124x Filetype PDF File size 3.16 MB Source: www.hyperemesis.org
PERIPHERAL ACCESS SITES PARENTERAL NUTRITION FOR PA R E N T E R A L CAROL J. ROLLINS, MS, RD, PH A R MD , N U T R I T I O N BCNSP COORDINATOR, NUTRITION SUPPORT SERVICE/ Access for parenteral CLINICAL PHARMACIST FOR HOME INFUSION, nutrition is generally ARIZONA HEALTHSCIENCES CENTER TUCSON, ARIZONA obtained by placement of a central ve n o u s P arenteral nutrition (PN) is an appropriate route of catheter. Cannulation of nutrition support when patients with identified malnu- the subclavian, internal trition or significant risk of malnutrition cannot meet jugular, or femoral veins their nutritional requirements through the gastroin- with advancement of 1 the catheter tip into the testinal (GI) tract. Although typically referred to as superior or inferior vena cava ach i eves central T P N, an acronym for total parenteral nutrition, venous access. Catheter tip placement elsewhere patients who tolerate some oral intake or tube feeding than the vena cava is considered peripheral access. require delivery of only part of their nutrients via the Based on catheter tip location, the Intrave n o u s parenteral route. Use of the GI tract is encouraged to Nursing Society (INS) recognizes peripheral catheters the extent possible. Septic complications may be as midclavicular, midline, and short peripheral.4,5 reduced and gut villi better preserved with administra- Acceptable dwell time differs for these 3 categories; 2 , 3 tion of at least some nutrients into the GI tract. continued pg 2 Peripheral continued however, risk of vascular irritation or damage and thrombosis requires Larger veins, such as the median, that guidelines for peripheral administration be imposed for all classes cephalic, or basilic veins in the of peripheral catheters. Guidelines include limiting dextrose concentra- forearm, are preferred for hyper- tions and hypertonicity of substances administered, since dilution by tonic or irritating substances, for blood flow is less than with central venous administration. Parenteral larger volume infusions, and for nutrition administered via the peripheral venous route, known as therapies administered using a 10 peripheral parenteral nutrition or PPN, must be formulated with these pump. PPN fits all these criteria. limitations in mind. Typical indications for PPN include short-term use, Midclavicular lines are generally modest needs, and contraindications to central access (subclavian or inserted through the basilic or jugular catheters) placement, such as radical neck dissection. cephalic veins of the upper arm or at the antecubital fossa and CAUSES OF INFUSION-SITE FA I L U R E extend at least to the proximal axillary vein, where vein size and Several factors related to the cannula, patient, and infusate blood flow are relatively large. influence the ability to provide PPN successfully. Acquiring and Midline catheters are inserted maintaining access for an appropriate period of time is essen- through veins in the antecubital tial. Infusion site failure is manifested by phlebitis, thrombosis, fossa and extend 5 to 7 inches or infiltration/extravasation. into the vessel, where vein diam- eter is still about 5 to 6 millime- • Phlebitis is inflammation of a vein, and is characterized ters.5,11 Short peripheral catheters by erythema with or without pain. It may include a visual generally extend less than 3 inch- streak along the vein, edema, and hardening of the vein es into a superficial vein.4 Vein (cord formation).4 diameter here is smaller, and dwell time is generally limited to a • Thrombosis is formation of a blood clot within the vessel. f ew days. Site rotation and • Thrombophlebitis is a combination of phlebitis and peripheral catheter replacement thrombosis. every 48 to 72 hours is com- mon.11-14 The cumulative risk of • Infiltration is leakage of a non-vesicant product into tissue. complications increases each day that a catheter is in place. The • Extravasation is the proper term when the product risk remains at 10% to 15% per 4 6,15 is a vesicant. day from day 2 until day 4. Use of superficial veins in the The reported incidence of phlebitis or thrombophlebitis ranges upper extremities allows proper from 2.3% up to approximately 80%,4,6-9 and an incidence of up assessment for complications.1 2 to 45% is reported for infiltration/extravasation.6 Guidelines from the INS and the Centers for Disease Control strongly recommend that only veins in the upper extremities be SITES OF CANNULAT I O N cannulated in adults, since the risk of deep vein thrombosis is The site of cannulation, cannula size and dwell time, insertion tech- increased in the lower extremi- nique, and catheter care affect development of complications that may ties.4,11,12,16 Selection of the small- result in infusion site failure. est gauge and shortest catheter acceptable for administration of 22 therapy may help limit complica- which in turn dictates the amount I M P O RTANCE OF LIPID EMULSION tions. The catheter must be in a of fluid and lipid emulsion neces- Lipid emulsion appears to provide vein of adequate diameter to sary. In general, it is difficult to protection to the vein and allows a l l ow blood flow around the provide adequate support via PPN tolerance to higher osmolarity catheter and hemodilution of the for a patient with severe metabol- infusates. Animal studies demon- 4,13 infusate. ic stress or nutritional depletion strate reduced endothelial dam- Successful PPN therapy requires requiring electrolyte replacement age from amino acid solutions an adequate number of healthy and high calorie or protein intake. when fat emulsion is also 17,18 veins for cannulation when short infused. Venous patency time peripheral catheters are used. was improved in neonates given Patients with poor ve n o u s a high-fat formulation versus access are rarely acceptable It is difficult to provide a lowe r-fat formulation of candidates for PPN thera- “ the same osmolarity.1 9 py, unless midline or mid- adequate support via PPN A longer patency time was clavicular access can be for a patient with severe also noted when the attained. Veins tend to lose metabolic stress or neonates received a lower supporting tissue and nutritional depletion osmolarity PPN formu l a t i o n become elongated and tortuous ” (547 mOsm/L vs 702 mOsm/L with age.1 3 Veins are generally and 702 mOsm/L vs 784 smaller and more fragile in older mOsm/L) in a paired crossover patients than in younger patients. Parenteral support for more than study design.19 Those with a history of long-term a few days, even at lower levels of corticosteroid use, severe malnu- calorie and protein provision, is T O TAL NUTRIENT ADMIXTURE trition, and debilitating diseases difficult to maintain with short Vein tolerance to hyposmolar also tend to have small fragile peripheral catheters. Midline or f o r mulations may be further veins. Repeated intravenous ther- midclavicular catheter placement i m p r oved by admixture of the apies can result in venous trauma should be considered when PPN is lipid emulsion with the dextrose- and scarring, which limit periph- expected to be necessary for amino acid solution (total nutrient eral access. more than 1 week. Barring any admixture [TNA]). This beneficial complications, midline catheters effect may be secondary to I N D I C ATIONS OF PPN can remain in place for up the increase in pH of the TNA to 4 weeks and midclav i c u l a r formulation and may be negated 4,5 PPN is useful for supplementation catheters for up to 3 months. since peripheral vein TNAs are of inadequate oral or tube feeding notoriously unstable admixtures intake, hypocaloric support with F O R M U L ATIONS compared with central TNAs.2 0 low to moderate protein provi- FOR PPN In a randomized trial comparing sion, transitional support until Infusate-related factors influence co-infused lipids with admixed central access can be obtained, venous complications and patient lipids, significantly better vein and temporary support until tolerance to PPN. Preparations of tolerance was noted with catheter replacement follow i n g dextrose with normal saline and the admixed formu l a t i o n .2 1 recurrent catheter-related sepsis. dextrose with amino acid solution Tolerance to osmolarities of Current nutritional status and consistently result in peripheral approximately 1300 mOsm/L for underlying conditions help deter- vein phlebitis when the osmolari- formulations admixed with lipid mine nutritional requirements, ty exceeds 900 mOsm/L.6 have been reported.22,23 M . V.I. N E W S L I N E S, SPONSORED BY ASTRAZENECA LP 3 Another report noted no problems in 63% of patients receiving a PPN M A C R O N U T R I E N T S formulation with admixed lipids having an osmolarity of 1146 mOsm/L. Twenty-three percent of patients experienced transient pain, and 14% Macronutrient concentrations are had the infusion stopped.24 This suggests that osmolarities in the range typically limited in PPN formula- of 1100 mOsm/L to 1300 mOsm/L are acceptable when lipid emulsion tions because of osmolarity. The is admixed with dextrose-amino acid solutions. Caution with these high- final concentration of amino er osmolarities is advised. acids is generally between 2.5% (25 g/L) and 5% (50 g/L) for REDUCING THE RISKS FOR THROMBOSIS AND PHLEBITIS P P N.3 2 Specialized amino acid solutions are rarely appropriate Addition of low-dose heparin and hydrocortisone to PPN formulations for PPN, since the patient popula- may increase tolerance to hyperosmolar formulations. The incidence of tions for which such products are vein thrombosis appears to be reduced by addition of low-dose heparin designed tend to be poor candi- 25,26 (1 unit/mL) to peripherally administered fluids. Premature infants dates for PPN therapy. receiving 1 unit of heparin per milliliter of PPN had about one-third the incidence of thrombophlebitis (5.7% vs 17.2%) and nearly double the The generally recognized upper duration of catheter patency of those without heparin.25 Adding 10 mg/L limit for dextrose concentrations of hydrocortisone and 1000 units of heparin per liter to infusion solu- in PPN formulations is 10% tions of 5% dextrose or 5% dextrose with 0.45% sodium chloride pro- for adults (approximately 500 duced nearly the same results in phlebitis as buffering the solutions (pH mOsm/L) and 12.5% for pediatric 7.2 to 7.5).27 Heparin should be avoided in patients with a history of patients (625 mOsm/L). At these heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Significant reduction of peripheral concentrations, dextrose pro- vein thrombophlebitis has been reported in ran- vides 340 Kcal/L in adults and domized placebo controlled trials with 425 Kcal/L in pediatric patients. use of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate Glycerol (glycerin) has also in both PPN and non-PPN The incidence of vein been used as a carbohy- p a t i e n t s .2 8 - 3 0 In normal healthy “ drate source in com- subjects, application of a topi- thrombosis appears to be mercially prepared cal nonsteroidal anti-inflamma- reduced by addition of PPN solutions. The tory agent to the cannulation low-dose heparin neutral pH, higher site on one arm reduced the inci- (1 unit/mL) to peripherally caloric density (4.3 dence of phlebitis by nearly half in administered fluids. Kcal/g), and trihydroxy comparison with the site on the other ” alcohol structure of glyc- arm, which served as a placebo.31 erin favor its use in PPN. OSMOLARITY OF THE PPN FORMULAT I O N Lipid emulsion provides a major source of calories in PPN formula- The prescription for a PPN formulation has a significant influence on tions, since calories from carbo- how well the therapy will be tolerated. As previously mentioned, osmo- hydrates are limited by the osmo- larity is a critical consideration. Dextrose, amino acids, and electrolytes larity. Guidelines suggest that fats are the major contributors to osmolarity. The osmolarity can be be provided at no more than 60% estimated as shown in the boxed equation that follows. of total calories and no more than 1.5 g/kg of body weight per day in adults.33 The maximum recom- OSMOLARITY (m O s m / L) = (GRAMS DEXTROSE/LITER) x 5 + (GRAMS AMINO ACID/LITER) x 10 + mended dose of lipids in children (m E q C ATIONS/LITER) x 2 and adolescents is 2.0 g/kg/d to 2.5 g/kg/d. Infants may tolerate 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.