jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Nutrition Therapy Pdf 146807 | 17246514


 142x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.33 MB       Source: core.ac.uk


File: Nutrition Therapy Pdf 146807 | 17246514
view metadata citation and similar papers at core ac uk brought to you by core provided by digitalcommons university of nebraska univuniversity of nebrersity of nebraska lincoln aska lincoln digitalcommons ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 12 Jan 2023 | 2 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
     View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk                                                                                                                                       brought to you by    CORE
                                                                                                                                                                            provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska
                            UnivUniversity of Nebrersity of Nebraska - Lincoln aska - Lincoln 
                            DigitalCommons@UnivDigitalCommons@University of Nebrersity of Nebraska - Lincoln aska - Lincoln 
                            Nutrition and Health Sciences -- Faculty                                                     Nutrition and Health Sciences, Department of 
                            Publications 
                            6-2010 
                            VValidation alidation of Nutrition of Nutrition StandarStandardizdized Language—Next ed Language—Next Steps Steps 
                            Paula Ritter-Gooder 
                            University of Nebraska-Lincoln 
                            Nancy M. Lewis 
                            University of Nebraska--Lincoln, nlewis2@unl.edu 
                            Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nutritionfacpub 
                                  Part of the Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition Commons 
                            Ritter-Gooder, Paula and Lewis, Nancy M., "Validation of Nutrition Standardized Language—Next Steps" 
                            (2010). Nutrition and Health Sciences -- Faculty Publications. 7. 
                            https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nutritionfacpub/7 
                            This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Nutrition and Health Sciences, Department of at 
                            DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nutrition and Health 
                            Sciences -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 
                         Published in Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Volume 110, Issue 6 (June 2010), pp. 832, 834–835; doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.04.016   
                                              Copyright © 2010 American Dietetic Association; published by Elsevier Inc. Used by permission.
                                                                              Published online May 22, 2010. 
                      Validation of Nutrition Standardized Language—Next Steps 
                                                                    Paula Ritter-Gooder, PhD, RD, LMNT 
                                                                       Nancy M. Lewis, PhD, RD, FADA
                   Paula Ritter-Gooder is a research assistant, and Nancy M. Lewis is a professor in the Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of 
                   Nebraska–Lincoln.
                       To provide a model for quality care and        ognized leaders and award winners the task        the terms are accurate for labeling nutri-
                   outcomes management, the Nutrition Care            of identifying nutrition problems. Later, a       tion problems.
                   Process (NCP) and standardized language            12-member NCP/Standardized Language                   A validated standardized language pro-
                   were introduced in 2003 by the American            Committee gathered input on the initial           vides the benefit of allowing RDs to differ-
                   Dietetic Association (ADA).                        set of diagnostic terms from community,           entiate one diagnostic term from another 
                       The standardized language, published in        ambulatory, acute care, and long-term care        (13, 14). RDs identify a nutrition diagnosis 
                   the International Dietetics & Nutrition Termi-     practitioners and researchers. The results        by observing the signs and symptoms that 
                   nology (IDNT) Reference Manual: Standardized       of this work, the labeling of nutrition di-       demonstrate its presence in a patient along 
                   Language for the Nutrition Care Process (1),       agnostic terms, was published (6), and an-        with the underlying cause, the etiology. 
                   is designed to facilitate communication,           nual updates (7, 8) were made as terminol-        Signs/symptoms of a diagnostic term must 
                   improve care, and close the gap in health          ogy was identified for the remaining steps        occur in a cluster in a sufficient number of 
                   care quality (2). When registered dietitians       in the NCP—assessment, intervention,  cases to be included in the diagnostic term 
                   (RDs) are oriented to a nutrition care pro-        and monitoring and evaluation.                    and these sets of highly reliable clues pro-
                   cess, improvement in their documentation                                                             vide accuracy in diagnosing. For exam-
                   of nutrition care occurs (3). Since the in-        Validation Refines the Standardized               ple, the diagnostic terms involuntary weight 
                   troduction of the NCP and standardized             Language                                          loss and inadequate energy intake require val-
                   language, RDs and dietetic technicians,                                                              idated clusters of signs and symptoms 
                   registered (DTRs), have begun to adopt                After the diagnostic terms are labeled,        within each diagnosis to allow the RD to 
                   the process and language into their prac-          the next logical step in language develop-        distinguish between the diagnoses. Is each 
                   tice (4, 5). This article explains why valida-     ment is to validate the language (9). Con-        diagnostic term a separate and distinct 
                   tion of the standardized language is needed        tent validation is the process of testing the     concept? The ability of RDs and DTRs to 
                   to make the language accurate and mean-            language to learn whether the diagnostic          discern between diagnostic terms provides 
                   ingful for practice and describes how vali-        terms fulfill the intended purpose of iden-       for accuracy and consistency in use of the 
                   dation is conducted using RDs.                     tifying and labeling separate and distinct        standardized language. Accuracy in diag-
                                                                      nutrition problems (10). In essence, valida-      nosing is required for determining what 
                   Origins of the Standardized                        tion of the content of nutrition diagnostic       evidence-based interventions are needed 
                   Language                                           terms confirms or verifies the definition,        and what outcomes can be expected. The 
                                                                      related etiologies, and the signs/symptoms        validation of the diagnostic terms may pos-
                       The standardized language consists of          required to define the term and ensure the        sibly disclose overlap of some terms.
                   terms describing all NCP steps; assess-            language is clear, explicit, and succinct for         Another benefit of validating the stan-
                   ment, diagnosis, intervention, and moni-           each term. Currently, one published study         dardized language is explicating or defin-
                   toring and evaluation. Nutrition diagnostic        has been conducted to test the validity of        ing the meanings of the signs/symptoms 
                   terms were the first language identified us-       the content of the diagnostic terms by us-        for proper measurement and use by RDs. 
                   ing concept analysis, a critical first step in     ing a convenience sample of RDs to test           Definitions of signs/symptoms and re-
                   language development (Figure). Concept             all IDNT diagnostic terms (11). Another           lated etiologies of the term are instruc-
                   analysis is a method of examining attri-           study measured the reliability of use of          tions for what will be observed and how 
                   butes or characteristics of nutrition prob-        the terms among RDs with different years          it will be observed. Operational defini-
                   lems for the purpose of defining the do-           of practice (12). Clearly, more validation        tions are needed to provide the bridge be-
                   main and boundary of each term. In this            studies are needed using nutrition experts        tween incidental observation and scien-
                   process, the definition, etiologies, and           with experience in providing patient care         tific validation (15) and make it possible to 
                   signs/symptoms of the term are proposed.           for each of the 60 diagnostic terms in the        replicate studies and relate findings across 
                   ADA initiated this step by appointing rec-         IDNT reference manual (1) to assure that          studies. For example, the signs/symptoms 
                                                                                           832
                 Validation of nutrition Standardized language—next StepS                                                                                       834
                 Figure 1. Development and refinement of the American Dietetic Association’s standardized language diagnostic terms. aFehring RJ. The Fehring model. 
                 In Carroll-Johnson RM, ed. Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Tenth Conference. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott; 1994:55-62 (19).
                 of early satiety and poor intake listed in the    RDs in different practice settings or pa-          toms are more easily remembered than a 
                 standardized language may have different          tient populations. Validation uses expert          longer list of less-specific parameters. The 
                 meanings among RDs and DTRs. If these             and clinical testing in two separate phases        possible reduction in the number of defin-
                 are described as “stops eating within five        (Figure 1, Step 2a and 2b). In the expert          ing signs/symptoms and related etiologies 
                 minutes” and “eats less than 50% offered”         validation phase (Figure 1, Step 2a), nu-          would make the diagnostic terms easier to 
                 they have clearer meaning. The evidence or        trition experts analyze the content of the         use by RDs and DTRs.
                 results of the validation are strengthened        term. Experts use fewer cues or signs/                Content validation by expert RDs pro-
                 when meanings are explicit; therefore, val-       symptoms when compared with novices to             vides evidence that the group thinks a cer-
                 idating the standardized language requires        derive a correct diagnosis (18). To validate       tain way. However, there are no assurances 
                 operational definitions of all items.             content of the term, the relevance, speci-         that their judgment represents real-world 
                                                                   ficity, representatives, and clarity of the di-    phenomena. In the second phase of con-
                 Validation Models for Diagnostic                  agnosis is rated among the experts using a         tent validation (Figure 1, Step 2b), the di-
                 Terms                                             quantitative Likert-type scale in the Diag-        agnoses are studied using the Clinical Diag-
                                                                   nostic Content Validation Model (19). A            nostic Validation Model (19) in the clinical 
                    In the early 1980s, methodologies for          weighted response for each item is calcu-          setting to provide a total picture of content 
                 validating nursing diagnoses appeared in          lated to arrive at a mean score. Using the         validity. Independent clinicians observe 
                 the literature, with these methods still          mean score, items are classified into major,       and rate the etiologies and signs/symp-
                 used in their research today (16, 17). Vali-      minor, or irrelevant characteristics. The ir-      toms in patients who are prediagnosed by 
                 dation of nutrition diagnostic terms should       relevant etiologies and signs/symptoms             a clinical expert other than the observers. 
                 replicate the scientific rigor and models         are removed. A reduction in the number of          The same scoring method of the Diagnos-
                 used in nursing validation studies to re-         signs/symptoms needed to identify a diag-          tic Content Validation Model is used to ob-
                 fine the language (Figure 1). The models          nosis has been an outcome of nursing di-           tain major, minor, and nonrelevant char-
                 allow comparisons between studies of the          agnosis language validation studies (20,           acteristics. The validated language is then 
                 same language when one term is rated by           21). Conceptual and succinct signs/symp-           available for IDNT revisions and future re-
                     835                                                ritter-gooder & lewiS in Journal of the american Dietetic association 110 (2010)
                     search studies that collect and measure nu-               cess/Standardized Language Commit-                    ference, Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA (1994), 
                     trition care outcomes captured from elec-                 tee, Nutrition care process and model part            pp. 55–62. 
                     tronic health care records. This research                 I: The 2008 update, J Am Diet Assoc 108           20. N. Oliveira, T. Chianca, and G. H. Rassool, 
                     is vital to inform evidence-based practice                (2008), pp. 1113–1117.                                A validation study of the nursing diagnosis 
                     (22), to improve quality of care, and to fa-          5. Writing Group of the Nutrition Care Pro-               anxiety in Brazil, In J Nurs Terminol Classif 19 
                     cilitate reimbursement of nutrition ser-                  cess/Standardized Language Committee,                 (2008), pp. 102–110. 
                     vices (23, 24).                                           Nutrition care process part II: Using the In-     21. E. V. Carmona and M.H.B.M. Lopes, Con-
                                                                               ternational Dietetics and Nutrition Ter-              tent validation of parental role conflict in 
                                                                               minology to document the nutrition care               the neonatal intensive care unit, In J Nurs 
                     Future Direction                                          process, J Am Diet Assoc 108 (2008), pp.              Terminol Classif 17 (2006), pp. 3–9. 
                                                                               1287–1293.                                        22. American Dietetic Association House of 
                        Diagnostic terms may be validated us-              6. American Dietetic Association. Nutrition Di-           Delegate, Fall 2009 mega issues: Evidence-
                     ing nutrition experts who are members of                  agnosis: A Critical Step in the Nutrition Care        based practice and health reform. American 
                     dietetic practice groups and board-certi-                 Process. Chicago, IL: American Dietetic As-           Dietetic Association website:  http://www.
                     fied specialists who commonly see the nu-                 sociation; 2006.                                      eatright.org/HODMegaIssues ; accessed 
                     trition problems in their practice setting.           7. American Dietetic Association. Nutrition Di-           August 27, 2009.
                     By involving RDs in these validation stud-                agnosis and Intervention: Standardized Language   23. N. Hakel-Smith and N. M. Lewis, A stan-
                                                                               for the Nutrition Care Process. Chicago, IL:          dardized nutrition care process and lan-
                     ies, the exposure to and adoption of the                  American Dietetic Association; 2007.                  guage are essential components of a concep-
                     standardized language may increase, as a              8. American Dietetic Association. International           tual model to guide and document nutrition 
                     recent ADA survey of the dietetics profes-                Dietetics and Nutrition Terminology (IDNT) Ref-       care and patient outcomes, J Am Diet Assoc 
                     sion revealed that less than one third were               erence Manual. 1st ed. Chicago, IL: American          104 (2004), pp. 1878–1884. 
                     familiar with ADA’s standardized language                 Dietetic Association; 2008.                       24. K. Sandrick, Is nutrition diagnosing a criti-
                     initiative and only 16% use the nutrition             9. A. M. Hubley and B. D. Zumbo, A dialectic              cal step in the nutrition care process?, J Am 
                     diagnostic terms (25). The IDNT should                    on validity: Where we have been and where             Diet Assoc 102 (2002), pp. 427–431. 
                     continue to be used while researchers and                 we are going, J Gen Psychol 123 (1996), pp.       25. E. J. Ayres and L. B. Hoggle, ADA nutrition 
                                                                               207–215.                                              informatics member survey: Results and fu-
                     practitioners work together to validate the           10. S. N. Haynes, D.C.S. Richard, and E. S.               ture steps, J Am Diet Assoc 108 (2008), pp. 
                     language, and it is likely that additional di-            Kubany, Content validity in psychological             1822–1826. 
                     agnostic terms may be conceptualized as                   assessment; A functional approach to con-
                     the field of dietetics advances. Refining                 cepts and methods, Psychological Assessment 7 
                     the standardized language through valida-                 (1995), pp. 238–247.                                         Standardized Language  
                     tion studies is both useful and meaningful            11. E. Enrione, Content validation of nutri-                      Resources and Updates
                     to the dietetics profession. A validated lan-             tion diagnosis, Top Clin Nutr 23 (2008), pp. 
                     guage will facilitate documentation of nu-                306–319.                                              Take advantage of the following resources 
                     trition care. In turn this will make it possi-        12. P. J. Charney, J. K. O’Sullivan Maillet, R.           and periodic updates on standardized lan-
                                                                               Touger-Decker, P. Splett, E. Meyers, and S.           guage available from the ADA:
                     ble to collect the evidence needed to show                Haque, Reliability of nutrition diagnostic la-
                     the impact of nutrition services on patient               bels when used by registered dietitians at            ADA Members: http://www.eatright.
                     outcomes.                                                 three levels of practice, J Am Diet Assoc 106:8           org/Members/content.aspx?id=5477  
                                                                               (suppl) (2006), p. A12.                               Health Professionals: http://www.
                     Acknowledgments — This manuscript is a                13. L. O. Walker and K. C. Avant, Strategies for              eatright.org/HealthProfessionals/
                     contribution of the University of Nebraska Ag-            Theory Construction in Nursing (3rd ed.), Ap-             content.aspx?id=7077   
                     ricultural Research Division. This manuscript             pleton and Lange, Norwalk, CT (1995).                 • Nutrition Care Process SNAPshots out-
                     was supported in part through the American            14. B. L. Rodgers, Concept analysis: An evo-                  lining the standardized language in 
                     Dietetic Association and the Hatch Act.                   lutionary view. In: B.L. Rodgers and K.A.                 the four steps of the Nutrition Care 
                                                                               Knafl, Editors, Concept Development in Nurs-              Process.
                     References                                                ing: Foundations, Techniques, and Applications.       •  Helpful  toolkits  for  applying  the  Nu-
                                                                               (2nd ed.), WB Saunders, Philadelphia, PA                  trition Care Process/Standardized 
                     1. American Dietetic Association. International           (2000), pp. 77–102.                                       Language (NCP/SL) in the neonatal 
                        Dietetics and Nutrition Terminology (IDNT) Ref-    15. J. Grant and M. Kinney, The need for oper-                intensive care unit setting and long-
                        erence Manual. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Ameri-             ational definitions for defining characteris-             term care setting and for establishing 
                        can Dietetic Association; 2009.                        tics, Nurs Diagn 2 (1991), pp. 181–185.                   electronic records using the NCP/SL 
                     2. Institute of Medicine, Crossing the Quality        16. G. G. Whitley, Processes and methodologies                terminology.
                        Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Cen-           for research validation of nursing diagnoses,         •  Supplemental  material  and  references 
                        tury. The National Academies Press web-                Nurs Diagn 10 (1999), pp. 5–14.                           for the International Dietetics Nutrition 
                        site: http://books.nap.edu/html/quality_           17. L. M.Hoskins, How to do a validation                      Terminology Reference Manual, including 
                        chasm/reportbrief.pdf  Published March                 study. In: M. Rantz & P. Lemone, eds.,                    procedures for submitting standard-
                        2001; accessed May 5, 2009.                            Classification of Nursing Diagnoses: Proceed-             ized language changes.
                     3. N. Hakel-Smith, N. M. Lewis, and K. M. Es-             ings of the Twelfth Conference. Glendale, CA:         •  Research  opportunities  for  all  ADA 
                        kridge, Orientation to nutrition care pro-             CINAHL1997:79-86.                                         members to contribute toward devel-
                        cess standards improves nutrition care doc-        18. P. Benner, From Novice to Expert, Adison-                 oping the terms in the fourth step of 
                        umentation by nutrition practitioners, J Am            Wesley, Menlo Park, CA (1984).                            the Nutrition Care Process—moni-
                        Diet Assoc 105 (2005), pp. 1582–1589.              19. R. J. Fehring, The Fehring model. In: R.                  toring and evaluation.
                     4. Writing Group of the Nutrition Care Pro-               M. Carroll-Johnson, Editor, Classification of 
                                                                               Nursing Diagnoses: Proceedings of the Tenth Con-
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...View metadata citation and similar papers at core ac uk brought to you by provided digitalcommons university of nebraska univuniversity nebrersity lincoln aska univdigitalcommons nutrition health sciences faculty department publications vvalidation alidation standarstandardizdized language next ed steps paula ritter gooder nancy m lewis nlewis unl edu follow this additional works https nutritionfacpub part the dietetics clinical commons validation standardized article is for free open access it has been accepted inclusion in an authorized administrator published journal american dietetic association volume issue june pp doi j jada copyright elsevier inc used permission online may phd rd lmnt fada a research assistant professor provide model quality care ognized leaders award winners task terms are accurate labeling nutri outcomes management identifying problems later tion process ncp member validated pro were introduced committee gathered input on initial vides benefit allowing rds dif...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.