241x Filetype PDF File size 1.61 MB Source: core.ac.uk
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE
provided by Helsingin yliopiston digitaalinen arkisto
Clinical Pharmacy Group: Social Pharmacy
Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
Faculty of Pharmacy
University of Helsinki
Public Health and Patient Care Aspects in
Pharmacy Education and Pharmacists’ Role in
National Public Health Programs in India
Siva Prasada Reddy Maddirala Venkata
ACADEMIC DISSERTATION
To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Pharmacy of the University
of Helsinki, for public examination in Auditorium Athena, Siltavuorenpenger 3 A,
on Friday 19 May 2017, at 12 noon.
Helsinki 2017
Supervisors Professor Marja Airaksinen, PhD
Clinical Pharmacy Group: Social Pharmacy
Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy
Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki
Helsinki, Finland
Proprietor Pharmacist Peter Kielgast, PhD
Taastrup Pharmacy
Taastrup Hovedgade 60
2630 Taastrup, Denmark
Pre-examiners Professor B. Suresh
Vice-Chancellor, Jagadguru Sri Shivarathreeshwara University
and
President, Pharmacy Council of India
JSS Medical Institutions Campus
Sri Shivarathreeshwara Nagara
Mysuru – 570 015, Karnataka, India
Dr. T. V. Narayana
Director, Vikas Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Nidigatla village, Korukonda Mandal, Near Airport
Rajahmundry, East Godavari Dist
Andhra Pradesh – 533103, India
Opponent Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Ph.D., PharmD., M.B.A.
Assistant Professor, Department of Social Pharmacy
University of Lisbon, Portugal
© Siva Prasada Reddy Maddirala Venkata 2017
ISBN 978-951-51-3169-0 (paperback)
ISBN 978-951-51-3170-6 (PDF)
Dissertationes Scholae Doctoralis Ad Sanitatem Investigandam Universitatis Helsinkiensis
ISSN 2342-3161 (print)
ISSN 2342-317x (online)
University of Helsinki, Finland 2017
ABSTRACT
Pharmacies are convenient for most people to get to and there is no need for an appointment
to see pharmacist which makes them natural first port of call1 healthcare providers in the
society. Worldwide, pharmacists are potentially a vital link in healthcare chain. Since public
health services do not cater to all the population, pharmacies and private health providers can
play a major role in the healthcare system. This also applies to India with a population of over
1.3 billion. Though there is a large presence, pharmacists both in public as well as in private
2,3,4
sector remain largely an untapped resource in India.
Aims and objectives
The objective of this study was to assess public health and patient care aspects in pharmacy
education and the role of pharmacists in national public health programs (NPHPs) in India. The
research goal was to find out possibilities and ways of extending pharmacists involvement in
national public health programs and how pharmacist education could partly facilitate this shift.
The research was divided into four studies which were published as separate original
publications. Two of the studies were programmatic studies (I, II) and two cross-sectional
surveys (III, IV).
The studies I-IV had the following specific objectives:
to review pharmacy education system in India from public health and patient care
perspective.
to compare curriculum of different Indian pharmacy programs (DPharm, BPharm, and
PharmD) to see overall differences with a focus on the amount of time devoted for
pharmaceutical policies and public health, patient care and pharmacy practice aspects in
the programs (I).
to compare Indian pharmacy curriculum at all levels with pharmacy curriculum of USA,
Finland and Denmark (II).
3
to explore acquaintance of final year pharmacy students with 11 major National Public
Health Programs and their attitude on pharmacists’ involvement in public health and
patient care (III).
to characterize physician perceptions on the role of pharmacists in public health and
patient care (IV).
Comparison of curricula (I,II)
The programmatic studies (I, II) were conducted between March 2012 and 2014. The curricula
collected from the statutory agencies were used for the comparison to see the overall
differences with a focus on the amount of time devoted for pharmaceutical policies and public
health, patient care and pharmacy practice aspects in the programs. (I)
Syllabi of courses leading to 1) registered pharmacist title in India (DPharm, BPharm and
PharmD), 2) USA (PharmD, curriculum from University of Florida), 3) Finland (Master of Science
in Pharmacy program from University of Helsinki), and 4) Denmark (Master of Science in
Pharmacy program from University of Copenhagen) were used for comparison. (II)
The results indicate that Indian DPharm and BPharm programs were industry focused, and only
PharmD has focus on clinical pharmacy and patient oriented services (I). Indian and US PharmD
programs contain most and Indian DPharm and BPharm least public health and patient care
aspects (II). DPharm holders are mainstays of pharmacy practice in India but their degree least
contains patient care and public health aspects. There is a gap in curriculum, particularly at
DPharm level. (I)
Pharmacy Students’ Perceived Knowledge and Attitude on their role in NPHPs (III)
This study was conducted as a classroom survey among final year DPharm, BPharm and PharmD
students in India to explore acquaintance with 11 major NPHPs and their attitude on
pharmacists’ involvement in public health and patient care (III). A survey instrument was
4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.