299x Filetype PDF File size 3.04 MB Source: openaccess.city.ac.uk
A Synthesis of the Reflective and Scientific
Counselling Psychologist Practitioner:
Dynamics in Research, Practice, and Clinical
Supervision
Portfolio for the Professional
Doctorate in Counselling
Psychology (DPsych)
Alison E Walne
City University
Department of Psychology
Submitted July 2015
1
THE FOLLOWING PARTS OF THIS THESIS HAVE BEEN
REDACTED FOR DATA PROTECTION REASONS:
pp 171-172:
Appendix 4. Letter authorising research.
pp 248-270:
Section C: Case Study. The emotional effects of Anxiety: an Integrative
Therapeutic approach.
THE FOLLOWING PART OF THIS THESIS HAS BEEN
REDACTED FOR COPYRIGHT REASONS:
p247:
Appendix 27: AMSTAR Criteria
http://www.nccmt.ca/registry/view/eng/97.html
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements....................................................................................................8
City University Declaration......................................................................................9
PART A: PREFACE..............................................................................................................10
References.................................................................................................................14
PART B: THE RESEARCH.................................................................................................16
Abstract....................................................................................................................17
1. Chapter 1: Literature Review................................................................................18
1.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................18
1.2 The Therapeutic Relationship...................................................................................20
1.3 Conceptualisation of the Therapeutic Alliance.........................................................23
1.4 Therapeutic Alliance and Outcome...........................................................................24
1.5 Therapeutic Alliance Scales and Factors Currently Involved...................................29
1.6 Rating the Therapeutic Alliance................................................................................34
1.7 Therapist Characteristics and Relational Factors in the Therapeutic Alliance.........42
1.8 Evolution of the Therapeutic Alliance......................................................................45
1.9 Do We Need the Therapeutic Alliance and Therapeutic Alliance Measurement?...47
1.10 Summary of the Literature Review...........................................................................47
1.2.1 Rationale for the Study..............................................................................................49
1.2.2 Relevance to Counselling Psychology......................................................................54
1.2 3 Ethical Considerations..............................................................................................55
1.2.4 Reflexivity.................................................................................................................56
1.2.5 Personal Reflexivity..................................................................................................57
1.2.6 Epistemological Reflexivity......................................................................................59
1.3.1 Research Aims..........................................................................................................60
1.3.2 Research Objectives..................................................................................................60
1.3.3 Research Questions...................................................................................................60
1.3.4 Pilot Study.................................................................................................................60
2. Chapter 2: Methodology.........................................................................................61
2.1 Research Design........................................................................................................61
2.1.2 Phase One Overview: Focus Group..........................................................................61
2.1.3 Phase Two Overview: Panel Judges.........................................................................62
2.1.4 Phase Three Overview: Online Survey.....................................................................62
2.2 Participants................................................................................................................63
Demographics Focus Group (Table 1)......................................................................63
Demographics Panel Judges (Table 2)......................................................................64
2.2 1 Inclusion Criteria: Phase One and Two - Focus Group and Panel Judges................65
2
2.2.2 Exclusion Criteria: Phase One and Two - Focus Group and Panel Judges...............65
2.2.3 Inclusion Criteria: Phase Three - Online Survey......................................................65
2.2.4 Exclusion Criteria: Phase Three - Online Survey.....................................................65
2.2.5 Recruitment...............................................................................................................65
2.2.6 Sample Size...............................................................................................................66
2.2.7 Procedure...................................................................................................................66
2.2.8 Materials....................................................................................................................70
2.3 Data Analysis............................................................................................................71
2.3.1 Analysis Overview....................................................................................................71
2.3.2 Phase One: Rationale for a Focus Group Interview..................................................73
2.3.3 Phase One: Rationale for a Focus Group – Use of Two Measures...........................73
2.3.4 Phase One: Rationale for a Focus Group Manual Analysis .....................................74
2.3.5 Phase One: Rationale for a Focus Group Computer Qualitative Content Analysis..74
2.3.6 Phase One: Rationale for a Focus Group NVivo 10: Computer Coding Analysis...75
2.3.7 Phase One: Focus Group Transcript Analysis: Initial Statements............................75
2.3.8 Phase Two: Rationale for a Hybrid Thurstone-Likert Model...................................77
2.3.9 Phase Two: Rationale for Thurstone Scaling and Panel Judges...............................77
2.3.10 Phase Two: Thurstone Scaling: Analysis Process....................................................78
2.3.11 Phase Three-Part A: Rationale for Likert-Type Scaling: Online Survey
Respondents..............................................................................................................79
2.3.12 Phase Three-Part A: Likert-Type Scaling: Analysis Process....................................79
2.3.13 Phase Three-Part B: Exploratory Factor Analysis: Analysis Process.......................79
3. C h a p t e r 3 : R e s u l t s .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .....................................................................................80
3.1 Results Overview.....................................................................................................80
3.1.1 Qualitative Content Analysis Focus Group Manual Coding.....................................81
3.1.2 What Is The Therapeutic Alliance?...........................................................................82
3.1.3 When Does The Therapeutic Alliance Start?............................................................83
3.1.4 How Do Therapists Develop The Therapeutic Alliance?.........................................83
3.1.5 How Do Therapists Maintain The Therapeutic Alliance?........................................84
3.1.6 Is The Therapeutic Alliance Measurable?.................................................................85
3.1.7 Qualitative Content Analysis – Focus Group: NVivo 10 Coding.............................86
3.1.8 Word Frequency Count Process: NVivo 10..............................................................88
3.2 Panel Judges..............................................................................................................89
3.3 Quantitative Results Overview..............................................................................92
3.3.1 Exploratory Factor Analysis Overview.....................................................................94
3.3.2 Descriptive Statistics.................................................................................................95
3.3.3 Exploratory Factor Analysis Results: Q1-22............................................................97
3.3.4 Varimax Orthogonal Rotation.................................................................................102
3.3.5 Direct Oblimin Rotation..........................................................................................106
3.3.6 Exploratory Factor Analysis Results: Q23-27........................................................109
3.3.7 Reliability................................................................................................................112
4. Chapter 4: Discussion...........................................................................................114
4.1 Study Overview.......................................................................................................114
4.2 Participant Demographics.......................................................................................116
3
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.