267x Filetype PDF File size 0.50 MB Source: storage.unitedwebnetwork.com
J. Algal Biomass Utln. 2011, 2 (1): 10 – 20 Algae in fish nutrition
© PHYCO SPECTRUM INC
Composite algal supplementation in nutrition of Oreochromis mossambicus
1 2 2 2
Sudeshna Sen Roy , Atreyee Chaudhuri , Sudeshna Mukherjee , Sumit HomeChauduri and
1
Ruma Pal
1 2
Phycology Laboratory, Department of Botany and Aquatic Bioresource Laboratory, Department of
Zoology, University of Calcutta, 35, Ballygunge Circular Road, Kolkata-700 019, India
Email: rpalcu@rediffmail.com
Key words: Algal feed; composite algal mix; nutrition; Oreochromis; proximate composition
Abstract
Composite algal mix has been used as feed supplement in nutrition of Oreochromis mossambicus and its
effect on growth performance, feed efficiency, nutrient utilisation and body composition was investigated
in a 12 week feeding trial. Three isonitrogenous diets containing 0 % (conventional feed, CF), 35% (value
added feed, VAF) and 100% (algal feed, AF) algal supplementation were used in combination with other
conventional fish feed ingredients. The algal genera used were Phormidium valderianum, Spirulina
subsalsa, Navicula minima, Chlorococcum infusionum and Rhizoclonium riparium in a ratio of
35:35:12:12:6 for experimental feed formulation. Fish fed with VAF showed an increased growth
performance (P < 0.05), feed efficiency and nutrient utilisation compared to 0 % and 100% supplemented
diets. Carcass lipid levels decreased at 35% supplementation level. The results suggested that, 35 %
supplementation of conventional feed with composite algal mix can be used in mossambique tilapia diet.
Introduction make up about 60% of an intensive
aquaculture regimen (Güroy et al. 2007).
Fish has long been used as the Traditionally, animal protein sources,
cheapest source of protein for human particularly fishmeal are used as the major
nutrition worldwide – still with a gap in ingredients of aqua feeds (Glencross et al.
production and supply (Tidwell and Allan, 2007). Fishmeal is one of the most
2001). A major determinant of successful expensive ingredients in formulated fish
growth and intensification of aquaculture feeds in one hand and its regular use reduces
production depends on aqua feed. Feed costs the diversity of marine fauna on the other.
10
J. Algal Biomass Utln. 2011, 2 (1): 10 – 20 Algae in fish nutrition
© PHYCO SPECTRUM INC
Therefore, to reduce the cost of aqua feeds, in developing country like India and others.
non conventional sources of proteins are in Therefore, exploration of local algae for
high demand. Plant feed stuffs are aquaculture usage is much more relevant for
considered as economically viable and useful cheap production of aquaculture feed.
environment friendly feed ingredients and In India, most of the fish farmers use
can be considered as essential biomass for the mixture of rice bran and mustard oil cake
future aquaculture feed formulation ( Tacon for tilapia farming together with natural
et al. 2006). fauna of the pond. In the present study to
Algae have emerged as an alternative formulate cheap and better feed, 35%
protein source since long back and their use supplementation with algal biomass was
is quite popular in modern aquaculture tested for value addition to the conventional
industry .Potential algal genera contain feed using Tilapia (Oreochromis
about 30-70% protein, 10-20% lipid, 5-15% mossambicus) as model fish. Five algal taxa
carbohydrate and high amount of with high growth rate and relatively cheap
carotenoids with antioxidant property production cost were chosen as feed
(Becker, 2004). Most commonly used algal ingredients. The new composite mixture was
genera include microalgae like, Chlorella, formulated after several trials. A total
Nannochloropsis, Pavlova, Tetraselmis, (100%) replacement of conventional feed by
Thalassiosira, Isochrysis, Dunaliella, composite algal biomass was also used to
Haematococcus, Scenedesmus, etc. (Brown understand the efficacy of algal meal as fish
et al. 1997; Yamaguchi, 1997; Borowitzka, feed. Three marine genera viz. Phormidium
1998; Apt and Behrens 1999; Muller-Feuga, valderianum, Spirulina subsalsa and
2000; Soletto et al. 2005). But most of the Navicula minima and two fresh water genera
reports are available on use of single algal Chlorococcum infusionum and
genus as fish feed ingredients ,therefore Rhizoclonium riparium were taken as
availability of algal biomass may be the experimental materials.
major constrain in using them (Appler and Materials and methods
Jauncey, 1983; Appler, 1985; Güroy et al. A mixture of two cyanobacterial genera viz.
2007; Azaza et al. 2008).Moreover, the Phormidium valderianum Gomon, 1892,
production cost including the harvesting of Spirulina subsalsa Ørsted ex Gomont 1892
the unicellular micro-algae are quite and three eukaryotic algal genera viz.
expensive making them almost unaffordable Navicula minima Grunow in Van Heurck,
11
J. Algal Biomass Utln. 2011, 2 (1): 10 – 20 Algae in fish nutrition
© PHYCO SPECTRUM INC
3
1880 (Bacillariophyceae), Chlorococcum 0.38 m ) containing 80 L water with a flow
infusionum Schrank 1811 (Chlorophyceae) rate of about 1L min-1. All the fishes were
and Rhizoclonium riparium (Roth) Kützing starved for 24h prior to the onset of the
ex Harvey 1849 (Chlorophyceae) were used feeding trial. A 12- weeks feeding trial was
as the experimental feed supplements. carried out in triplicate groups of 20 fishes
Oreochromis mossambicus Peters 1852 was each (1.8-1.9 g). Three experimental sets
used as model fish. were prepared for each experimental diet.
Collection and culturing of algae Set 1 was fed with conventional feed (CF)
and considered as control feed; set 2 was fed
The experimental algal genera were with algal feed (AF) with 100%
collected from eastern parts of India, isolated supplementation and set 3 was fed with
following standard protocols and micro algal value added feed (VAF) with 35% algal
cultures were raised for biomass utilization. supplementation. All groups of fish were fed
Unialgal batch cultures of Cyanobacteria their respective diets to apparent satiation
were grown using ASN III (Ott, 1965), for twice a day at 0900h and 1700 h. The
Navicula ASN III media was supplemented uneaten food was collected after 1h of
with SiO4 and for Cholorococcum BBM feeding and dry matter content was
(Bold, 1942) were used. Rhizoclonium was determined (AOAC, 1995) for feed
collected from Kakdweep, West Bengal and consumption calculation. The fishes were
used in feed ingredients as natural resource. weighed every fortnight after a 24-h
Experimental fish, rearing condition and starvation period to determine the daily
feeding regime ration. Water quality was monitored
throughout the feeding experiments with the
Juvenile Oreochromis mossambicus of same water temperature, dissolved oxygen and pH
age group (1.7-1.8 g ± 0.54 ) were purchased being maintained at 26±1°C, 6.8±1.1 mg L-1
from a government fish breeding farm and 7.1±0.4 respectively.
(Kolkata, India). They were acclimatized for
2 weeks in the laboratory condition and were Experimental diets
fed with commercial diet for proper rearing. The pre-weighed dry algae were mixed in a
The experimental trial was conducted in proportion of Phormidium: Spirulina:
large rectangular flow through fibre Navicula: Chlorococcum: Rhizoclonium ::
reinforced plastic (FRP) tanks (0.6 x 0.5 x 35:35:12:12:6 to prepare the composite algal
12
J. Algal Biomass Utln. 2011, 2 (1): 10 – 20 Algae in fish nutrition
© PHYCO SPECTRUM INC
mix using a food mixer. The algae free and protein efficiency ratio (PER). Fishes
conventional feed (CF) and 2 experimental were randomly selected from each
diets viz. value added feed (VAF) containing experimental tank and decapitated for such
35% replacement of CF with composite analysis after 84 days of experimentation.
algal mix and algal feed (AF) i.e. 100% The formulae used are as follows:
replacement of CF were prepared using a 1. WG = [(Final body weight (g) - Initial
feed pelletiser machine. All the feeds were body weight (g))/ Initial body weight (g)] x
formulated to meet the 40% protein 100
requirement of juvenile tilapia
(Fitzsimmons, 1997). The formulation and 2. SGR= [(ln Final body weight (g) - ln
chemical composition of feeds are shown in Initial body weight (g) / Number of days] x
table 1. 100
Analytical procedures 3. FCR = Dry feed fed (g) / Live body
Analysis of dry matter (by oven drying at weight gain (g)
105 °C for 24 h), crude protein (Kjeldahl 4. PER = Body weight gain (g) / Crude
apparatus, nitrogen X 6.25), crude lipid protein fed (g) x 100
(extraction with petroleum ether by Soxhlet Statistical Analysis
apparatus), crude fibre (by an automatic
analyzer, Fibertec, Tecator, Sweden) and ash All growth data were subjected to one-way
(incineration in a muffle furnace at 600° C analysis of variance (ANOVA). The
for 4 h) were performed for both feed and significance of difference between means
carcass (AOAC, 1995). Water quality was determined by Duncan’s multiple range
parameters were measured following APHA test (P < 0.05) using SPSS for Windows
(1998). (Version 10.0) (Duncan, 1955).
Evaluation of growth performance Results
Growth performance and feed utilization of The nutritive values of the formulated feeds
experimental fish were evaluated by are shown in table 1. A 35% replacement of
standard methods (Siddhuraju and Becker, CF with algal mix (VAF) showed maximum
2003) in terms of final fish weight (g), crude lipid (10.32%), gross energy (24.29 kJ
weight gain (WG, %), specific growth rate g-1), calcium (7.08%) and phosphorus
-1
(SGR, % day ), feed conversion ratio (FCR)
13
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.