175x Filetype PDF File size 1.58 MB Source: www.judiciary.uk
The Crown Court Compendium …………………………….. Part II: Sentencing August 2021 Originally written by: Maddison – Ormerod – Tonking – Wait Edited by: Picton – Cooper – Harris Crown Court Compendium Part II August 2021 Introduction The first version of this Sentencing Compendium was published in May 2016. It was written by Sir David Maddison, His Honour Simon Tonking, His Honour John Wait and Professor David Ormerod QC. This latest iteration continues the process of substantially revising and updating that original version. HHJ Jonathan Cooper and Dr Lyndon Harris have taken the lead in carrying out a substantial revision of much of the content working closely with HHJ Martin Picton (lead editor). On this occasion we are enormously indebted to Professor Kathryn Hollingsworth (Newcastle University) and Kate Aubrey-Johnson (Barrister, Garden Court Chambers) both for their textual suggestions addressing sentencing children as well as for Appendix II, which they produced with assistance from Clare Parkinson (Consultant Speech and Language Therapist). The Appendix draws on research conducted by Kathryn Hollingsworth and Helen Stalford (‘“This is a case about you and your future”: Towards Judgments for Children’ (2020) 83(5) Modern Law Review 1030-1058) and additional research carried out by Professor Hollingsworth based on interviews with justice-experienced children and young people (‘Sentencing Remarks for Children: A New Approach’ Newcastle Law School Research Briefing No 14). Thanks are also owed to the children who were interviewed for that research. We consider that Part II has been greatly enhanced by the introduction of a specific focus upon addressing the technical and language challenges of sentencing children. We hope that judges will benefit from the learning provided on this topic and not just when crafting sentencing remarks for children but by way of improving the clarity of sentencing remarks generally. Part II of the Compendium reflects the structure of the Sentencing Code in a way that it is hoped users of this work will find helpful. The Sentencing Compendium is not a text book that is intended might be read from cover to cover. It is a reference work to which judges can turn as needed when dealing with discrete topics. For that reason there is, in places, a degree of repetition. This is deliberate and is done in order to avoid the user of the Compendium having to cross refer to other parts of the book. So far as the example sentencing remarks are concerned they should not be considered as templates and neither should the adoption of them be regarded as a guarantee against a successful appeal in respect of a sentence or a part of one. The examples provide a starting off point should a judge find it helpful to have a form of words to consider as part of the process of settling upon a way of expressing a particular sentence or part of one. As with every aspect of the Compendium we are keen to refine them with every reissue and input from practitioners is both welcomed and encouraged. Passing sentence is one of the most challenging parts of being a judge – not just because of the many technical challenges (now happily somewhat reduced by reason of the implementation of the Sentencing Code) but also because of the importance attached to every word uttered by a judge on the part of all those directly engaged with a particular case, and also the public at large. What we say and how we say it is as important as the result itself, sometimes more so. Particular care is needed when sentencing children and those that are otherwise vulnerable or face Judicial College i Crown Court Compendium Part II August 2021 challenges engaging meaningfully with the criminal justice system – hence the inclusion of material provided by Professor Hollingsworth and Kate Aubrey-Johnson. There are two papers written by Professor Hollingsworth that are hosted on the LMS 1 that are well worth reading . What follows is a foreword from the Chairman of the Sentencing Council written for the December 2020 revision but which is retained on this occasion as the content remains relevant and useful. HHJ Martin Picton, HHJ Jonathan Cooper and Lyndon Harris 31 August 2021 1 Sentencing Remarks for Children: Professor Kathryn Hollingsworth October 2019 and Sentencing Remarks for Children and Young People: Professor Kathryn Hollingsworth 2020. Judicial College ii Crown Court Compendium Part II August 2021 Foreword (to the 2020 edition) by Lord Justice Holroyde, Chairman of the Sentencing Council I am told by the editors that Part II of this Compendium has not previously had its own foreword. I am therefore particularly pleased to have been asked, as Chairman of the Sentencing Council, to provide a foreword for this latest revision. It gives me the opportunity, which I gladly take, to welcome the Sentencing Code. The outstanding work – and stamina - of the Criminal Law team at the Law Commission, under the leadership of David Ormerod, has led to legislation which will simplify and clarify sentencing procedure and will help make sentencing more transparent to the public. Sentencing is a matter of constant, and increasing, public concern, and the Code will benefit us all by making the procedural law more accessible and easier to follow. We have been living in extraordinary times since the last revision of this Part of the Compendium was published in December 2019. The Code comes as very good news at the end of a most difficult year. Old habits sometimes die hard, and we will all need to be vigilant, in the early months of the Code, to avoid falling into the trap of referring to the old statutory provisions instead of the new. This revision of the Compendium will help us to avoid that trap, and it is therefore timely and welcome. We will also need to remember that the Code applies to everyone convicted on or after 1 December 2020 but not to those convicted before that date, even if they are sentenced later. It is very helpful to have that single commencement date, but there will for a time be cases in which judges and recorders are sentencing offenders to whom the old statutory provisions apply. There will also, no doubt, be multi-handed cases in which one defendant has pleaded guilty before 1 December but is not sentenced until others have been convicted after that date, and the judge in those circumstances will need to refer to both the old statutory provisions and the new. If an error is made, but only identified by the court or the parties after the sentencing has been concluded, the power to vary or rescind a sentence under section 385 of the Code (previously s155 of PCC(S)A 2000) should where possible be used, in order to avoid an unnecessary appeal. The Code does not alter any of the sentencing guidelines. Nor does it alter the general duty of the court to follow any relevant guideline unless satisfied that it would be contrary to the interests of justice to do so: see sections 59 and 60 (previously s125 of C&JA 2009). 2 The Sentencing Council launches a new website on 1 December. However, the area housing the guidelines has not been changed, so any links which judges have set up to the guidelines should continue to work. The guidelines themselves continue to provide a link to this Compendium. The legislative references have been updated to provide links to the Code, and the text has where necessary been updated to be 2 https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/ Judicial College iii
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.