jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Beta Mimetic For Ppi | Ilmu Kesehatan


 273x       Tipe PDF       Ukuran file 0.31 MB    


File: Beta Mimetic For Ppi | Ilmu Kesehatan
oral betamimetics for maintenance therapy after threatened pretermlabour review doddjm crowtherca daremr middletonp thisisareprintofacochranereview preparedandmaintained bythecochranecollaborationandpublishedinthecochranelibrary 2007 issue 2 http www thecochranelibrary com oral betamimetics for maintenance therapy after threatened ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Diposting 01 Jul 2022 | 3 thn lalu
Berikut sebagian tangkapan teks file ini.
Geser ke kiri pada layar.
                       Oral betamimetics for maintenance therapy after threatened
                                                               pretermlabour(Review)
                                                       DoddJM,CrowtherCA,DareMR,MiddletonP
                       ThisisareprintofaCochranereview,preparedandmaintained byTheCochraneCollaborationandpublishedinTheCochraneLibrary
                       2007, Issue 2
                                                                        http://www.thecochranelibrary.com
                       Oral betamimetics for maintenance therapy after threatened preterm labour (Review)                                                   1
                       Copyright©2007 The CochraneCollaboration.Published byJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd
                                                                                                        TABLE OF CONTENTS
                                  ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                     1
                                  PLAINLANGUAGESUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                         1
                                  BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                       2
                                  OBJECTIVES                  .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .             2
                                  CRITERIAFORCONSIDERINGSTUDIESFORTHISREVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                           2
                                  SEARCHMETHODSFORIDENTIFICATIONOFSTUDIES                                                                    .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .             3
                                  METHODSOFTHEREVIEW . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                         3
                                  DESCRIPTIONOFSTUDIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                       4
                                  METHODOLOGICALQUALITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                        4
                                  RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                    4
                                  DISCUSSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                     6
                                  AUTHORS’CONCLUSIONS                                    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .             6
                                  POTENTIALCONFLICTOFINTEREST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                        7
                                  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS                                  .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .             7
                                  SOURCESOFSUPPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                       7
                                  REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                     7
                                  TABLES             .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            10
                                          Characteristics of included studies                    .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            10
                                          Characteristics of excluded studies                    .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            14
                                  ANALYSES                .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            15
                                          Comparison 01. Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (primary outcomes)                                                     .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            15
                                          Comparison 02. Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (infant outcomes)                                                 .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            16
                                          Comparison 03. Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (maternal outcomes)                                                    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            16
                                          Comparison 04. Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (preterm birth and hospital admissions)                                                               .   .   .    .   .    .            16
                                          Comparison 05. Terbutaline versus indomethacin (primary outcomes)                                                .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            16
                                          Comparison 06. Terbutaline versus indomethacin (infant outcomes)                                            .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            16
                                          Comparison 07. Terbutaline versus indomethacin (maternal outcomes)                                               .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            17
                                          Comparison 08. Terbutaline versus indomethacin (preterm birth and hospital admissions)                                                         .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            17
                                          Comparison 09. Terbutaline versus ritodrine (primary outcomes)                                          .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            17
                                          Comparison 10. Terbutaline versus ritodrine (infant outcomes) .                                         .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            17
                                          Comparison 11. Terbutaline versus ritodrine (maternal outcomes)                                         .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            17
                                          Comparison 12. Terbutaline versus ritodrine (preterm birth and hospital admissions)                                                    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            17
                                          Comparison 13. Betamimetic versus magnesium (primary outcomes) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                18
                                          Comparison 14. Betamimetic versus magnesium (infant outcomes)                                               .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            18
                                          Comparison 15. Betamimetic versus magnesium (maternal outcomes)                                                  .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            18
                                          Comparison 16. Betamimetic versus magnesium (preterm birth and hospital admissions)                                                        .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            18
                                  INDEXTERMS                       .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            18
                                  COVERSHEET                       .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .            18
                                  GRAPHSANDOTHERTABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .                                                                                                                        20
                                          Analysis 01.03. Comparison 01 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (primary outcomes), Outcome 03 Neonatal                                                                                   20
                                                  intensive care unit admission                     .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .
                                          Analysis 01.04. Comparison 01 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (primary outcomes), Outcome 04 Perinatal                                                                                  20
                                                  mortality          .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .
                                          Analysis 02.01. Comparison 02 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (infant outcomes), Outcome 01 Preterm birth                                                                               21
                                                  (< 37 weeks)            .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .    .   .
                                          Analysis 02.02. Comparison 02 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (infant outcomes), Outcome 02 Birthweight                                                                                 22
                                          Analysis 02.03. Comparison 02 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (infant outcomes), Outcome 03 Respiratory                                                                                 23
                                                  distress syndrome               .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .    .   .
                                          Analysis 02.04. Comparison 02 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (infant outcomes), Outcome 04 Necrotising                                                                                 24
                                                  enterocolitis           .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .   .    .   .    .   .    .   .
                                  Oral betamimetics for maintenance therapy after threatened preterm labour (Review)                                                                                                                         i
                                  Copyright©2007 The CochraneCollaboration.Published byJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd
                            Analysis 02.05. Comparison 02 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (infant outcomes), Outcome 05                           24
                                 Intraventricular haemorrhage     .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 02.06. Comparison 02 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (infant outcomes), Outcome 06 Neonatal                  25
                                 jaundice .   .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 03.01. Comparison 03 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (maternal outcomes), Outcome 01 Side-effects            25
                                 sufficient to stop therapy  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 03.02. Comparison 03 Betamimeticversus placebo/no treatment(maternaloutcomes), Outcome02Tachycardia                  26
                            Analysis 03.03. Comparison 03 Betamimeticversusplacebo/no treatment(maternaloutcomes), Outcome03Tachypnoea                    26
                            Analysis 03.04. Comparison 03 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (maternal outcomes), Outcome 04                         27
                                 Hypotension     .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 03.05. Comparison 03 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (maternal outcomes), Outcome 05 Nausea                  27
                            Analysis 03.06. Comparison 03 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (maternal outcomes), Outcome 06 Vomiting                28
                            Analysis 03.07. Comparison 03 Betamimeticversus placebo/no treatment (maternaloutcomes), Outcome07 Palpitations               28
                            Analysis 03.08. Comparison 03 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (maternal outcomes), Outcome 08 Headache                29
                            Analysis 04.01. Comparison 04 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (preterm birth and hospital admissions),                29
                                 Outcome01Pretermbirth within 24 hours           .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 04.02. Comparison 04 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (preterm birth and hospital admissions),                30
                                 Outcome02Pretermbirth within 48 hours           .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 04.03. Comparison 04 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (preterm birth and hospital admissions),                30
                                 Outcome03Pretermbirth within 1 week          .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 04.04. Comparison 04 Betamimetic versus placebo/no treatment (preterm birth and hospital admissions),                31
                                 Outcome04Maternal antenatal readmission to hospital        .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 05.01. Comparison 05 Terbutaline versus indomethacin (primary outcomes), Outcome 01 Very preterm birth               31
                                 (< 34 weeks)    .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 05.02. Comparison 05 Terbutaline versus indomethacin (primary outcomes), Outcome 02 Neonatal mortality               32
                            Analysis 06.01. Comparison 06 Terbutaline versus indomethacin (infant outcomes), Outcome 01 Birthweight            .  .       32
                            Analysis 06.02. Comparison 06 Terbutaline versus indomethacin (infant outcomes), Outcome 02 Required mechanical               33
                                 ventilation  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 06.03. Comparison 06 Terbutaline versus indomethacin (infant outcomes), Outcome 03 Days stay in neonatal             33
                                 intensive care unit   .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 06.04. Comparison 06 Terbutaline versus indomethacin (infant outcomes), Outcome 04 Intraventricular                  34
                                 haemorrhage     .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 07.01. Comparison 07 Terbutaline versus indomethacin (maternal outcomes), Outcome 01 Side-effects                    34
                                 sufficient to stop therapy  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 08.01. Comparison 08 Terbutaline versus indomethacin (preterm birth and hospital admissions), Outcome 01             35
                                 Preterm birth .    .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 08.02. Comparison 08 Terbutaline versus indomethacin (preterm birth and hospital admissions), Outcome 02             35
                                 Maternal antenatal readmission to hospital .    .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 09.01. Comparison 09 Terbutaline versus ritodrine (primary outcomes), Outcome 01 Very preterm birth (less            36
                                 than 34 weeks)     .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 10.01. Comparison 10 Terbutaline versus ritodrine (infant outcomes), Outcome 01 Preterm birth (< 37 weeks)           36
                            Analysis 10.02. Comparison 10 Terbutaline versus ritodrine (infant outcomes), Outcome 02 Mean birthweight          .  .       37
                            Analysis 10.03. Comparison 10 Terbutaline versus ritodrine (infant outcomes), Outcome 03 Hyperbilirubinaemia                  37
                                 (neonatal jaundice requiring phototherapy)      .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 11.01. Comparison 11 Terbutaline versus ritodrine (maternal outcomes), Outcome 01 Tachycardia          .  .  .       38
                            Analysis 11.02. Comparison 11 Terbutaline versus ritodrine (maternal outcomes), Outcome 02 Tachypnoea           .  .  .       38
                            Analysis 11.03. Comparison 11 Terbutaline versus ritodrine (maternal outcomes), Outcome 03 Nausea/vomiting            .       39
                            Analysis 12.01. Comparison 12 Terbutaline versus ritodrine (preterm birth and hospital admissions), Outcome 01                39
                                 Maternal antenatal readmission to hospital .    .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 13.01. Comparison 13 Betamimetic versus magnesium (primary outcomes), Outcome 01 Neonatal intensive                  40
                                 care unit admisssion     . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .  .
                            Analysis 13.02. Comparison 13 Betamimetic versus magnesium (primary outcomes), Outcome 02 Perinatal mortality                 40
                       Oral betamimetics for maintenance therapy after threatened preterm labour (Review)                                                   ii
                       Copyright©2007 The CochraneCollaboration.Published byJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd
                           Analysis 14.01. Comparison 14 Betamimetic versus magnesium (infant outcomes), Outcome 01 Preterm birth (< 37               41
                                weeks)    .  . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .
                           Analysis 14.02. Comparison 14 Betamimetic versus magnesium (infant outcomes), Outcome 02 Birthweight         .  .  .       42
                           Analysis 14.03. Comparison 14 Betamimetic versus magnesium (infant outcomes), Outcome 03 Respiratory distress              42
                                syndrome     . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .
                           Analysis 14.04. Comparison 14 Betamimetic versus magnesium (infant outcomes), Outcome 04 Intraventricular                  43
                                haemorrhage    .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .
                           Analysis 14.05. Comparison 14 Betamimetic versus magnesium (infant outcomes), Outcome 05 Neonatal jaundice .               43
                           Analysis 15.01. Comparison 15 Betamimetic versus magnesium (maternal outcomes), Outcome 01 Side-effects sufficient          44
                                to stop medication   .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .
                           Analysis 15.02. Comparison 15 Betamimetic versus magnesium (maternal outcomes), Outcome 02 Tachycardia/                    45
                                palpitations   .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .
                           Analysis 15.03. Comparison 15 Betamimetic versus magnesium (maternal outcomes), Outcome 03 Tachypnoea           .  .       45
                           Analysis 15.04. Comparison 15 Betamimetic versus magnesium (maternal outcomes), Outcome 04 Nausea .          .  .  .       46
                           Analysis 15.05. Comparison 15 Betamimetic versus magnesium (maternal outcomes), Outcome 05 Vomiting . . .                  47
                           Analysis 15.06. Comparison 15 Betamimetic versus magnesium (maternal outcomes), Outcome 06 Chest pain           .  .       47
                           Analysis 16.01. Comparison 16 Betamimetic versus magnesium (preterm birth and hospital admissions), Outcome 01             48
                                Maternal antenatal readmission to hospital .  .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  . .  .  .  .  .  .
                      Oral betamimetics for maintenance therapy after threatened preterm labour (Review)                                               iii
                      Copyright©2007 The CochraneCollaboration.Published byJohn Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Kata-kata yang terdapat di dalam file ini mungkin membantu anda melihat apakah file ini sesuai dengan yang dicari :

...Oral betamimetics for maintenance therapy after threatened pretermlabour review doddjm crowtherca daremr middletonp thisisareprintofacochranereview preparedandmaintained bythecochranecollaborationandpublishedinthecochranelibrary issue http www thecochranelibrary com preterm labour copyright the cochranecollaboration published byjohn wiley sons ltd table of contents abstract plainlanguagesummary background objectives criteriaforconsideringstudiesforthisreview searchmethodsforidentificationofstudies methodsofthereview descriptionofstudies methodologicalquality results discussion authors conclusions potentialconflictofinterest acknowledgements sourcesofsupport references tables characteristics included studies excluded analyses comparison betamimetic versus placebo no treatment primary outcomes infant maternal birth and hospital admissions terbutaline indomethacin ritodrine magnesium indexterms coversheet...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.