137x Filetype PDF File size 0.19 MB Source: us.corwin.com
22 Assessment With and for Students heword“assessment”comesfromtheLatinverb“assidere,”meaning“to Tsitwith.”Thiswordoriginimpliesthatinassessmenttheteachersitswith the learner and assessment is something teachers do with and for students rather than to students (Green, 1998). Formative assessment, in particular, is something teachers do with and for students. Teachers involve students with them in the assessment, thus students and teachers are partners, both sharing responsibility for learning. Formative assessment provides evidence for improving student learning. Indeed, to emphasize this function, it is often referred to as “assessment for learning.” Lorna Earl (2003) also uses the phrase “assessment as learning,” signaling the active role students play in the process. Amajorlandmark in the emergence of formative assessment was a syn- thesis of research findings from conducted by Paul Black and Dylan Wiliam in 1998.This review, and the more commonly read Phi Delta Kappan article in the same year, led to the widespread recognition of formative assessment as a powerful method for improving all students’ learning. They concluded that student learning gains triggered by formative assessment were “amongst the largest ever reported for educational interventions,” with the largest gains being realized by low achievers (1998b, p. 141).This was, and remains, pow- erful evidence for the value of formative assessment. Based on their review, Black and Wiliam determined that effective for- mative assessment occurs • whenteachers make adjustments to teaching and learning in response to assessment information; • 7 8 • Formative Assessment • when students receive feedback about their learning, with advice on what they can do to improve; and • when students are involved in the process through peer and self-assessment. Notice that Black and Wiliam refer to the “process” of formative assessment. Formative assessment is not a thing—it is not a single test given to students to see what they have learned for the purpose of grading, placement, or classi- fication. That is the function of summative assessments like an end-of-unit classroom test, the quarterly benchmark test, or the annual state test. Instead, formative assessment is a process that occurs during teaching and learning and involves both teachers and students in gathering information so they can take steps to keep learning moving forward to meet the learning goals. Lorrie Shepard, in her very influential 2000 presidential address to the American Educational Research Association, proposed a set of principles emerging from recent theories of learning as a framework to explain and integrate the findings from the diverse studies reviewed by Black and Wiliam. Among these were the following: • Intellectual abilities are socially and culturally developed. • Learners construct knowledge and understandings within a social context. • Intelligent thought involves “metacognition” or self-monitoring of learning and thinking. • New learning is shaped by prior knowledge and cultural perspectives. • Deep learning is principled and supports transfer. (Shepard, 2000, p. 8) She considered the kinds of assessment practices that are compatible with these principles, proposing fundamental changes in both the substance and purpose of assessments. In terms of substance, she argued that classroom assessments must be congruent with important learning goals, and they must directly connect to ongoing instruction. In terms of purpose, she called for fundamental changes in the perception of assessment functions.Assessments should be used to help students learn and to improve instruction, rather than functioning as “occasions for meting out rewards and punishment” (p. 10). Moreover, a reformed view of assessment should include not only clearly communicating expectations and intermediate steps to students, but also the requirement that students be actively involved in evaluating their own work (Shepard, 2000). Shepard’s presidential address, with its recommendations for a revolution in attitudes toward assessment, placed a premium on the process of formative assessment for teaching and learning. In this chapter, we will look at how the process of formative assess- ment works in the classroom, but first let’s get into a little more detail about what formative assessment is. You can see several definitions of formative Assessment With and for Students • 9 What Experts Say About Formative Assessment An assessment activity can help learning if it provides information to be used as feedback by teachers, and by their pupils in assessing themselves and each other, to modify the teaching and learning activities in which they are engaged. Such assessment becomes ‘formative assessment’ when the evidence is actually used to adapt teaching work to meet learning needs (Black, Harrison, Lee, Marshall, & Wiliam, 2003, p. 2). The process used by teachers and students to recognize and respond to student learning in order to enhance that learning, during the learning (Bell & Cowie, 2001, p. 536). Formative assessment is defined as assessment carried out during the instructional process for the purpose of improving teaching or learning (Shepard et al., 2005, p. 75). Assessment for learning involves teachers in using a classroom assessment process to advance, not merely to check on learning (Stiggins, 2002, p. 5). Formative assessment “takes place day by day and allows the teacher and the student to adapt their respective actions to the teaching/learning situation in question” (Allal & Lopez, 2005, p. 244). Assessment for learning is the process of seeking and interpreting evidence for use by learners and their teachers to decide where the learners are in their learning, where they need to go and how best to get there (Assessment Reform Group, 2002, pp. 1–2). Formative assessment is a planned process in which assessment-elicited evidence of students’ status is used by teachers to adjust their ongoing instructional procedures or by students to adjust their current learning tactics (Popham, 2008, p. 6). We see much more effective use of formative evaluation if it is separated from the grading process and used primarily as an aid to teaching (Bloom, 1969, p. 48). assessment in the box above. Notice some of the key phrases these experts use in relation to formative assessment: • Information to be used as feedback by teachers and their pupils ... • Enhancing that learning during the learning ... • For the purpose of improving teaching and learning ... • Takes place day by day ... • Decide where pupils need to go and how to get there ... 10 • Formative Assessment • Advance, not merely check on, student learning ... • By students to adjust their current learning tactics ... The function of formative assessment as a means to improve learning during instruction clearly comes through, as does the idea that not only teachers but also students are active users of formative assessment. In sum, formative assessment is a process that takes place continuously during the course of teaching and learning to provide teachers and students with feed- back to close the gap between current learning and desired goals. THE PROCESS OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT Now we are going to look closely at the process of formative assessment shown in Figure 2.1. Each element of the process is elaborated in subsequent chapters. What is important at this point is for you to gain an overview of the process and its components. Note that the process is framed as a cycle, illustrating that formative assessment is continuous process, integrated into instruction. You’ll also notice that the end point of the cycle is “close the gap.” This is because formative assessment is intended to close the gap between where the learner currently is and where the learner and the teacher want to be at the end of a lesson. The idea of closing the “gap” comes from D. Royce Sadler (1989), who stressed feedback as the centerpiece of formative assessment. Following Ramaprasad (1983), he emphasized that informa- tion is only considered feedback when it is “used to alter the gap” (Sadler, 1989, p. 121). This means that the feedback generated from for- mative assessment must be used to make changes in the students’ learn- ing status and help them close the gap between their current status and the intended learning goal. When the gap is closed, another gap opens as student learning moves to the next stage, and formative assessment is used to close the gap once again. DETERMINE LEARNING GOALS AND DEFINE CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS The process of formative assessment begins (at the top left of Figure 2.1) with teachers identifying the learning goal(s) for a lesson or a sequence of lessons and determining the criteria for success. As Figure 2.1 suggests, the learning goal is derived from a learning progression (more on this in Chapter 4). The learning goal identifies what the students will learn during the course of the lesson or lessons. The success criteria identify what it
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.