153x Filetype PDF File size 2.55 MB Source: pure.qub.ac.uk
Factor structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire in UK Armed Forces veterans residing in Northern Ireland Armour, C., Robinson, M., & Ross, J. (2021). Factor structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire in UK Armed Forces veterans residing in Northern Ireland. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12(1), [1924954]. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1924954 Published in: European Journal of Psychotraumatology Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2021 the authors. This is an open access Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction for non-commercial purposes, provided the author and source are cited. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact openaccess@qub.ac.uk. Download date:06. Oct. 2022 European Journal of Psychotraumatology ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/zept20 Factor structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire in UK Armed Forces veterans residing in Northern Ireland Cherie Armour, Martin Robinson & Jana Ross To cite this article: Cherie Armour, Martin Robinson & Jana Ross (2021) Factor structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire in UK Armed Forces veterans residing in Northern Ireland, European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 12:1, 1924954, DOI: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1924954 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1924954 © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Published online: 17 Jun 2021. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=zept20 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY 2021, VOL. 12, 1924954 https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.1924954 BASIC RESEARCH ARTICLE Factor structure of the International Trauma Questionnaire in UK Armed Forces veterans residing in Northern Ireland Cherie Armour , Martin Robinson and Jana Ross Stress Trauma and Related Conditions (STARC) Research Lab, School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Background: Complex Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (C-PTSD) was recently included in the Received 7 January 2021 revised International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) by the World Health Organization Revised 12 April 2021 (WHO, 2018). C-PTSD is a new trauma related disorder which may develop after prolonged Accepted 22 April 2021 and multiple exposures to trauma. It is a sister disorder of PTSD and is further characterized by KEYWORDS symptomatology of disorganized self-organization (DSO). To qualify for the diagnosis, indivi- Complex PTSD; factor duals must first meet the diagnostic criteria for PTSD, then report DSO symptoms and func- analysis; veterans; military; tional impairment. A body of work is emerging which has focused on the underlying UK Armed Forces dimensionality of C-PTSD across both adult and more recently adolescent populations from PALABRAS CLAVE differing index trauma groups and from across several nations and cultures. However, few TEPT Complejo; Análisis studies have been conducted in populations exposed to combat trauma despite the obvious Factorial; veteranos; Milicia; prolonged and multiple nature of their trauma histories. Fuerzas Armadas del Reino Objective: To contribute to emerging evidence of the factor structure of ICD-11 C-PTSD in Unido a novel population. Methods: This is the first factor analytic study to explore C-PTSD in a sample of UK Armed 关键词 Forces veterans residing in Northern Ireland (N = 732). C-PTSD was measured via the ITQ and 复杂性PTSD; 因子分析; 退 we utilized CFA to assess the fit of 7 competing models. 伍军人; 军队; 英国武装部 Results: Based on established CFA fit indices, a correlated, first order, 6-factor model of C-PTSD, 队 representing 3 PTSD and 3 DSO symptom groupings, was deemed to provide superior fit to the HIGHLIGHTS data compared to 6 alternative C-PTSD models. The superiority of the model was further • This is the first factor ana- supported by statistical comparisons of competing C-PTSD models. All factor loadings (0.866–- lytic study to explore 0.998) and inter-factor correlations (.746-.975) of the optimally fitting model were statistically C-PTSD in a sample of UK significant and high. Armed Forces veterans Conclusion: These results provide support for the construct validity of ICD-11 C-PTSD in residing in Northern a unique sample of Armed Forces veterans residing in Northern Ireland. Ireland. • A correlated, first order, 6-factor model of C-PTSD, was deemed to provide Estructura Factorial del Cuestionario Internacional de Trauma en superior fit to the data Veteranos de las Fuerzas Armadas del Reino Unido que residen en compared to 6 alternative C-PTSD models. Irlanda del Norte • These results provide sup- Antecedentes: El Trastorno de Estrés Postraumático Complejo (TEPT-C) fue recientemente port for the construct incluido en la revisión de la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades (CIE-11) por la validity of ICD-11 C-PTSD. Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS, 2018). EL TEPT-C es un nuevo trastorno relacio- nado con el trauma que puede desarrollarse posterior a exposición prolongada y múltiple a traumas. Es un trastorno hermano del TEPT, y se caracteriza además por su sintomatología de desorden en la auto-organización (DSO por sus siglas en inglés). Para calificar para este diagnóstico, los individuos deben cumplir primero con criterios para TEPT, y luego reportar síntomas de DSO y deterioro funcional. Un cúmulo de trabajo está emergiendo, y se ha concentrado en la dimensionalidad subyacente del TEPT-C en poblaciones de adultos y más recientemente en adolescentes, diferenciándolas de grupos de trauma índice y en numerosas naciones y culturas. Sin embargo, se han realizado pocos estudios en poblaciones expuestas a trauma de combate pese a la naturaleza obviamente prolongada y múltiple de sus historias de trauma. Objetivo: Contribuir a la evidencia emergente de la estructura factorial del TEPT-C de la CIE-11 en una población nueva. Métodos: Este es el primer estudio analítico factorial en explorar el TEPT-C en una muestra de Veteranos de las Fuerzas Armadas del Reino Unido que residen en Irlanda del Norte (N=732). El TEPT-C fue medido mediante el ITQ (Cuestionario Internacional de Trauma por sus siglas en inglés) y se utilizó análisis factorial confirmatorio (CFA por sus siglas en inglés) para evaluar el ajuste de 7 modelos en competencia. Resultados: Basado en lo establecido por los índices de ajustes, un modelo de 6 factores correlacionado y de primer orden representando 3 agrupaciones de síntomas de TEPT y 3 CONTACT Cherie Armour c.armour@qub.ac.uk School of Psychology, Queen’s University Belfast, David Keir Building, 18-30 Malone Road, Belfast BT9 5BN, Northern Ireland, UK © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 2 C. ARMOUR ET AL. agrupaciones de síntomas de DSO, fue encontrado que probó un ajuste superior a los datos comparado con los 6 modelos alternativos de TEP-C. La superioridad del modelo fue respal- dada además por comparación estadística de los modelos en competencia de TEPT-C. Todas las cargas factoriales (0.866-0.998) y correlaciones inter-factoriales (.746-.975) del modelo con ajuste óptimo fueron estadísticamente significativas y altas. Conclusión: Estos resultados aportan sustento a la validez del constructo TEPT-C del CIE-11 en una muestra única de veteranos de las Fuerzas Armadas que residen en Irlanda del Norte 居住在北爱尔兰的英国武装部队退伍军人中国际创伤问卷的因子结构 背景: 世界卫生组织 (WHO, 2018) 最近将复杂性创伤后应激障碍 (C-PTSD) 纳入了修订版《国 际疾病分类》 (ICD-11) ° C-PTSD是一种新的创伤相关疾病, 可能在长期和多次创伤暴露后发 展° 它是PTSD的姐妹疾病, 其特征还在于自组织障碍 (DSO) 的症候学° 要满足诊断条件, 个人 必须首先满足PTSD的诊断标准, 然后报告DSO症状和功能损伤 大量工作集中在来自不同指 ° 数创伤组以及来自不同国家和文化的成年群体和更近期的青少年群体中, C-PTSD的潜在维 度 但是, 但很少有研究在遭受战争创伤的群体中进行, 尽管其创伤史具有明显的长期性和 ° 多重性, ° 目的: 为一个新群体中ICD-11 C-PTSD因子结构的新兴证据做出贡献° 方法: 这是第一个对居住在北爱尔兰 (N = 732) 的英国武装部队退伍军人样本中C-PTSD进行 因子分析的研究 C-PTSD由ITQ测量, 我们利用CFA评估了7种竞争模型的拟合度 ° ° 结果: 根据已确立的CFA拟合指数, 与6个替代C-PTSD模型相比, 表征3个PTSD和3个DSO症状 组合的C-PTSD的相关一阶6因子模型被认为对数据拟合度更高 竞争性C-PTSD模型的统计比 ° 较进一步支持了该模型的优越性 最佳拟合模型的所有因子负荷 (0.866-0.998) 和因子间相 ° 关 (.746-.975) 在统计上均显著且很高 ° 结论: 这些结果为居住于北爱尔兰的武装部队退伍军人的独特样本中ICD-11 C-PTSD的构建 效度提供了支持 ° 1. Introduction symptoms of PTSD and DSO must correspond to The 11th revision of the International Classification of functional impairment (WHO, 2018). Notably, the Disease (ICD-11; World Health Organisation [WHO], most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical 2018) included a new chapter titled ‘Disorders Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5; American Specifically Associated with Stress’. Within this chapter Psychiatric Association, 2013) chose not to include was the inclusion of Complex Post-traumatic Stress C-PTSD as a new disorder within its nomenclature Disorder (C-PTSD). The concept of C-PTSD is given view that C-PTSD as a concept lacked valid and regarded as owing its origins to the seminal work of reliable assessments (at the time the DSM-5 was being Judith Herman (1992). Herman posited that PTSD was revised) and based on the strict criteria required for not sufficient in its nosology to capture the true multi- the inclusion of any additional disorders (Friedman, faceted symptomatology expressed by individuals who 2013; Resick et al., 2012). had experienced prolonged and sustained traumatic life Mirroring the factor analytic research that has events; particularly those which had occurred in early focused on the underlying dimensionality of PTSD in and formative years. The development of C-PTSD in the DSM (see Armour, Mullerova, & Elhai, 2016), response to prolonged and multiple traumatic events albeit to a much lesser extent, there has been a recent has been further supported in recent years (Brewin academic focus on identifying which factor analytic et al., 2017; Cloitre et al., 2019). Hyland, Karatzias, model of C-PTSD best represents the constructs Shevlin, Cloitre, and Ben-Ezra (2020) in comparing dimensionality (Brewin et al., 2017; Gilbar, Hyland, PTSD and C-PTSD rates across studies using data Cloitre, & Dekel, 2018; Hyland, Shevlin, Brewin, et al., from several countries, concluded that CPTSD may 2017; Hyland et al., 2016; Kazlauskas et al., 2020; occur as frequently (e.g. in US & Ireland) or indeed to Knefel & Lueger-Schuster, 2013; Mordeno, Nalipay, a greater extent than PTSD (e.g. in the UK). & Mordeno, 2019; Nickerson et al., 2016; Shevlin C-PTSD, as specified in ICD-11, requires that et al., 2018). Within the extant literature several com- trauma exposed individuals first meet the diagnostic peting models have been specified and estimated ran- criteria for PTSD (characterized in ICD-11 by three ging from a unidimensional model through to a model symptom groupings of Re-experiencing, Avoidance, comprising 7 latent factors. The sum of models speci- and a Heightened Sense of Threat), in addition to fied also comprise of a mixture of first and second reporting at least one symptom from the three symp- order models (see Kazlauskas et al., 2020; Mordeno tom groups of Disturbances in Self-Organization et al., 2019). (DSO – comprising symptom groupings of Affective Noting that the ICD-11 is utilized worldwide (and Dysregulation, Negative Self-Concept, and Difficulties far more extensively than the DSM nomenclature) and in Sustaining Interpersonal Relationships). Both the is specifically designed to be applicable and valid
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.