290x Filetype PDF File size 0.66 MB Source: www.languageinindia.com
LANGUAGE IN INDIA
www.languageinindia.com
ISSN 1930-2940
A GRAMMAR
OF
MALAYALAM
Ravi Sankar S Nair, Ph.D.
ravisankarnair101@gmail.com
Language in India www.languageinindia.com
ISSN 1930-2940
12 : 11 November 2012
Ravi Sankar S Nair, Ph.D.
A GRAMMAR OF MALAYALAM 1
Preface
The grammatical tradition in Malayalam, compared to the three other major Dravidian
languages, is neither extensive nor ancient. Liilaatilakam, dated to the closing years of
th
14 century, is generally considered as the earliest treatise referring to grammatical
structures of Malayalam. This, however, is not a work of grammar as such, but deals
mainly with rhetoric as applied to Manipravaalam, the literary language that was an
admixture of Malayalam and Sanskrit.
Except some brief treatises in Portuguese, Latin and English authored by missionaries, up
th
to 19 century Malayalam did not have a proper grammar. Hermann Gundert’s Malayala
bhasaa vyaakaranam first published in 1851 and the revised and enlarged version coming
out in 1868 was the first proper grammatical treatise of Malayalam. Rev. George
Mathen’s Malayaalmayute vyaakaranam (1863), Pachu Mootthatu’s Keeralabhaasaa
vyaakaranam, A.R Rajaraaja Varma’s Keerala paaniniyam (originally published in 1896;
revised and enlarged edition in 1917) and M. Seshagiri Prabhu’s Vyaakaranamitram
(1904) followed.
Grammatical literature from this point of time was essentially focused on Keerala
paaniniiyam, which came to enjoy almost the status of an ‘authorised grammar’ of
Malayalam.
While Rajaraja Varma’s work stands out by its breadth of coverage and scholarship, it
cannot be denied that grammatical tradition in Malayalam has remained too long within
the ambit of a grammar written nearly a century back. A common grammatical tradition
drawing on various grammars failed to evolve and consequently the framework of
Keerala paaniniiyam continued as the sole grammatical model in Malayalam. The
grammars written in the post- Keerala paaniniiyam period are essentially explanatory
treatises on Keerala paaniniiyam.
While a few grammarians have suggested alternative analyses in some areas, the
grammars themselves faithfully follow the basic framework of Rajaraja Varma. For a
period of more than 80 years from Keerala paaniniiyam, no grammarian attempted either
to extend the Keerala paaniniyam model to produce a more comprehensive treatment of
Malayalam or to analyze the grammatical structure of Malayalam using alternative
models of grammatical description. Keerala paaniniyam and other traditional grammars
have extensively covered the morphology of the language. However, there is precious
little in them about syntax and semantics.
Having to deal with the structure of a modern language like Malayalam using a restricted
grammatical model has had serious repercussions in many fields. Researchers in the
fields of Computational Linguistics, speech pathology and language teaching very often
lament the absence of a more modern and comprehensive grammar of Malayalam,
especially one that adequately covers syntactic and semantic aspects.
Language in India www.languageinindia.com
ISSN 1930-2940
12 : 11 November 2012
Ravi Sankar S Nair, Ph.D.
A GRAMMAR OF MALAYALAM 2
From the 1960’s researchers in modern linguistics have published in many journals
pertinent analyses on various aspects of Malayalam grammar. A modern full-fledged
grammar of Malayalam was however, not attempted until 1997 when Asher and Kumari
published Malayalam under the Descriptive Grammars series edited by Bernard Comrie.
This work represents the most comprehensive and in-depth coverage of Malayalam
available. Syntax, morphology and phonology of Malayalam are extensively covered
drawing on the traditional views as well as modern linguistic analyses. The lacunae in the
traditional grammatical description has, however, not been entirely cleared up. Various
syntactic and semantic features associated with categories and structures of Malayalam
remained to be analyzed.
Vaakyadarśanam of Ravi Sankar S. Nair (2011) was an attempt in this direction. Basic
categories and structures of Malayalam are defined and described in this work, followed
by analyses of the syntactic and semantic features of each. The various sentence
structures and word formation mechanisms are also analyzed.
The present work draws on Vaakyadarśanam. The first three chapters on Noun, Verb
and Modifiers describe the semantic and syntactic features of each of these word classes.
The sub-categories are extensively classified. The last chapter provides a description of
the different sentence types in Malayalam.
Acknowledgements
The author is deeply indebted to the late Prof. Somasekharan Nair (formerly Professor,
Department of Linguistics, University of Kerala) for encouragement and advice during
the early stages of the preparation of Vaakyadarśanam, from which the present work is
drawn. Late Prof. A. P. Andrewskutty and Prof E. V. N Namboodiri (both from the
Department of Linguistics, University of Kerala) offered insightful comments on the
Malayalam version. I am grateful to Dr. Vijayendra Bhas and Dr. Kumari Nirmala, my
colleagues in the Hadramouth University of Science and Technology, for support and
constant encouragement.
Dedication
Dedicated to the young men and women of the Republic of Yemen, who lost their lives in
their struggle against an authoritarian regime in their country, during the early months of
2011 when the final version of this book was being written in the city of Seiyun in
Yemen where I was teaching.
Ravi Sankar S Nair
10 October 2012
Language in India www.languageinindia.com
ISSN 1930-2940
12 : 11 November 2012
Ravi Sankar S Nair, Ph.D.
A GRAMMAR OF MALAYALAM 3
CONTENTS
1. NOUN
1 .1 Case System
1 .1.1 Introduction
1 .1.2 Nominative
1 .1.3 Accusative
1 .1.4 Dative
1 .1.5 Sociative
1 .1.6 Instrumental
1 .1.7 Locative
1.3 Number and gender
1.4 Pronoun
1.4.1 Introduction
1.4.2 Personal pronouns
1.4.3 Reflexive pronouns
1.4.4 Interrogative pronouns
1.4.5 Possessive pronouns
1.4.6 Indefinite pronouns
2. VERB
2.0 Classification of verbs
2.1 Finite verbs
2.1.1 Stative verbs
2.1.1.1 Conjunctive verb aak
2.1.1.2 Meanings denoted by aak
2.1.1.3 aak as lexical verb
2.1.1.4 Cleft constructions
2.1.1.5 Aspectual form
2.1.1.6 Emphasizing different elements
2.1.1.2 Conjunctive verb untǔ
2.1.2.1 Meanings denoted by untǔ
2.1.2.2 Aspectual usage
2.1.2.3 Differences between aak and untǔ
2.1.1.3 Participial forms of conjunctive verbs
Language in India www.languageinindia.com
ISSN 1930-2940
12 : 11 November 2012
Ravi Sankar S Nair, Ph.D.
A GRAMMAR OF MALAYALAM 4
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.