jagomart
digital resources
picture1_Medical Textbooks Pdf 115235 | Guidelines For Authors Of Medical Textbooks


 177x       Filetype PDF       File size 0.26 MB       Source: ari.hms.harvard.edu


File: Medical Textbooks Pdf 115235 | Guidelines For Authors Of Medical Textbooks
introduction these guidelines outline principles that should be followed at harvard medical school in the writing and editing of multi authored multi edited medical textbooks in which successive editions are ...

icon picture PDF Filetype PDF | Posted on 03 Oct 2022 | 3 years ago
Partial capture of text on file.
        INTRODUCTION 
        These guidelines outline principles that should be followed at Harvard Medical School in the writing 
        and editing of multi-authored, multi-edited medical textbooks in which successive editions are 
        customarily revised. It appears that there are no commonly accepted standards in the field of 
        medical textbook writing, editing, and revising in regard to acknowledging the source of material 
        retained from prior editions. 
        The textbook guidelines that follow are intended as a supplement to the Guidelines for Investigators 
        in Scientific Research, issued in February 1988, which include principles for authorship practices in 
        scientific papers. These guidelines are intended to provide general principles for behavior and not to 
        be absolute rules. 
        RECOMMENDATIONS: 
          1.  Although shared with the current authors of a textbook, the ultimate responsibility for 
           selection of an appropriate form of attribution remains within the discretion of the editor. 
          2.  Whenever plans are being made to revise a textbook, it is the responsibility of the editor to 
           notify each contributor to the prior edition and establish the nature and extent of the prior 
           contribution. Such notice should be made whether or not the individual's participation will 
           be sought for the revised edition. The notice should include any expected retention of the 
           prior contributor's work in the new edition and the anticipated attribution, if any, of the 
           prior contributor. Such notice serves not only as an act of courtesy and collegiality but also 
           helps prevent misunderstandings about the role of the individual in both the former and the 
           new editions. 
          3.  Attribution of contributions from a prior edition of a textbook should be acknowledged by 
           name, title and address when the prior contribution to the current work is identifiable. 
           Appropriate acknowledgment can usually be made in the form of a footnote, but if the 
           previous author actually participated in the rewriting or attendant scholarship involved in 
           the preparation of the current edition or if the contribution of the previous author accounts 
           for a significant identifiable portion of the current edition, the editor should include the prior 
           contributor as an author of the current edition. 
          4.  Editors of medical textbooks are responsible for maintaining academic standards of 
           scholarship and proper attribution in accordance with these guidelines despite the fact that 
           the publisher rather than the editor or author owns the copyright. The responsibility should 
           not be abdicated to the publisher. Editors should reach a prior agreement with the publisher 
           that academic standards of attribution will be followed. 
        Adopted on September 22, 1993 
         
The words contained in this file might help you see if this file matches what you are looking for:

...Introduction these guidelines outline principles that should be followed at harvard medical school in the writing and editing of multi authored edited textbooks which successive editions are customarily revised it appears there no commonly accepted standards field textbook revising regard to acknowledging source material retained from prior follow intended as a supplement for investigators scientific research issued february include authorship practices papers provide general behavior not absolute rules recommendations although shared with current authors ultimate responsibility selection an appropriate form attribution remains within discretion editor whenever plans being made revise is notify each contributor edition establish nature extent contribution such notice whether or individual s participation will sought any expected retention work new anticipated if serves only act courtesy collegiality but also helps prevent misunderstandings about role both former contributions acknowled...

no reviews yet
Please Login to review.