE KE
Ic= MR
Next, substitute , where c = ½ for the disc, 2/5 for
the sphere and 1 for the ring. 2gh
11v2 v = 1+c
22
Mgh=+Mv ()cMR
22R2
This result shows that the larger the value of c, the slower the
Both the mass and the radius cancel out! object is, because a larger fraction of the potential energy is
11 directed toward the rotational kinetic energy, with less
22
gh=+v cv available for the translational kinetic energy and so the object
22 2gh moves (translates) more slowly.
Solving for the speed at the bottom: v = Simulation
1+c 5 6
1
A Figure Skater - Revisit A Figure Skater - Revisit
A spinning figure skater is an excellent example of angular Question: When the figure skater moves her arms in
momentum conservation. The skater starts spinning with her closer to her body while she is spinning, what
arms outstretched, and has a rotational inertia of Ii and an
initial angular velocity of ω. When she moves her arms close happens to the skater’s rotational kinetic energy?
i
to her body, she spins faster. Her moment of inertia
decreases, so her angular velocity must increase to keep the
angular momentum constant. 1. It increases
Conserving angular momentum: 2. It decreases
3. It must stay the same, because of conservation of
vv energy
LL=
if
vv
IIω = ω
ii ff
Question: In this process, what happens to the skater's kinetic
energy?
7 8
A Figure Skater - Revisit A ball rolling down a ramp
11
2 Question: A ball with mass M and radius R rolls without
KI==ω Iωω×
()
iiiiii
22 slipping down a ramp from the top to the bottom (see
11 figure). We have found that a = gsinθ/(1 + c) and fs =
2
KI==ω Iωω×
() Mgsinθ/(1/c + 1), where c = 2/5. Use conservation of
f ff ff f
22 mechanical energy to find the non-conservative work done,
W , on the ball when it reaches the bottom. Assume that
The terms in brackets are the same, so the final kinetic nc
energy is larger than the initial kinetic energy, because the ball is initially at rest and at a height h above ground.
ω <ω . α
if
f
s Mgsinθ
Where does the extra kinetic energy come from?
The skater does work on her arms in bringing them closer to h a
her body, and that work shows up as an increase in kinetic Mg θ
energy. 9 10
A ball rolling down a ramp A ball rolling down a ramp
Solution: α To find v, we use α
f
Conservation of mechanical energy f f
s Mgsinθ v2 = v2 + 2as s Mgsinθ
gives E + W = E f i
i nc f = 0 + 2[-gsinθ/(1+c)][-h/sinθ]
Initial mechanical energy, h a = 2gh/(1+c) h a
E = K + U = 0 + Mgh = Mgh Mg θ Mg θ
i i i E + W = Mgh-W
Final mechanical energy, i nc nc
E = K + U E = (1+c)Mv2/2 = Mgh
f f f f f
= ½ mv2 + ½ Iω2 + ½ Mv2 + (c/2)Mv2
f 2 f f f
= (1+c)Mv /2 E + W = E gives W = 0
f i nc f nc
This shows that fs actually does no work on the ball!
11 12
2
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.