152x Filetype PDF File size 0.23 MB Source: antoniozadra.com
ARTICLE IN PRESS 1 Imagery Rehearsal 2 3 Therapy: Principles 4 5 andPractice 6 ½Q2 a, b ½Q3 Barry Krakow, MD *, Antonio Zadra, PhD ½Q4 KEYWORDS 7 Dreaming Dream frequency Dream content 8 Nightmares Trauma Posttraumatic dreams 49 9 10 50 11 51 12 52 13 Manyclinicians in sleep medicine, psychiatry, and frequency, including maintenance of changes at 53 PROOF psychology remain unaware of the suffering and long-term follow-up.6–9 IRT effectively relieves 14 54 15 distress caused by chronic nightmares. This lack idiopathic, recurrent, and PTSD-related forms of 55 of awareness extends to the therapeutic tools that nightmares.6,8,10,11 In these same studies, a rela- 56 16 effectively reduce or eliminate the problem. Many tively consistent pattern emerged of decreased 17 57 18 nonpharmacologic techniques have been psychiatric distress including anxiety, depression, 58 19 proposed to treat posttraumatic stress disorder or PTSD symptoms, following successful night- 59 20 (PTSD)–related or idiopathic nightmares, including mare treatment. Of the several hundred partici- 60 21 hypnosis, lucid dreaming, eye movement desensi- pants and patients, with and without PTSD, 61 22 tization and reprocessing, desensitization, and treated in research protocols with IRT, approxi- 62 23 imagery rehearsal therapy (IRT). However, only mately 70% reported clinically meaningful 63 24 desensitization and IRT have been the objects of improvements in nightmare frequency. However, 64 25 controlled studies, and IRT has received the most anecdotal observations among those individuals 65 26 empiricalsupport.Thisarticlehighlightskeyprinci- who reported regular use of the technique for 2 66 27 ples behind this technique and the practice to 4 weeks indicate that significant clinical change 67 28 methodsusedtoapplyitbypresentinganabridged occurred in greater than 90% of patients. 68 1 12–17 29 and updated version of an earlier work. Further Variations exist in the application of IRT and 69 30 resources are also available to readers interested IRT has also been adapted for use in children 70 2,3 18,19 31 in additional material on the clinical use of IRT. suffering from nighttimes. The distinguishing 71 32 ForthosepatientsinwhomIRTmaybeimpractical features between these variations generally revolve 72 33 or counterproductive, pharmacotherapy (eg, pra- around the degree of exposure used during treat- 73 34 zosin, a central a-1 adrenoreceptor blocker) may ment sessions and/or the specific application of 74 35 be a useful alternative therapeutic option for the technique during the sessions. This article 75 PTSD-related nightmares.4,5 Readers interested focusesonIRTasdevelopedbyKellner,Neidhardt, 76 36 in pharmacologic approaches to nightmare treat- Krakow, and Hollifield at the University of New 37 77 38 ment and the issue of drug-induced nightmares MexicoSchoolofMedicine(1988–1999)andatthe 78 39 are referred to the article by Pagel in this issue. Sleep&HumanHealthInstitute(2000topresent). 79 40 80 41 CONTROLLED TREATMENT STUDIES THERAPEUTIC COMPONENTS OF IRT UNCORRECTED 42 In the last 20 years, IRT has been tested repeat- Current Practice 43 edly in various samples and has shown efficacy IRT can be conceptualized as a 2-component 44 in reducing nightmare distress and nightmare therapeutic process, each of which targets 45 46 a Maimonides Sleep Arts & Sciences, Ltd., Maimonides International Nightmare Treatment, Sleep & Human Health Institute, 6739 Academy NE, Suite 380, Albuquerque, NM 87109, USA b ´ ´ Department of Psychology, Universite de Montreal, C.P. 6128, succ. Centre-ville, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, ½Q5 H3C 3J7 47 * Corresponding author. 48 E-mail address: bkrakow@sleeptreatment.com (B. Krakow). theclinics.com Sleep Med Clin - (2010) -–- doi:10.1016/j.jsmc.2010.01.004 sleep. 1556-407X/10/$ – see front matter ª 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. CSLP262_proof 9 February 2010 7:50 pm ARTICLE IN PRESS 2 Krakow&Zadra 81 adistinctyetoverlappingprobleminthenightmare Box 1 138 82 sufferer. The first component is an educational/ Overview of the main components in each 139 83 cognitive restructuring element, focused on 140 of the 4 IRTsessions ½Q8 84 helping the nightmare sufferer to consider their 141 85 disturbing dreams as a learned sleep disorder, Session 1 142 86 similar to psychophysiologic insomnia. The Reiterating that the group will not discuss 143 87 second component is an imagery education/ past traumatic events or traumatic content 144 88 training element, which teaches patients who of nightmares 145 89 have nightmares about the nature of human Addressing treatment credibility 146 90 imagery and how to implement a specific set of Hownightmares can lead to insomnia 147 91 imagery steps to decrease nightmares. IRT can Hownightmarespassfromanacutephaseto 148 92 bedeliveredindividually or in groups, but for either a chronic disorder 149 93 scenario the same progression of treatment steps Unsuspectedbenefitsfromhavingnightmares 150 94 is offered. Follow-up time is always recommended Session 2 151 95 to reassess the patient. Why nightmares might persist long after 152 96 Thefirst2sessionsencouragepatientstorecog- traumatic exposure 153 97 nize the effect of nightmares on their sleep by What happens to symptoms of low well- 154 98 showing them how nightmares promote learned being when nightmares are treated directly 155 99 insomnia.Theyareofferedtheviewthatnightmares Concept of symptom substitution 156 PROOF 100 themselves may develop as a learned behavior. proportion of nightmares caused by trauma 157 101 Thefinal 2 sessions engage the nightmare sufferer versus conditioning 158 102 to learn about the human imagery system, to Principles of general imagery and pleasant 159 103 monitor how this system operates, to appreciate imagery 160 104 the connections between daytime imagery and Overcoming difficulties in the use imagery 161 105 dreams, and to implement the specific steps of Session 3 162 106 IRT (ie, selecting a nightmare, changing the night- Broader discussion of imagery 163 107 mare into a new dream, and rehearsing the new Imagery as a vehicle for change 164 108 dream). Aspects of each of these 2 components Changing one’s nightmare identity 165 109 are included in all 4 sessions, but learned sleep Session 4 166 110 disorders predominates in the first 2 sessions and IRT for nightmares 167 111 imagery work predominates in the last 2 sessions. Selecting a nightmare 168 112 Anoverview of the main points covered in each of Changing the nightmare any way you wish 169 113 these sessions is presented in Box 1. Rehearsing the new dream 170 114 Throughout the sessions, we never discount or 171 115 ignore patients’ perspectives on triggering inci- 172 116 dents perceived as the cause of their nightmares. 173 117 Thispointisespeciallyrelevantfortraumasurvivors their nightmares with insomnia. Third, most 174 118 with nightmares and for the meanings they asso- patients resonate with the suffering caused by 175 119 ciate with their disturbing dreams. Nevertheless, poor sleep, which validates their negative sleep 176 120 patients are shown how nightmares can be effec- experiences and thus their reasons for seeking 177 121 tively treated without any discussion or emphasis treatment of these vexing sleep disturbances. 178 122 onprevioustraumaticeventsornon–sleep-related The current version of IRT focuses on the 179 123 PTSD symptoms. IRT is organized to minimize broader concept of poor sleep quality, including 180 124 exposuretherapyasaningredientofthetechnique. a discussion of insomnia. This also sets the stage 181 125 for future discussions about sleep-disordered 182 126 SESSION 1 breathing, which the authors have found in a high 183 127 Something to Sleep On rate of trauma survivors with nightmares and 184 21–25 128 UNCORRECTED 185 PTSD. The basic elements of the discussion 129 In our largest randomized controlled trial with revolve around the following points: (1) nightmares 186 130 PTSDpatients,20weintroducedIRTbydiscussing fragment sleep; (2) sleep fragmentation causes 187 131 hownightmarespromoteinsomnia.Thisapproach poor sleep quality; (3) poor sleep quality is 188 132 serves 3 purposes. First, it immediately shows the a psychological and physiologic process; (4) 189 133 patient that our interests are truly focused on efforts to improve sleep quality provide maximum 190 134 sleep-relatedproblemsandnotontrauma,current relief of sleep problems; and (5) treating night- 191 135 negative life events, or PTSD. Second, it creates mares is an important step and sometimes the 192 136 an insightful ‘‘mini-aha’’ experience because best first step in treating posttraumatic sleep 193 137 most trauma survivors do not generally associate disturbance. 194 CSLP262_proof 9 February 2010 7:50 pm ARTICLE IN PRESS ½Q1 Imagery Rehearsal Therapy: Principles and Practice 3 195 Nightmare Help and Harm dreamshavepersistedforsolong.Tosimplystate 252 196 Nightmares not only cause reexperiencing, but that nightmares are a learned behavior is an 253 197 they also initiate a cascading sequence of mental intriguing and provocative statement that may be 254 198 and physical hyperarousal symptoms, triggered met by a full range of emotions and responses. 255 199 bythethreats within the disturbing dreams. These This claim must be backed up with sufficient 256 200 arousal symptoms represent a second symptom examples to persuade the patient to stay in treat- 257 201 cluster in PTSD.26 Following arousal, patients ment. When queried beyond the explanations of 258 202 usually search for ways of preventing this cycle uncontrollability or unconscious processes, some 259 203 from recurring, and quite naturally they seek to patients suggest that nightmares persist because 260 204 avoid the trigger. In this specific sleep-related they are a long-term consequence of trauma (ie, 261 205 instance, trauma survivors report avoiding sleep the trauma is still causing nightmares). Others 262 206 onset at bedtime or re-onset in the middle of the believe that the persistence of nightmares is 263 207 night with the hope of preventing more bad caused by malfunctioning or altered neurotrans- 264 208 dreams. Although patients may not recognize mitters or a genetic predisposition. Occasionally, 265 209 sleep avoidance as a conscious process, most a patient initiating treatment will raise the possi- 266 210 nightmare sufferers resonate with the schema bility that nightmares are a habit or a learned 267 211 once they hear this sequence, which again coin- behavior (some even speak the phrase ‘‘broken 268 212 cides with a third symptom cluster of PTSD record’’). 269 213 However,mostpatientsarelockedintotheidea 270 214 (avoidance). PROOF 271 The discussion turns to the transition process that nightmares persist because trauma or other 215 through which nightmares move from an acute PTSDsymptomsstickintheirminds.Thisrelation- 272 216 phase to a chronic disorder. We use a paradigm, ship is therefore examined in a few ways in an 273 217 developed by Michael Hollifield, which helps attempt to produce cognitive restructuring. First, 274 218 patients recognize that soon after the trauma, we discuss how nightmares might ‘‘take on a life 275 219 they made a natural and smart choice to experi- of their own.’’ Most patients relate to this idea, 276 220 ence nightmares. That is, disturbing dreams, by becausetheyareunsurewhatprovokesadisturb- 277 221 many accounts from the empirical and theoretic ing dream on a specific night-to-night basis. We 278 222 literature, may serve a function of emotional ask whether it seems possible that some type of 279 223 adaptation to emotionally salient or traumatic psychotherapy could be directly targeted at the 280 224 events.27–30 Early after the trauma, nightmares nightmares. Could the disturbing dreams now be 281 225 might help to relive the experience and remember functioning in some distinct manner, separate 282 226 important details that might be meaningful to the from the PTSD process? 283 227 survivor; the dreams might provide useful infor- Wethenworkthroughaparadigmbasedonthe 284 228 mation for emotional processing, either spontane- question: ‘‘If you eliminated your disturbing 285 229 ously through dreaming, rapid eye movement dreams without influencing or treating any other 286 230 sleep, or in collaboration with a therapist; and aspect of your mental health, what would happen 287 231 the nightmares might serve a survival function to these 4 distress symptoms: anxiety, depres- 288 232 by motivating the individual to alter a behavior sion, somatization, and hostility?’’ Most patients 289 233 or some other aspect of their lifestyle to remain declare these symptoms should get worse, 290 234 out of harm’s way. This process leads to the because nightmares must have been serving 291 235 closing question, ‘‘Do these nightmares and dis- a purpose. The term ‘‘symptom substitution’’ is 292 236 turbing dreams still provide any benefits, once used regarding this potential downside of treating 293 237 they have lasted for so long?’’ We suggest that nightmares directly. 294 238 individuals reflect on this question for the next Weorganizethediscussion of this process with 295 239 week, but most people are quick to respond in the example of aggressive and violent nightmares 296 240 the negative. This hopefully provides them with andaskpatients to suggest the types of emotions 297 241 a hint at the possibility that nightmares can take experienced during such dreams. Most suggest 298 242 UNCORRECTED 299 on a life of their own, which is the major focus anger and rage, and a few mention fear, guilt, 243 of the next session. horror, or grief. We focus on anger and rage, and 300 244 then ask what would happen to these feelings if 301 245 a person were suddenly to stop having these 302 246 SESSION 2 nightmares. Again, patients usually state that 303 247 Persistence of Nightmares because the anger and rage have not been 304 248 released through the nightmare experience, these 305 249 Patients who have nightmares usually believe bad emotionsmustgosomewhereelse,whichleadsto 306 250 dreams are uncontrollable and from the uncon- further problems (eg, symptom substitution). 307 251 scious mind; yet, most want to know why the When they are again asked what would happen 308 CSLP262_proof 9 February 2010 7:50 pm ARTICLE IN PRESS 4 Krakow&Zadra 309 to symptomsofanxiety,depression,somatization, self-explanatory elements that are discussed 366 310 and hostility following direct treatment of disturb- include (1) imagery is a natural part of mental 367 311 ing dreams, most patients again report that these activity, which is easily described in behavioral 368 312 symptoms would either worsen or remain terms as 1 component of the mental system of 369 313 unchanged. thoughts,feelings,andimages;(2)imageryisoften 370 314 the last conscious activity just before sleep onset; 371 315 Learning to Have Nightmares (3) ergo, imageryduringthedaymaybeabridgeto 372 316 This phase marks a critical turning point, because imagery at night (dreams); (4) imagery is not medi- 373 317 we briefly but clearly describe the results from tation but simply a daydream with bit more inten- 374 318 nightmare treatment research in which anxiety tion or structure as needed or desired; (5) 375 319 and other distress symptoms usually decrease imagery skills can be tested in brief exercises of 376 320 after nightmares have been treated. Most patients a few minutes, and most trauma survivors have 377 321 sit back to regroup, because these results do not a reasonable ability to conduct such tests in 378 322 resonate with what they learned or believed about groups or individually; (6) some trauma survivors 379 323 nightmares.Althoughmanypatientswillnotfullyor are surprised at their healthy capacity to image 380 324 immediatelyprocesstheramificationsofthisinfor- things; and (7) most PTSD patients, except those 381 325 mation, most participants become curious and of extremeseverity, canpracticepleasantimagery 382 326 excited about this new perspective. exercises at home without much difficulty. 383 327 Special attention is needed during this part of 384 328 In the final phase of this discussion, the patient PROOF 385 is offered an opportunity to estimate the extent the session for the minority of patients with clear- 329 to which disturbing dreams can be attributed to cut imagery deficiencies. They may report either 386 330 trauma (0%–100%) or to habit (0%–100%) with outright difficulty as a black or blank screen, or 387 331 the sum of the 2 estimates equaling 100%. unpleasant images that force them to open their 388 332 Although this exercise can be performed earlier eyes and terminate the imagery session. All indi- 389 333 and later in the treatment, it is useful at this point viduals are provided with behavioral tips on how 390 334 because the patients have begun to experience to overcome unpleasant imagery (see list of 391 335 someflux in their perceptions about why they still common treatment obstacles in Box 2), but we 392 336 have nightmares. focus on acknowledging the unpleasant image 393 337 Many telltale indicators of treatment interest or and choosing to move on to a new, preferably 394 338 resistance arise from these estimates. Rarely, more pleasant or neutral image. This process is 395 339 a few individuals who believe strongly that the stated in the context of the thoughts, feelings, 396 340 nightmares are deeply entrenched in their trauma imagesparadigm,inwhichthepatientappreciates 397 341 process will deny any habit component. the natural flux in this system. That is, the mind- 398 342 Conversely, others who have completed success- body is continuously presented with new 399 343 ful psychotherapy for their traumatic exposure or thoughts, feelings and images, and when we 400 344 other mental health problems might declare their become aware of certain ones, we may choose 401 345 bad dreams must be 100% habit. The former to let go as we observe new ones emerging. 402 346 group tends to be reluctant to attempt IRT and All patients are directed to practice pleasant 403 347 should probably be discouraged from doing so imagery every day for a few minutes. The first 404 348 until some shift in their views occurs in the remain- step in this exercise is to encourage patients to 405 349 ing sessions. The latter group is not only ready to recognizethatimageryisafrequentlyexperienced 406 350 try IRT but these individuals may report decreases pathwaythatnormalsleepersoftenreportatsleep 407 351 onset.32,33 Conversely, nightmare sufferers may 408 352 in their nightmares following this session before want to improve their imagery skills but without 409 353 havinglearnedthefullIRTtechnique.Mostindivid- over stimulating themselves for fear of triggering 410 354 uals lie between these extremes (80–20, 50–50, or more disturbing images. Although few patients 411 355 20–80 splits are all common), but what is most report changes in their nightmares after using 412 interesting and informative is that nearly all of 356 UNCORRECTED 413 themreportsomeshiftintheir perceptions toward pleasant imagery during the ensuing week, their 357 habit recognition compared with what they would prospects remain high for future use of IRT 414 358 have estimated beforehand. because they experienced some perceived bene- 415 359 fits from simple imagery exercises. 416 360 Imagery Skills 417 361 Imagery Practice 418 362 The discussion now focuses on imagery, which is 419 363 a well-described behavioral therapy component To practice pleasant imagery, we use 3 possible 420 364 in the treatment of many other types of medical versions of standard instructions based on times 421 365 and psychological conditions.31 The relevant and of 1, 5, or 15 minutes and guided or unguided 422 CSLP262_proof 9 February 2010 7:50 pm
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.