172x Filetype PDF File size 0.46 MB Source: www.oecd.org
MICROECONOMIC CHANGES AND MACROECONOMIC WAGE DlSlNFLATlON IN THE 1980s James H. Chan-Lee, David T. Coe and Menahem Prywes CONTENTS Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 1. Microeconomic policies and institutional changes affecting the labour market . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 A. Changes in government microeconomic policies related to social protection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 B. Changes in other government microeconomic policies . . . . . 132 C. Changes in indexation procedures and wage setting practices . 134 II. How have these microeconomic and institutional changes affected wage developments at the macroeconomic level? . . . . . . . . . 135 A. Microeconomic changes and aggregate wage equations . . . . 135 8. The stability of aggregate wage equations in the 1980s . . . 140 Policy implications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 Appendix . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 Bibliography . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156 The authors are members of the General Economics Division of the Economics and Statistics Department. They wish to thank Jeffrey Shafer, Axe1 Mittelstedt and their colleagues in the Country Studies Branch of the Economics and Statistics Department. 121 INTRODUCTION The past six years have seen the most sustained period of wage and price /- disinflation since the Korean War. Unlike developments after the first oil price shock, when wage growth contributed to high inflation, nominal wage moderation has been an important factor behind the disinflation of the 1980s (Chart A): average nominal pay increases in the seven largest OECD economies accelerated to 10% per cent immediately after the second oil price shock but dropped to below 4per cent by 1986. A number of factors contributed to rapid wage disinflation. The overall stance of macroeconomic, particularly monetary, policies did not accommodate the second large oil price increase. Unemployment rates rose sharply and oil and non;oil commodity prices fell. In addition, there was renewed emphasis on enhancing supply-side flexibility and structural adjustment through microeconomic policies. These policies were advocated partly for the support they could offer to the anti-inflationary stance of macroeconomic policy. These developments suggest a number of questions about microeconomic policy changes and aggregate wage behaviour: i) What have been the important changes since 1 980 in government microeconomic and regulatory policies affecting the labour market, or in wage setting practices; and ii) How have these changes affected aggregate wage developments or the response of wages to economic events? These are the questions addressed in this paper. The paper is organised as follows: Section I presents a cross-country survey of changes in labour market regulatory policies and wage bargaining arrangements. The number of new developments in these areas has been impressive and has generally been consistent with the goal of enhancing the flexibility of labour markets; but for any single country most of the changes have been relatively modest and comparatively recent. In a number of important areas, however, such as increases in social-security costs and the generosity of unemployment insurance systems and minimum wages, trends established in the 1960s and 1970s appear to have been decisively halted, or even reversed. Section II discusses how these microeconomic or institutional changes might affect aggregate wage developments and assesses the quantitative significance of these changes in the context of empirically-estimated wage equations for thirteen QECD economies. There is some evidence that 122 CHART A WAGE GROWTH, INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT - Wage growth, private sector -----------.. Growth of the private consumption deflator Unemployment rate Per cent United States Per cent Per cent Japan Per cent 12 12 30 - - 30 10 8 6 6 15 - :. - 15 4 4 10 - , -.. - 10 --._ ... : * 2 2 5- -5 I -_ -- ~ 0 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 0 0 'lOrJ;721sj7d7~7617~7817~8d81'82r8~8685 Per cent Germany Per cent Per cent France Per cent 12 18 10 16 14 8 12 6 10 8 4 6 2 4 2 70 71 72 73 14 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 0 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 8t 82 83 84 85 Pei cent United Kingdom Per cent Per cent Italy Per cent 30 30 30 r 25 25 20 20 15 15 10 10 5 5 0 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 0 123 CHART A (continued) WAGE GROWTH, INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT Per cent Canada Per cent Per cent Australia Per cent l6 r 1 16 30 r 1 30 Per cent Austria Per cent Per cent Finland Per cent 16 - - 16 25 r 1 25 - 14 - 12 20 - 10 15 10 4- 5 0 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 Per cent Netherlands Per cent Per cent Spain Per cent 16 30 30 14 25 25 12 20 20 10 8 15 15 6 10 10 4 5 5 2 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 0 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 0 Per cent Per cent Per cent =witzedand Per cent - Sweden - - - 14 14 14 14 10 -8 -6 4- 4 A' 2- -2 70 71 12 73 74 75 76 77 78 74 80 81 82 83 84 85 0 124
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.