170x Filetype PDF File size 0.41 MB Source: ijscl.net
ARTICLE HISTORY: Received June 2015 Received in revised form September 2015 Book Review Accepted September 2015 Available online September 2015 An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (7th ed.), Ronald Wardhaugh & Janet M. Fuller (2015), Wiley-Blackwell, ISBN 978-1-118-73229-8 1a 2a Zeinab Kafi , Khalil Motallebzadeh 1. Introduction what works in the classroom and what does not. This is in line with what Wardhaugh hose who have ever tried to read (2015) clearly believes in by highlighting that something of an academic character sociolinguistics is still clearly unified through about the role of culture and language, T its concern with how people use language to would hardly deny the deep rooted and create and express identities, relate to one profound nature of the language employed by another in groups, and seek to resist, protect, Wardhaugh (2006) to illustrate the effect of or increase various kinds of power. culture and its interaction with language as th well as the underlying themes and categories. In his latest edition (i.e., 7 ed.), An An Introduction to Sociolinguistics was co- Introduction to Sociolinguistics (2015), authored by Janet M. Fuller, right after Wardhaugh, along with Fuller, puts forward Wardhaugh’s fifth edition (2006). This the layout of the book as containing four textbook opens the door to new and numerous general topics/parts (Language and insights for language teachers to get to know Communities, Inherent Variety, Language and 1 PhD Candidate, Email: kafizb@gmail.com (Corresponding Author) Tel: +98- 915-525-3325 2 Associate Professor, Email: kmotallebz@gmail.com a Islamic Azad University, Torbat-Heidarieh Branch, Iran 136 Book Review: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics Interaction, and Sociolinguistics and Social societies and the different ideologies we have Justice) each embracing three up to four about languages surround this issue. They also chapters which all result in a rich 447 page softly pick up the idea of ‘Linguistic textbook. On a wider scope, the themes will Landscape’ and define it as “the display of recur across the discussions of dialects, languages in public spaces, including signs, multilingualism, discourse, and social justice. billboards, advertisements, and graffiti” (p. The book largely begins with a short 86). They strongly put this belief forward that introduction provided by the authors mainly how languages appear in public space provides focusing on the key concepts in the study of evidence about underlying ideologies sociolinguistics as well as the general layout of concerning particular codes and their speakers. the book. They portray this through a short Moreover, one pattern of language use they explanation of notions such as competence and explore is diglossia, in which the two performance, variation, language and culture, languages differ in terms of their status in the Whorfian hypothesis, and finally the society; one is considered more prestigious methodological concerns in this area. and is used in more formal contexts, the other is reserved for more casual events and 2. Chapter 2: Language, Dialects, and interactions. Finally, what is discussed as the Varieties end point of this chapter, are the three approaches to the study of multilingual In the second chapter, ‘Languages, Dialects discourse which include Communication and Varieties’, the central issues move around Accommodation theory, the Markedness the notion of standard language which depicts Model, and the study of language choice as the difference between a language and a part of the social construction of identity. dialect by talking about style, register, and 5. Chapter 5: Contact Languages: genre and brings the idea to an end by Structural Consequences of Social highlighting the fact that “particular ways of Factors speaking are considered distinct languages or subordinated dialects because of sociopolitical Contact languages and the underlying issues ideologies and identities, not because of are discussed in chapter 5. The authors firstly linguistic differences between varieties” (p. talk about the ever well-known issue of Lingua 54). And also stress the fact that each language Francas, as “a language which is used has got its own regional, and social dialects as habitually by people whose mother tongues are well as style, register, and genre. different in order to facilitate communication 3. Chapter 3: Defining Groups between them” (p. 115). What surfaces in the chapter is a reference given to pidgin and ‘Defining Groups’ is the bulk of attention in creole. They claim that, most of the linguists chapter 3. Speech communities, language in this area often use the terms superstrate and boundaries, and shared norms constitute part substrate to refer to the different roles of the discussions in this chapter. The authors languages play in the development of a contact also try to well define the term ‘Social language. Right after this, the formation of Identities’ by stressing the fact that identity is pidgins and creoles is discussed as well as not what you have, it is absolutely what you their geographical distribution, and finally, do! It is something that finds its basis in their linguistic characteristics such as interaction. They further and finally discuss phonology, morphosyntax, and vocabulary are what some beliefs about language and social explained in detail. All in all the focus of the chapter is on how languages change. groups are, and how a person’s identity can be linked to social group membership. 6. Chapter 6: Language Variation 4. Chapter 4: Languages in Contact: An old saying from William Cowper gives a Multilingual Societies and Multilingual nice taste to the beginning of part two of this Discourse book (chapter 6). He pictures language Chapter 4 attempts to explain that, variation by uttering that, “Variety is the spice multilingualism is an upcoming issue in many of life. Constance alone is strange” (p. 139). Z. Kafi & K. Motallebzadeh/ International Journal of Society, Culture & Language, 4(2), 2016 ISSN 2329-2210 137 Through talking about regional variation, he claiming that changes toward more vernacular mentions mapping dialects and attempts to forms tend to be led by men, while changes refer to dialect mixture and free variation in toward the standard forms tend to be led by this way: dialect mixture “is the existence in women. They also make use of the term one locality of two or more dialects which Linguistic Marketplace to state the fact that, allow a speaker or speakers to draw now on there are some forces at work including what one dialect and then on the other” (p. 147). An individuals want and what they will accept or alternative explanation is free variation, that is, reject linguistically to satisfy these wants? variation of no social significance. The authors Having discussed the changes in progress, the further define a linguistic item having authors point out two main kinds of changes: identifiable variants, which are the different change from above (change brought about forms used in an environment as Linguistic consciously, containing issues of prestige) and Variable (For example, words like singing and below (change from below conscious fishing are sometimes pronounced as singin’ awareness, which is systematic). Finally, the and fishin’). What comes highlighted in the relation between lifestyle and language change analysis of variants is the principle of is explained through what Eckert calls ‘jocks’ accountability. and ‘burnouts’ (“Jocks tend to be college- 7. Chapter 7: Three Waves of Variation bound and white-collaroriented; burnouts will leave school for the blue-collar workplace” (p. Studies 217)). Continuing the ideas presented in chapter 6, 9. Chapter 9: Ethnographic Approaches different waves of variation are put for a in Sociolinguistics debate in chapter 7. The first wave includes gender variation, and the fourth floor. The crucial importance of language for Wardhaugh and his co-author, refer to interaction in chapter 9, is revealed through a hypercorrection as an event which “occurs very touching sentence by Robert Southey: when individuals consciously try to speak like “My never-failing friends are they, with whom people they regard as socially superior but I converse day by day”. This chapter largely actually go too far and overdo the particular focuses on ethnography approaches from a linguistic behavior they are attempting to sociolinguistic perspective. This kind of match” (p. 147).The second wave includes research is mostly carried out through social networks in Belfast (Northern Ireland), participant observation. The ethnography of and gender variation. Finally, in the third communication is firstly discussed through the wave, they discuss issues such as stance. notion of communicative competence (the 8. Chapter 8: Language Variation and knowledge of how to use language in culturally appropriate ways). There exists a Change very nice and tangible explanation of the issue The central idea in chapter 8 is to discuss how at hand, to which a paragraph is dedicated and variation can lead to language change. To do it is worth mentioning here: so, firstly the traditional view of change is In learning to speak we are also learning explained (changes that result in structural to communicate in ways appropriate to consequences) as well as externally motivated the group in which we are doing that changes (changes brought about through learning; this is sometimes called language contact). Further on, the chapter language socialization. These ways differ depicts and explains some of the changes in from group to group; consequently, as progress such as vowel shift. Change over time we move from one group to another or or age-grading (i.e., using speech appropriate from one language to another, we must to your age group, features which you may no learn the new ways if we are to it into longer use when you are older) is the next that new group or to use that new issue being illustrated in the chapter. The language properly. Communicative relation between gender and language change competence is therefore a key is then explained with the help of a reference component of social competence. (p. given to a generalization that has been made, 231) 138 Book Review: An Introduction to Sociolinguistics They later bring up the topic of sometimes said that, conversations are locally ethnomethodology to stress that, “they are managed; that is, “they proceed without any interested in the processes and techniques that conscious plan and the participants simply rely people use to interpret the world around them on using the principles that are available to and to interact with that world” (p. 235). them to achieve any wider objectives they Finally, Linguistic ethnography, as a relatively have” (p. 282) Later on in the chapter, they new issue in sociolinguistics, is another area of maintain that, one particularly important interest to the authors in this chapter. They principle used in CA is the adjacency pair i.e., refer to it as “attempts to combine close detail utterance types of certain kinds are found to of local action and interaction as embedded in co-occur. Finally, they shed light on a wider social world” (p. 241). interactional sociolinguistics, which is defined 10. Chapter 10: Pragmatics as “the search for replicable methods of qualitative analysis that account for our ability Pragmatics goes as the main category of to interpret what participants intend to convey discussion in chapter 10. To smoothly open the in everyday communicative practice” (p. 291). discussion in this chapter, speech acts and its This is considered as one strand of linguistic sub categories (propositions, and phatic ethnography according to Rampton (2007). utterances) are put forward. Performative The chapter is closed by critical discourse utterances are also described as the case in analysis as a method designed to show how which “a person is not just saying something social inequality is reproduced through but is actually doing something if certain real- language use. world conditions are met” (p. 249). 12. Chapter 12: Language, Gender, and Locutions (the utterances we use are Sexuality locutions.), illocutionary acts (the intent of a "It is hard for a woman to define her feelings locution is called an illocutionary act.), and in language which is chiefly made by men to perlocutions (the effect on the listeners to do express theirs” (p. 309), is the initiation of the things). Later on, four conversation maxims by th Grice are put forward (quality, quantity, 12 chapter: "language, gender and sexuality". relation, and manner) and the concept of To depict the relation between language and politeness (positive and negative politeness, gender, the authors firstly maintain that, indirectness, and social distance) is explained gender is a culturally constructed phenomenon in depth. Power and solidarity is the final and further refers to the terms Transgendor feature of this chapter in which topics such as (people who have transitioned from one sex pronouns and positioning, naming and titles, category to another) and cisgendor (people and fluidity and change in address terms are whose sex category matches their gender). The discussed. In fact, the authors turn to pronouns major discussion here centers around the fact and other terms of address to explore how that sexist language was mainly used to refer these aspects of language are used to position to the words that differentiated men from the speaker and addressee in the interaction. women, but later on more gender neutral words were used to lessen the discrimination 11. Chapter 11: Discourse Analysis and to shift the difference from a more masculine taste to a more neutral one. Chapter 11, discourse analysis (DA), largely meanwhile, he puts forward the idea of gender tries to depict that we rarely use language preferential language mainly to say that, one monologically and such uses are clearly way of speaking/language may be preferred by marked. The unmarked use is dialogical, and one gender but not by the other. Deficit conversation analysis (CA) is another sub language is used to depict the way women use category, trying to point out that the language and tend to act in serious social conversational analysts, working within the gatherings, due to the fact that, they feel less ethnomethodological tradition, point out that, confident in some circumstances and they tend regardless of how many speakers are involved to show this in their utterances by using forms in a conversation, speakers take turns of such as tag questions. What gives rise to their various lengths with very little overlap. They discussion throughout this chapter, is keep stressing the fact that, it is also dominance, i.e., power relations give the
no reviews yet
Please Login to review.